Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
keep Nordics <strong>and</strong> Anglo-Saxons safe from the contamination <strong>of</strong> other <strong>and</strong> ‘lesser’ orders. He spent most<br />
<strong>of</strong> his career attempting to prove his assertions through the collection <strong>of</strong> fossil evidence, <strong>and</strong> promoting<br />
his ideas to the wider world. His efforts included becoming active in the eugenics <strong>and</strong> immigration<br />
restriction movements as well as sponsoring the famous Central Asiatic Expeditions to ‘Outer Mongolia’<br />
led by Roy Chapman Andrews. This paper will examine the racial thinking in Osborn’s work <strong>and</strong> how it<br />
evolved over time.<br />
Reidy, Michael<br />
E-mail Address: mreidy@montana.edu<br />
'Scientists' <strong>and</strong> 'Subordinate Labourers': Class <strong>and</strong> the Creation <strong>of</strong> Victorian <strong>Science</strong><br />
William Whewell coined the term "scientist" in 1833 owing to the dramatic changes that occurred in<br />
science in the early Victorian era. Natural philosophers transformed our underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> light, heat,<br />
electricity <strong>and</strong> magnetism, <strong>and</strong> consolidated the fields <strong>of</strong> chemistry, physics, <strong>and</strong> geology. Furthermore,<br />
Susan Faye Cannon noted in this same period a change in focus to global, geophysical research in<br />
Britain. This changed natural philosophy in Britain from a limited <strong>and</strong> domestic undertaking, receiving<br />
parsimonious state support <strong>and</strong> embracing little communication among scientists <strong>of</strong> different nations, to<br />
a worldwide <strong>and</strong> relatively well-financed scientific practice that extended far beyond the confines <strong>of</strong><br />
Britain. Historians have since taken up Cannon’s initial analysis with enthusiasm, but they have failed<br />
to link this prevalent type <strong>of</strong> research to the broader trend <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionalization <strong>of</strong> the discipline. In this<br />
paper, I will demonstrate that Humboldtian initiatives relied on a broad base <strong>of</strong> support <strong>and</strong> a far-reaching<br />
network <strong>of</strong> observers that included large segments <strong>of</strong> the working classes. These "subordinate<br />
laborours" -- one <strong>of</strong> Whewell’s favorite phrases -- not only furthered the acquisition <strong>of</strong> accurate observational<br />
data, but they also built the scientific instruments, advanced methods <strong>of</strong> mathematical analysis,<br />
suggested new areas <strong>of</strong> research, <strong>and</strong> were the first to apply the results to the testing <strong>of</strong> theory. They<br />
were essential participants in British geophysical research. However, I also will demonstrate the manner<br />
in which the elite theorists in Britain effectively excluded the working classes from the scientific establishment,<br />
<strong>and</strong> thereby created the niche <strong>of</strong> the modern "scientist."<br />
Rice, Adrian<br />
E-mail Address: arice4@rmc.edu<br />
G.H. Hardy, the London Mathematical Society, <strong>and</strong> the rise <strong>of</strong> British pure mathematical research<br />
in the first half <strong>of</strong> the 20th century<br />
It has <strong>of</strong>ten been observed that the early years <strong>of</strong> the 20th century witnessed a significant <strong>and</strong> noticeable<br />
resurgence, both at home <strong>and</strong> abroad, in the research pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> British pure mathematicians. Invariably,<br />
in these observations, it is the name <strong>of</strong> G.H. Hardy (1877-1947) which features most prominently<br />
as the driving force behind this revival. But how accurate is this interpretation? For many years during<br />
this period Hardy occupied prominent positions in the London Mathematical Society, which grew<br />
considerably in size <strong>and</strong> stature at this time. The fact that the Society was de facto the mouthpiece <strong>of</strong> the<br />
British pure mathematical community, nationally <strong>and</strong> internationally, gives rise to a number <strong>of</strong> intriguing<br />
questions. In particular, to what extent were the changes in fortune <strong>of</strong> the London Mathematical Society<br />
<strong>and</strong> British pure mathematics connected, <strong>and</strong> how much can be directly attributed to Hardy? This paper<br />
is the first step in a re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> Hardy's influence on the British mathematical community, its international<br />
reputation <strong>and</strong> its pure mathematics, during the first half <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century, with particular<br />
reference to his relationship with the London Mathematical Society.<br />
Richards, Joan<br />
E-mail Address: Joan_Richards@brown.edu