14.01.2014 Views

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

development <strong>of</strong> that theory opens a new perspective on the history <strong>of</strong> physics.<br />

Phillips, Denise<br />

E-mail Address: phillips@fas.harvard.edu<br />

The Generality <strong>of</strong> Language <strong>and</strong> the Particularity <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>: Natural <strong>History</strong> <strong>and</strong> Classical<br />

Bildung in Germany, 1815-1850<br />

Over the first decades <strong>of</strong> the 19th century, interest in natural history exp<strong>and</strong>ed rapidly within German-speaking<br />

Europe, as natural scientific civic associations sprung up in towns across the German<br />

Confederation. Over the same period, however, attempts to win a greater place for natural history in the<br />

secondary school curriculum met with a great deal <strong>of</strong> resistance. According to natural history’s critics,<br />

this menial study <strong>of</strong> material particulars was entirely unsuited to the high moral mission <strong>of</strong> the German<br />

Gymnasium only the l<strong>of</strong>ty universals <strong>of</strong> Classical language study could properly mold the young pupil.<br />

As these school debates revealed, the moral status <strong>of</strong> natural history was ambiguous in mid-19th century<br />

Germany, <strong>and</strong> naturalists existed somewhat uneasily within the broader culture <strong>of</strong> erudition central to the<br />

German Bildungsbürgertum. Naturalists (<strong>and</strong> their allies inside the German liberal movement) lobbied to<br />

exp<strong>and</strong> the boundaries <strong>of</strong> humanist Bildung to include the study <strong>of</strong> nature. At the same time, many<br />

natural historians continued to draw on humanist traditions in their scientific work, <strong>of</strong>fering their research<br />

as practical examples that natural scientific <strong>and</strong> philological forms <strong>of</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing could be<br />

compatible.<br />

Popa, Tiberiu<br />

E-mail Address: tmpst26+@pitt.edu<br />

Aristotle's Method <strong>of</strong> Division in 'Meteorology' IV<br />

Aristotle's h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>of</strong> diairesis (division) in his biological treatises has been a matter <strong>of</strong> intense<br />

debate. In the past scholars attempted to prove that the divisions to which Aristotle had appealed were<br />

comparable with methods <strong>of</strong> classification used in modern biology. More recently, scholars have turned<br />

their attention to the question whether the prescriptions Aristotle <strong>of</strong>fered in theoretical works are<br />

compatible with the various ways in which diairesis was put to work in specific biological contexts. I<br />

believe that further light can be shed on this problem by properly investigating Aristotle's 'chemical<br />

treatise' - book IV <strong>of</strong> his Meteorology, which has rightly been considered a prolegomenon to Aristotelian<br />

biology. The deployment <strong>of</strong> scientific method in this treatise has gone particularly understudied. The<br />

chief function <strong>of</strong> the book seems to be that <strong>of</strong> providing a reliable <strong>and</strong> clearly articulated (generic)<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> homoiomere or uniform materials. In Meteorology IV Aristotle consistently outlines<br />

classes <strong>of</strong> materials that share certain dispositional differentiae (e.g. 'meltables', 'cuttables') or a certain<br />

'chemical' composition (e.g. 'mostly earthy'). In doing so, he resorts to several differentiae simultaneously,<br />

to successive differentiation (i.e. differentiae logically entailing other differentiae), <strong>and</strong> even to<br />

negative distinctive properties (adunamiai). My main claim is that these features <strong>of</strong> the method <strong>of</strong><br />

division essentially conform to theoretical precepts put forth in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics <strong>and</strong><br />

coincide with crucial aspects <strong>of</strong> diairsesis in the biological treatises.<br />

Porter, Theodore<br />

E-mail Address: tporter@history.ucla.edu<br />

Statistics <strong>and</strong> the Unsalvageable Self<br />

Karl Pearson explained the virtues <strong>of</strong> science in moral <strong>and</strong> social terms, as providing means for<br />

excluding what is merely personal or biased, <strong>and</strong> preserving only what is equally valid for everyone. He<br />

developed this philosophical position in response to some very personal worries about egoism, supported<br />

also by his reading <strong>of</strong> literary works such as Ibsen's Doll's House <strong>and</strong> Meredith's The Egoist. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!