Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
intelligence? Why do people believe that automata can think? What do rocket-powered Frisbees have<br />
to do with AI? Most important, what do historians <strong>of</strong> science <strong>and</strong> technology studying modernity gain<br />
by examining popular culture?<br />
Wolfe, Audra<br />
E-mail Address: awolfe@sas.upenn.edu<br />
<strong>Science</strong> <strong>and</strong> Liberty for All: The Biological <strong>Science</strong>s Curriculum Study<br />
The 1957 launch <strong>of</strong> Sputnik catalyzed nascent efforts to upgrade American schools. Many blamed<br />
the United States' perceived shortcomings on an educational system that valued social skills over scientific<br />
<strong>and</strong> technical knowledge. University scientists spearheaded a number <strong>of</strong> experimental educational<br />
programs designed to close the "gap" between cutting-edge research <strong>and</strong> secondary education. Unlike<br />
the Physical <strong>Science</strong>s Curriculum Study or the Illinois Mathematics Study Group, the Biological <strong>Science</strong>s<br />
Curriculum Study (BSCS) imagined itself as an organization that worked closely with educational<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>and</strong> attempted to reach all high school students. Early archival documents from the BSCS<br />
show that its leaders hoped that teaching students about evolution would prepare them for citizenship in<br />
the nuclear <strong>and</strong> space age. Since biology was the only science course taken by eight <strong>of</strong> ten high school<br />
students, the BSCS saw a "tremendous opportunity <strong>and</strong> grave responsibility" to inculcate a scientific<br />
worldview in students, regardless <strong>of</strong> ability or vocational preferences. The idea that familiarity with<br />
science would improve democracy was not new-but whereas public underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> science programs<br />
separated science from its public, the BSCS advanced an inclusive philosophy that encouraged students<br />
to participate in the scientific enterprise through laboratory experiments <strong>and</strong> research. BSCS leadership<br />
saw themselves as stewards <strong>of</strong> American democracy, ensuring a better future by exposing schoolchildren<br />
to the latest discoveries <strong>of</strong> the biological sciences. This paper examines the urges behind <strong>and</strong> the ironies<br />
inherent in an inclusive scientific program that brought elite university scientists directly in contact with<br />
American students, parents, <strong>and</strong> teachers.