14.01.2014 Views

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

keep Nordics <strong>and</strong> Anglo-Saxons safe from the contamination <strong>of</strong> other <strong>and</strong> ‘lesser’ orders. He spent most<br />

<strong>of</strong> his career attempting to prove his assertions through the collection <strong>of</strong> fossil evidence, <strong>and</strong> promoting<br />

his ideas to the wider world. His efforts included becoming active in the eugenics <strong>and</strong> immigration<br />

restriction movements as well as sponsoring the famous Central Asiatic Expeditions to ‘Outer Mongolia’<br />

led by Roy Chapman Andrews. This paper will examine the racial thinking in Osborn’s work <strong>and</strong> how it<br />

evolved over time.<br />

Reidy, Michael<br />

E-mail Address: mreidy@montana.edu<br />

'Scientists' <strong>and</strong> 'Subordinate Labourers': Class <strong>and</strong> the Creation <strong>of</strong> Victorian <strong>Science</strong><br />

William Whewell coined the term "scientist" in 1833 owing to the dramatic changes that occurred in<br />

science in the early Victorian era. Natural philosophers transformed our underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> light, heat,<br />

electricity <strong>and</strong> magnetism, <strong>and</strong> consolidated the fields <strong>of</strong> chemistry, physics, <strong>and</strong> geology. Furthermore,<br />

Susan Faye Cannon noted in this same period a change in focus to global, geophysical research in<br />

Britain. This changed natural philosophy in Britain from a limited <strong>and</strong> domestic undertaking, receiving<br />

parsimonious state support <strong>and</strong> embracing little communication among scientists <strong>of</strong> different nations, to<br />

a worldwide <strong>and</strong> relatively well-financed scientific practice that extended far beyond the confines <strong>of</strong><br />

Britain. Historians have since taken up Cannon’s initial analysis with enthusiasm, but they have failed<br />

to link this prevalent type <strong>of</strong> research to the broader trend <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalization <strong>of</strong> the discipline. In this<br />

paper, I will demonstrate that Humboldtian initiatives relied on a broad base <strong>of</strong> support <strong>and</strong> a far-reaching<br />

network <strong>of</strong> observers that included large segments <strong>of</strong> the working classes. These "subordinate<br />

laborours" -- one <strong>of</strong> Whewell’s favorite phrases -- not only furthered the acquisition <strong>of</strong> accurate observational<br />

data, but they also built the scientific instruments, advanced methods <strong>of</strong> mathematical analysis,<br />

suggested new areas <strong>of</strong> research, <strong>and</strong> were the first to apply the results to the testing <strong>of</strong> theory. They<br />

were essential participants in British geophysical research. However, I also will demonstrate the manner<br />

in which the elite theorists in Britain effectively excluded the working classes from the scientific establishment,<br />

<strong>and</strong> thereby created the niche <strong>of</strong> the modern "scientist."<br />

Rice, Adrian<br />

E-mail Address: arice4@rmc.edu<br />

G.H. Hardy, the London Mathematical Society, <strong>and</strong> the rise <strong>of</strong> British pure mathematical research<br />

in the first half <strong>of</strong> the 20th century<br />

It has <strong>of</strong>ten been observed that the early years <strong>of</strong> the 20th century witnessed a significant <strong>and</strong> noticeable<br />

resurgence, both at home <strong>and</strong> abroad, in the research pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> British pure mathematicians. Invariably,<br />

in these observations, it is the name <strong>of</strong> G.H. Hardy (1877-1947) which features most prominently<br />

as the driving force behind this revival. But how accurate is this interpretation? For many years during<br />

this period Hardy occupied prominent positions in the London Mathematical Society, which grew<br />

considerably in size <strong>and</strong> stature at this time. The fact that the Society was de facto the mouthpiece <strong>of</strong> the<br />

British pure mathematical community, nationally <strong>and</strong> internationally, gives rise to a number <strong>of</strong> intriguing<br />

questions. In particular, to what extent were the changes in fortune <strong>of</strong> the London Mathematical Society<br />

<strong>and</strong> British pure mathematics connected, <strong>and</strong> how much can be directly attributed to Hardy? This paper<br />

is the first step in a re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> Hardy's influence on the British mathematical community, its international<br />

reputation <strong>and</strong> its pure mathematics, during the first half <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, with particular<br />

reference to his relationship with the London Mathematical Society.<br />

Richards, Joan<br />

E-mail Address: Joan_Richards@brown.edu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!