Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
explore the implications <strong>of</strong> this for morality <strong>and</strong> religion, an exercise that was simultaneously both<br />
empirical <strong>and</strong> normative. This paper explores some <strong>of</strong> these attempts among British writers <strong>of</strong> different<br />
intellectual orientation <strong>and</strong> ideological persuasion from the late nineteenth <strong>and</strong> early 20th centuries, e.g.<br />
Leslie Stephen, Benjamin Kidd, Herbert Spencer, Graham Wallas <strong>and</strong> F.H Bradley. The argument is that<br />
such thinkers encountered the dual qualities <strong>of</strong> Darwinism when applied to social existence as both<br />
model <strong>and</strong> threat. Darwinian nature seemed to provide a dynamic model for underst<strong>and</strong>ing human<br />
social interactions, but its focus on processes <strong>of</strong> selection, struggle <strong>and</strong> extirpation created dilemmas for<br />
moral virtues <strong>and</strong> domestic <strong>and</strong> international harmony. The tensions between these two features <strong>of</strong><br />
Darwinism are central to the attempts - <strong>and</strong> failure - to establish a Darwinian inspired evolutionary<br />
ethics.<br />
Haynes, Douglas<br />
E-mail Address: dhaynesd@uci.edu<br />
Theater <strong>of</strong> Malaria: Demonstrating Transmission in Rome <strong>and</strong> London, 1900<br />
"Theater <strong>of</strong> Malaria" focuses on the 1900 demonstration <strong>of</strong> the transmission <strong>of</strong> the malaria parasite<br />
through the bite <strong>of</strong> the mosquito. Although malaria was long represented as a sign <strong>of</strong> the backwardness<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tropical world, the demonstrated <strong>of</strong> the mosquito-malaria relationship in fact occurred in Europe.<br />
Patrick Manson, medical adviser to the Colonial Office who was associated with the 1898 discovery <strong>of</strong><br />
the role <strong>of</strong> the mosquito in spreading plasmodia, organized a prophylaxis in Rome <strong>and</strong> human infection<br />
demonstration in London concurrently. The freedom from disease <strong>of</strong> the occupants <strong>of</strong> a mosquito-pro<strong>of</strong><br />
hut in Italy <strong>and</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> the clinical signs <strong>of</strong> disease in human subjects in Engl<strong>and</strong> bitten by<br />
mosquitoes imported from Italy together were designed to display the power <strong>of</strong> British science to control<br />
malaria <strong>and</strong> hence the tropical world. This study in imperial science not only shows the role <strong>of</strong> Londonbased<br />
scientists in the creation <strong>of</strong> knowledge about the periphery. It too reveals how the rhetorical<br />
representation <strong>of</strong> southern Italy as a European analogue to Africa framed the credibility or "truth-value"<br />
<strong>of</strong> the mosquito-malaria demonstration in Europe.<br />
Hecht, Jennifer<br />
E-mail Address: hechtjm@aol.com<br />
Atheism, Evolution, Nihilism, <strong>and</strong> a Transcendental Turn: The Question <strong>of</strong> Secular Ethics in<br />
France, 1870-1914<br />
The French Third Republic celebrated secularism <strong>and</strong> scientism <strong>and</strong> explicitly drew from these ideas<br />
the authority for its governance <strong>and</strong> the style <strong>of</strong> its swagger. A question <strong>of</strong> the grounds for morality<br />
emerged alongside this scientism. It affected a broad swath <strong>of</strong> intellectual, artistic, <strong>and</strong> political questions,<br />
varying in relation to levels <strong>of</strong> religious belief. Most <strong>of</strong> the population certainly seems to have<br />
believed in God, but in Paris in the 1880s <strong>and</strong> 1890s there was a very vocal, well-supported community<br />
<strong>of</strong> atheists. They were enthusiastic in their atheism, but very worried that civilization’s entire moral<br />
edifice was now without support. They either became oddly dedicated to a worldwide moral collapse, or<br />
they fought against it by showing that the old Judeo-Christian morality was actually somehow coded<br />
into the natural or social world. In Neo-Kantian <strong>and</strong> Bergsonian philosophy, evolutionary theory, Social<br />
Darwinism, <strong>and</strong> Durkheimian sociology, much <strong>of</strong> the most lasting <strong>and</strong> innovative work <strong>of</strong> the period<br />
was originally fashioned, at least in part, to address this crucial question <strong>of</strong> morality without God. For<br />
atheists the question was: How can we talk about good <strong>and</strong> evil now that God is gone? And for the much<br />
larger anticlerical community: How can we get citizens to choose good over evil without the invocation<br />
<strong>of</strong> God in the daily life <strong>of</strong> the state? Their varied <strong>and</strong> resourceful answers had considerable impact on<br />
the modern idea <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>and</strong> significantly influenced lines <strong>of</strong> academic, artistic, <strong>and</strong> political thought<br />
in the twentieth century.