Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
development <strong>of</strong> that theory opens a new perspective on the history <strong>of</strong> physics.<br />
Phillips, Denise<br />
E-mail Address: phillips@fas.harvard.edu<br />
The Generality <strong>of</strong> Language <strong>and</strong> the Particularity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>: Natural <strong>History</strong> <strong>and</strong> Classical<br />
Bildung in Germany, 1815-1850<br />
Over the first decades <strong>of</strong> the 19th century, interest in natural history exp<strong>and</strong>ed rapidly within German-speaking<br />
Europe, as natural scientific civic associations sprung up in towns across the German<br />
Confederation. Over the same period, however, attempts to win a greater place for natural history in the<br />
secondary school curriculum met with a great deal <strong>of</strong> resistance. According to natural history’s critics,<br />
this menial study <strong>of</strong> material particulars was entirely unsuited to the high moral mission <strong>of</strong> the German<br />
Gymnasium only the l<strong>of</strong>ty universals <strong>of</strong> Classical language study could properly mold the young pupil.<br />
As these school debates revealed, the moral status <strong>of</strong> natural history was ambiguous in mid-19th century<br />
Germany, <strong>and</strong> naturalists existed somewhat uneasily within the broader culture <strong>of</strong> erudition central to the<br />
German Bildungsbürgertum. Naturalists (<strong>and</strong> their allies inside the German liberal movement) lobbied to<br />
exp<strong>and</strong> the boundaries <strong>of</strong> humanist Bildung to include the study <strong>of</strong> nature. At the same time, many<br />
natural historians continued to draw on humanist traditions in their scientific work, <strong>of</strong>fering their research<br />
as practical examples that natural scientific <strong>and</strong> philological forms <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing could be<br />
compatible.<br />
Popa, Tiberiu<br />
E-mail Address: tmpst26+@pitt.edu<br />
Aristotle's Method <strong>of</strong> Division in 'Meteorology' IV<br />
Aristotle's h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>of</strong> diairesis (division) in his biological treatises has been a matter <strong>of</strong> intense<br />
debate. In the past scholars attempted to prove that the divisions to which Aristotle had appealed were<br />
comparable with methods <strong>of</strong> classification used in modern biology. More recently, scholars have turned<br />
their attention to the question whether the prescriptions Aristotle <strong>of</strong>fered in theoretical works are<br />
compatible with the various ways in which diairesis was put to work in specific biological contexts. I<br />
believe that further light can be shed on this problem by properly investigating Aristotle's 'chemical<br />
treatise' - book IV <strong>of</strong> his Meteorology, which has rightly been considered a prolegomenon to Aristotelian<br />
biology. The deployment <strong>of</strong> scientific method in this treatise has gone particularly understudied. The<br />
chief function <strong>of</strong> the book seems to be that <strong>of</strong> providing a reliable <strong>and</strong> clearly articulated (generic)<br />
classification <strong>of</strong> homoiomere or uniform materials. In Meteorology IV Aristotle consistently outlines<br />
classes <strong>of</strong> materials that share certain dispositional differentiae (e.g. 'meltables', 'cuttables') or a certain<br />
'chemical' composition (e.g. 'mostly earthy'). In doing so, he resorts to several differentiae simultaneously,<br />
to successive differentiation (i.e. differentiae logically entailing other differentiae), <strong>and</strong> even to<br />
negative distinctive properties (adunamiai). My main claim is that these features <strong>of</strong> the method <strong>of</strong><br />
division essentially conform to theoretical precepts put forth in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics <strong>and</strong><br />
coincide with crucial aspects <strong>of</strong> diairsesis in the biological treatises.<br />
Porter, Theodore<br />
E-mail Address: tporter@history.ucla.edu<br />
Statistics <strong>and</strong> the Unsalvageable Self<br />
Karl Pearson explained the virtues <strong>of</strong> science in moral <strong>and</strong> social terms, as providing means for<br />
excluding what is merely personal or biased, <strong>and</strong> preserving only what is equally valid for everyone. He<br />
developed this philosophical position in response to some very personal worries about egoism, supported<br />
also by his reading <strong>of</strong> literary works such as Ibsen's Doll's House <strong>and</strong> Meredith's The Egoist. The