14.01.2014 Views

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Shavit,Ayelet<br />

E-mail Address: ashavit@kfar-giladi.org.il<br />

Evolutionary models resonate with social shifts<br />

Evolutionary models <strong>and</strong> evolutionary terms - such as 'group' or 'individual' - <strong>of</strong>ten associate with<br />

social values. Over 70 years, the evolution <strong>of</strong> altruism by group selection remains unresolved yet thriving.<br />

I will suggest, that the resonance between empirical models <strong>and</strong> social values can explain to a<br />

certain extent the open-ended practice <strong>of</strong> the group selection debate. The scope <strong>of</strong> this paper does not<br />

enable a full historical argument but only points at some dominant shifts concerning group selection. In<br />

the first half <strong>of</strong> the last century, group selection was directly used to support conflicting - pacifist or<br />

nationalistic - social values. In the last three decades, different selection models presuppose relatively<br />

similar worldviews though avoiding direct social implications. If the history <strong>of</strong> group selection still reechoes<br />

with conflicting values, <strong>and</strong> if 'individual selection' associates exclusively with democracy, a<br />

researcher may feel obliged to state his or her opinion on group selection. However, since the present<br />

substructure <strong>of</strong> group selection resembles that <strong>of</strong> individual selection, then empirically distinguishing<br />

groups from individuals can lose much <strong>of</strong> its appeal. The social resonance <strong>of</strong> evolutionary theory may<br />

partly explain a converse situation: where many researchers participate in an empirical debate over<br />

altruism by group selection, but only few experiments are found, <strong>and</strong> even the strongest experimental<br />

attempts do not clearly differentiate groups from individuals.<br />

Shen, Grace<br />

E-mail Address: gyshen@fas.harvard.edu<br />

Making <strong>History</strong> Natural: Writing 20th century vernacular into 17th century travels<br />

After the fall <strong>of</strong> the Ming Dynasty to Qing rulership (in 1644), Chinese scholars, such as Gu Yanwu,<br />

championed a new form <strong>of</strong> Classical study which employed critical philological methods to re-evaluate<br />

the textual canon <strong>and</strong> to search for both the roots <strong>of</strong> defeat <strong>and</strong> the seeds <strong>of</strong> renewal. Many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

founders <strong>of</strong> this school <strong>of</strong> textual criticism refused to serve the new Qing dynasty <strong>and</strong> concentrated on<br />

philological scholarship. They also engaged in "practical studies" including natural historical <strong>and</strong> military-strategic<br />

surveys. Interestingly, just as Ming loyalists revised their approach to linguistic studies <strong>and</strong><br />

explored their natural world as a means <strong>of</strong> cultural renewal, 20th century Chinese reformers called for<br />

the replacement <strong>of</strong> Classical Chinese by the vernacular <strong>and</strong> advocated scientific research in order to<br />

make China more "fit." Not surprisingly, then, stories <strong>of</strong> Ming loyalist resistance to 17th century<br />

Manchu conquest played an important role in the patriotic imagination <strong>of</strong> 20th century Chinese intellectuals.<br />

This paper engages modern Chinese ideas about the relationship between language <strong>and</strong> science by<br />

analyzing how Ting Wen-chiang, the famous 20th century Chinese geologist, re-imagined the philological<br />

<strong>and</strong> natural historical work <strong>of</strong> the 17th century scholars , Xu Xiake <strong>and</strong> Song Yingxiang in light <strong>of</strong><br />

perceived analogies between his own time period <strong>and</strong> theirs. In particular, I consider the ways in which<br />

Ting's use <strong>of</strong> the modern Chinese vernacular subtlely changes the qualities <strong>of</strong> Xu <strong>and</strong> Song's writings.<br />

Shermer, Michael<br />

E-mail Address: skepticmag@aol.com<br />

Stephen Jay Gould as Historian <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>: A Quantitative Content Analysis <strong>of</strong> His Works<br />

<strong>Science</strong> historian Ronald Numbers once remarked that the two most influential historians <strong>of</strong> science<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 20th century were Thomas Kuhn <strong>and</strong> Stephen Jay Gould. All science historians are deeply familiar<br />

with Kuhn's work <strong>and</strong> influence, <strong>and</strong> all know <strong>of</strong> the remarkable impact Gould has had on evolutionary<br />

theory. But little attention has been paid to the depth, scope, <strong>and</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> Gould's role as<br />

historian <strong>of</strong> science. Shermer will present the results <strong>of</strong> an extensive quantitative content analysis <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!