14.01.2014 Views

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the 1830s <strong>and</strong> 1840s, the concept <strong>of</strong> microscopical error was completely transformed. In the preceding<br />

decades, the source <strong>of</strong> error was located in the observer's mind <strong>and</strong> tied to the notion <strong>of</strong> spontaneity<br />

<strong>of</strong> reasoning. After about 1830, the troublesome properties <strong>of</strong> physical objects <strong>and</strong> organs also came to<br />

be regarded as sources <strong>of</strong> error. The case illustrates the extent to which the mechanisms for disciplining<br />

the investigator <strong>and</strong> regulating the management <strong>of</strong> instruments <strong>and</strong> objects were shaped by prevailing<br />

notions <strong>of</strong> error. The study can thus serve as a corrective for our present, very general accounts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

role <strong>of</strong> discipline in knowledge production. With respect to this case, I argue that gauging past epistemological<br />

concepts against present ones can help uncover the assumptions <strong>and</strong> presuppositions implicit in<br />

current epistemological notions <strong>and</strong> clarify our normative intuitions about science, experience, <strong>and</strong><br />

knowledge.<br />

Schiefsky, Mark<br />

E-mail Address: mjschief@fas.harvard.edu<br />

Technê <strong>and</strong> Method in Ancient Medicine <strong>and</strong> Mechanics Medicine <strong>and</strong> Mechanics<br />

In ancient Greece from at least the fifth century BCE, the concept <strong>of</strong> technê or expert knowledge was<br />

closely associated with the idea <strong>of</strong> method. My goal in this paper is to discuss three aspects <strong>of</strong> this<br />

association in two traditions <strong>of</strong> Greek scientific <strong>and</strong> practical activity, each <strong>of</strong> which was considered to<br />

be a technê: Hippocratic medicine <strong>and</strong> Alex<strong>and</strong>rian mechanics. First, authors in both traditions stress<br />

that practitioners have a systematic method for attaining the results at which they aim, <strong>and</strong> do not proceed<br />

in a chance or arbitrary fashion. Secondly, in both traditions this systematic method is supposed to<br />

be grounded in a body <strong>of</strong> theoretical knowledge. This knowledge enables a doctor to explain the effectiveness<br />

<strong>of</strong> a cure by appealing to the behavior <strong>of</strong> humors in the body, <strong>and</strong> a mechanical practitioner to<br />

explain the operation <strong>of</strong> a complex machine in terms <strong>of</strong> simpler ones, such as the balance or lever.<br />

Thirdly, this theoretical knowledge is reached by a process <strong>of</strong> discovery that involves appeal to analogies<br />

with familiar objects to gain knowledge <strong>of</strong> the invisible or unknown thus medical authors draw analogies<br />

with cooking to explain the behavior <strong>of</strong> substances in the body, <strong>and</strong> mechanical writers draw analogies<br />

between complex machines <strong>and</strong> simple ones to explain the former in terms <strong>of</strong> the latter. These<br />

parallels testify to a striking continuity in Greek conceptions <strong>of</strong> technê across different disciplines <strong>and</strong> to<br />

the richness <strong>of</strong> these ancient discussions for the study <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> scientific method.<br />

Schmidgen, Henning<br />

E-mail Address: schmidg@mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de<br />

Time, Psychology, <strong>and</strong> Telegraphy: The Technological Context <strong>of</strong> the Reaction Time Experiment,<br />

1860-1880<br />

The "reaction experiment with the Hipp chronoscope" is one <strong>of</strong> the classical experiments <strong>of</strong> modern<br />

psychology. In Wilhelm Wundt's (1832-1920) laboratory as well as in many other psychological laboratories<br />

modelled after the Leipzig lab, experimental research on reaction time was (<strong>and</strong> sometimes still is)<br />

a key issue. This paper investigates the technological <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts <strong>of</strong> the reaction time experiment<br />

<strong>and</strong> argues that development in time measurement <strong>and</strong> communication in other areas <strong>of</strong> science<br />

<strong>and</strong> technology (astronomy, clock industry) were decisive for shaping laboratory techniques <strong>and</strong> concepts<br />

in psychology. The chronoscope was constructed by Matthias Hipp (1813-1893) in the late 1840s.<br />

In 1861 the astronomer Adolphe Hirsch (1830-1901) used the chronsocope to measure observational<br />

errors ("personal equation"). Hirsch's observatory at Neuchâtel (Switzerl<strong>and</strong>) served to control the<br />

quality <strong>of</strong> clocks produced in the nearby Jura mountains. Hipp provided the observatory with a telegraphic<br />

system that sent time signals to the centers <strong>of</strong> clock production. Hipp also lent Hirsch the<br />

chronoscope he used in his experiments. I argue that telegraphic time technology was decisive for the<br />

theories <strong>and</strong> practices <strong>of</strong> Wundt's physiological psychology. Wundt dealt with psychological processes in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!