14.01.2014 Views

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

explore the implications <strong>of</strong> this for morality <strong>and</strong> religion, an exercise that was simultaneously both<br />

empirical <strong>and</strong> normative. This paper explores some <strong>of</strong> these attempts among British writers <strong>of</strong> different<br />

intellectual orientation <strong>and</strong> ideological persuasion from the late nineteenth <strong>and</strong> early 20th centuries, e.g.<br />

Leslie Stephen, Benjamin Kidd, Herbert Spencer, Graham Wallas <strong>and</strong> F.H Bradley. The argument is that<br />

such thinkers encountered the dual qualities <strong>of</strong> Darwinism when applied to social existence as both<br />

model <strong>and</strong> threat. Darwinian nature seemed to provide a dynamic model for underst<strong>and</strong>ing human<br />

social interactions, but its focus on processes <strong>of</strong> selection, struggle <strong>and</strong> extirpation created dilemmas for<br />

moral virtues <strong>and</strong> domestic <strong>and</strong> international harmony. The tensions between these two features <strong>of</strong><br />

Darwinism are central to the attempts - <strong>and</strong> failure - to establish a Darwinian inspired evolutionary<br />

ethics.<br />

Haynes, Douglas<br />

E-mail Address: dhaynesd@uci.edu<br />

Theater <strong>of</strong> Malaria: Demonstrating Transmission in Rome <strong>and</strong> London, 1900<br />

"Theater <strong>of</strong> Malaria" focuses on the 1900 demonstration <strong>of</strong> the transmission <strong>of</strong> the malaria parasite<br />

through the bite <strong>of</strong> the mosquito. Although malaria was long represented as a sign <strong>of</strong> the backwardness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tropical world, the demonstrated <strong>of</strong> the mosquito-malaria relationship in fact occurred in Europe.<br />

Patrick Manson, medical adviser to the Colonial Office who was associated with the 1898 discovery <strong>of</strong><br />

the role <strong>of</strong> the mosquito in spreading plasmodia, organized a prophylaxis in Rome <strong>and</strong> human infection<br />

demonstration in London concurrently. The freedom from disease <strong>of</strong> the occupants <strong>of</strong> a mosquito-pro<strong>of</strong><br />

hut in Italy <strong>and</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> the clinical signs <strong>of</strong> disease in human subjects in Engl<strong>and</strong> bitten by<br />

mosquitoes imported from Italy together were designed to display the power <strong>of</strong> British science to control<br />

malaria <strong>and</strong> hence the tropical world. This study in imperial science not only shows the role <strong>of</strong> Londonbased<br />

scientists in the creation <strong>of</strong> knowledge about the periphery. It too reveals how the rhetorical<br />

representation <strong>of</strong> southern Italy as a European analogue to Africa framed the credibility or "truth-value"<br />

<strong>of</strong> the mosquito-malaria demonstration in Europe.<br />

Hecht, Jennifer<br />

E-mail Address: hechtjm@aol.com<br />

Atheism, Evolution, Nihilism, <strong>and</strong> a Transcendental Turn: The Question <strong>of</strong> Secular Ethics in<br />

France, 1870-1914<br />

The French Third Republic celebrated secularism <strong>and</strong> scientism <strong>and</strong> explicitly drew from these ideas<br />

the authority for its governance <strong>and</strong> the style <strong>of</strong> its swagger. A question <strong>of</strong> the grounds for morality<br />

emerged alongside this scientism. It affected a broad swath <strong>of</strong> intellectual, artistic, <strong>and</strong> political questions,<br />

varying in relation to levels <strong>of</strong> religious belief. Most <strong>of</strong> the population certainly seems to have<br />

believed in God, but in Paris in the 1880s <strong>and</strong> 1890s there was a very vocal, well-supported community<br />

<strong>of</strong> atheists. They were enthusiastic in their atheism, but very worried that civilization’s entire moral<br />

edifice was now without support. They either became oddly dedicated to a worldwide moral collapse, or<br />

they fought against it by showing that the old Judeo-Christian morality was actually somehow coded<br />

into the natural or social world. In Neo-Kantian <strong>and</strong> Bergsonian philosophy, evolutionary theory, Social<br />

Darwinism, <strong>and</strong> Durkheimian sociology, much <strong>of</strong> the most lasting <strong>and</strong> innovative work <strong>of</strong> the period<br />

was originally fashioned, at least in part, to address this crucial question <strong>of</strong> morality without God. For<br />

atheists the question was: How can we talk about good <strong>and</strong> evil now that God is gone? And for the much<br />

larger anticlerical community: How can we get citizens to choose good over evil without the invocation<br />

<strong>of</strong> God in the daily life <strong>of</strong> the state? Their varied <strong>and</strong> resourceful answers had considerable impact on<br />

the modern idea <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>and</strong> significantly influenced lines <strong>of</strong> academic, artistic, <strong>and</strong> political thought<br />

in the twentieth century.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!