14.01.2014 Views

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, for those scientists who indeed had to ab<strong>and</strong>on their laboratories, this sometimes only<br />

forced them to discontinue research programs that had long lost their fruitfulness <strong>and</strong> to redirect their<br />

research in ways that paid <strong>of</strong>f surprisingly well after the war. Here the development <strong>of</strong> Dutch astronomy<br />

during <strong>and</strong> after the war is a good example. Of course, the war should not be regarded as a blessing in<br />

disguise, but it certainly wasn't the total disaster conventional wisdom has made us believe it was.<br />

V<strong>and</strong>en Broecke, Steven<br />

E-mail Address: steven.v<strong>and</strong>enbroecke@arts.kuleuven.ac.be<br />

On the Natural-Philosophical <strong>and</strong> Textual Problems <strong>of</strong> Late Renaissance Astrology<br />

This paper discusses the various strategies by which high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile astrologers <strong>of</strong> the 16th-century<br />

aimed at countering the enormous natural-philosophical <strong>and</strong> textual problems which Giovanni Pico's<br />

Disputations had thrown up in 1495. While Pico had suggested that each planet imparted identical<br />

effects to the sublunar realm, most astrologers clinged to the Ptolemaic idea that these effects were<br />

different for each celestial body. In order to establish the specific nature <strong>of</strong> each planet’s influence, many<br />

took up a gr<strong>and</strong> project <strong>of</strong> weather-observation in order to reconstruct astrological physics. Medical<br />

astrology, which advocated a moderate use <strong>of</strong> astro-meteorology for diagnosis, prognosis as well as<br />

therapy, stimulated this approach. Another model was found in the ancient parapegmata ascribed to<br />

farmers, pilots <strong>and</strong> physicians. These traditional models severely restricted both the traditional textual<br />

canon <strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> astrological parameters. Although some parts <strong>of</strong> astrological practice were<br />

supposedly open to contemporary verification <strong>and</strong>/or reconstruction, many others were not. One <strong>of</strong> the<br />

foremost examples <strong>of</strong> the latter category are the astrological houses. Renaissance astrological theorists<br />

generally took the existence <strong>of</strong> astrological houses, which seemed to be warranted by ancient experience,<br />

for granted. But this did not address another problem: how to dissolve the conflicting statements <strong>of</strong><br />

various authoritative texts (e.g. Ptolemy vs. Firmicus Maternus) concerning the true method <strong>of</strong> housedivision.<br />

This problem is discussed as an example <strong>of</strong> the responses to Pico's exposure <strong>of</strong> the internal<br />

contradictions <strong>of</strong> the astrological textual canon.<br />

Vetter, Jeremy<br />

E-mail Address: jvetter@sas.upenn.edu<br />

Getting Into the Field: Transportation Networks, Colonial Infrastructure, <strong>and</strong> the Making <strong>of</strong><br />

Anthropological Knowledge in the Nineteenth Century<br />

In order to do scientific research in the field, the scientist must be able to get to the field site, be<br />

sustained while residing there, <strong>and</strong> return home safely--this seems obvious, almost trivial. Yet these<br />

practical aspects <strong>of</strong> doing field work are not incidental preconditions to the conduct <strong>of</strong> scientific research<br />

on the contrary, they are <strong>of</strong>ten crucial in shaping research directions, perceptions, <strong>and</strong> interpretations.<br />

This paper follows scientists into the field, by l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> sea, to see how they took advantage <strong>of</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

transportation networks <strong>and</strong> colonial infrastructure in the nineteenth century to make their work<br />

possible. In particular, it examines how these practical issues <strong>of</strong> doing science in the field influenced the<br />

making <strong>of</strong> knowledge about human beings <strong>and</strong> their societies, which was integral to the emerging<br />

discipline <strong>of</strong> anthropology. It approaches this question through two contrasting examples: the anthropological<br />

work <strong>of</strong> Alfred Russel Wallace during his voyage by sea among the isl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> peninsulas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

East Indies from 1848 to 1862, <strong>and</strong> the studies <strong>of</strong> American Indians through overl<strong>and</strong> expeditions in the<br />

western United States by John Wesley Powell <strong>and</strong> others associated with the Bureau <strong>of</strong> American Ethnology<br />

a few decades later. By uncovering the role that getting into the field played in the making <strong>of</strong><br />

knowledge there, this paper explores both the special characteristics <strong>of</strong> anthropology as a discipline with<br />

human subjects, <strong>and</strong> the more general features <strong>of</strong> scientific field practice in places with rapidly exp<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

transportation networks <strong>and</strong> colonial infrastructure for managing cross-cultural interactions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!