2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
2000 HSS/PSA Program 1 - History of Science Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>HSS</strong> Abstracts<br />
Enlightenment by their activities. And in the nineteenth, the origins <strong>of</strong> social<br />
science occurred during debates over the significance <strong>of</strong> piracy for the very<br />
definition <strong>of</strong> society. Today, the new world <strong>of</strong> the life sciences is facing its own<br />
brand <strong>of</strong> “biopiracy” —one that is calling fundamental principles <strong>of</strong> creativity<br />
and intellectual property into question all over again. My presentation will thus<br />
seek to put our present concerns into deep historical context. I hope thereby to<br />
suggest how a historical understanding <strong>of</strong> piracy can help us make sense <strong>of</strong><br />
some urgent questions facing today’s scientific world.<br />
Matthew␣ L. Jones Columbia University<br />
Calculating Machinery:<br />
Pascal and Leibniz on Knowledge and Spectacle in the Early Modern State<br />
Blaise Pascal and Gottfried Leibniz <strong>of</strong>fered their calculating machines and<br />
techniques as means for augmenting and supplementing current techniques <strong>of</strong><br />
governing in the early modern state. Both introduced their machines and<br />
calculational techniques within a detailed account <strong>of</strong> the roles <strong>of</strong> governmental<br />
knowledge and spectacle for the smooth running <strong>of</strong> the state. Both provided<br />
their techniques as means to perfect the monarch’s knowledge and to justify<br />
and to help produce the faith the people ought to place in their ruler. Despite<br />
the gap separating Pascal’s infamous pessimism and Leibniz’s even more<br />
infamous optimism, their machines and techniques helped them to articulate<br />
their accounts <strong>of</strong> the deliberate, artificial production <strong>of</strong> the tangible and<br />
intangible elements necessary for producing and maintaining peaceful societies.<br />
106<br />
Susan␣ D. Jones University <strong>of</strong> Colorado<br />
Creating a Scientific Context for Contingent Knowledge in Veterinary<br />
Medicine<br />
In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, North American veterinary<br />
scientists became heavily involved in government-sponsored research on pressing<br />
livestock disease problems. Using the cases <strong>of</strong> Pictou Cattle Disease and Texas<br />
Cattle Fever, this paper illustrates the methodologies that veterinary scientists<br />
agreed upon as legitimate for identifying the etiologies <strong>of</strong> animal diseases.<br />
Stockmen had long suspected that Pictou Cattle Disease was caused by ingestion<br />
<strong>of</strong> a poisonous plant, and Texas Cattle Fever by an infestation <strong>of</strong> ticks. As<br />
veterinary scientists went about studying these diseases, however, their<br />
epistemological loyalty to the tenets <strong>of</strong> bacteriology guided their investigations.<br />
They also continued to rely upon fieldwork, and it served as the conduit through<br />
which contingent knowledge and local context entered the realm <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />
explanation. Especially in the case <strong>of</strong> Texas Cattle Fever, this methodology