14.01.2014 Views

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

edge to the creation <strong>of</strong> international scientific statements on race <strong>and</strong> the universal rights <strong>of</strong> man. Yet<br />

postwar anthropology was itself rife with internal conflict for much <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, physical<br />

<strong>and</strong> cultural anthropologists remained divided over the relationship between culture <strong>and</strong> biology, diffusion<br />

<strong>and</strong> evolution, dynamic societies <strong>and</strong> static races. Informed by the 42 <strong>and</strong> gripped by the postwar<br />

drive for tolerance <strong>and</strong> equality, these two antagonistic camps sought to reintegrate their disciplines in<br />

the name <strong>of</strong> global human welfare. Physical <strong>and</strong> cultural anthropologists proposed definitions <strong>of</strong> culture<br />

that would remove the boundary separating the fields <strong>and</strong> concurrently shape the future <strong>of</strong> the discipline<br />

to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> a postwar world. This paper will examine the ways in which physical <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

anthropologists reformulated the notion <strong>of</strong> culture <strong>and</strong> negotiated its complicated relationships with<br />

biology <strong>and</strong> evolution in an unsuccessful attempt to forge consensus within <strong>and</strong> beyond the discipline.<br />

Rothenberg,Marc<br />

E-mail Address:<br />

Rozwadowski, Helen<br />

E-mail Address: helenroz@mac.com<br />

"We must not forget the women": Involvement <strong>of</strong> women in Victorian marine science<br />

The entry <strong>of</strong> women into the ocean sciences has been recent <strong>and</strong> hard-won. Oceanographers, <strong>and</strong><br />

most historians until recently, have believed that this very male-dominated field had been so since its<br />

inception, usually taken to be the famous four-year circumnavigation <strong>of</strong> HMS Challenger in the 1870s.<br />

Investigation <strong>of</strong> marine fauna during the Victorian era, however, was hardly limited to the naval <strong>and</strong><br />

exploratory expeditions which circled the globe demonstrating imperial might. While such cruises<br />

represented one progenitor <strong>of</strong> oceanography, others provided much wider social access to the sea. As<br />

the vogue <strong>of</strong> sea bathing for health reasons broadened into the seaside holiday, marine natural history<br />

<strong>of</strong>fered an uplifting excuse for men, women, <strong>and</strong> children alike to indulge in the pleasures <strong>of</strong> beach<br />

combing. Marine zoology proved popular to women, as did certain other fields such as botany <strong>and</strong><br />

entomology, because collecting provided healthy outdoor activity yet did not necessitate shooting or<br />

skinning animals. The youthful sport <strong>of</strong> yachting provided them access to a genteel version <strong>of</strong> the<br />

maritime world through which they could collect <strong>and</strong> study marine fauna <strong>and</strong> flora. The exit <strong>of</strong> women<br />

from ocean science was, as in other fields, in part forced by pr<strong>of</strong>essional marine scientists, especially as<br />

governments began to hire biologists to study declines in commercial fisheries. This trend coincided<br />

with the decreasing use yachts <strong>and</strong> private patrons for ocean science, leaving women str<strong>and</strong>ed on shore.<br />

Ruehl, Martin<br />

E-mail Address: mar23@cam.ac.uk<br />

The Use <strong>and</strong> Disadvantage <strong>of</strong> Theory: Dilthey, Rickert <strong>and</strong> the Crisis <strong>of</strong> Historicism in Fin-de-<br />

Siècle Germany<br />

This paper examines a 'theory construction' in Imperial Germany that has been largely neglected so<br />

far by historians <strong>of</strong> science: the attempt <strong>of</strong> hermeneutic <strong>and</strong> neo-Kantian philosophers, at the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nineteenth century, to provide historicism (Historismus) with a new theoretical foundation. By the<br />

1880s, the idealistic bases <strong>of</strong> historicism had all but crumbled under the onslaught <strong>of</strong> positivism. According<br />

to most recent scholars in the field <strong>of</strong> German Geschichtswissenschaft, the theoretical writings<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wilhelm Dilthey <strong>and</strong> Heinrich Rickert in the 1890s effectively helped historicism to overcome its finde-siècle<br />

crisis <strong>and</strong> gave it a new lease on life which only ran out in the 1960s. This paper, by contrast,<br />

argues that the historiographical theories developed by Dilthey <strong>and</strong> Rickert transformed the very essence

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!