Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The pursuit <strong>of</strong> Natural Knowledge in eighteenth century Britain was an important activity for producing<br />
personal <strong>and</strong> national identity. The importance <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society in the eighteenth century depended<br />
upon its role in articulating epistemological st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> serving state interests. By considering<br />
the antiquarian, military, <strong>and</strong> scientific works <strong>of</strong> William Roy (1726-1790) FRS, FSA, it is possible to<br />
explore the relationship <strong>of</strong> science to nation <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society to His Majesty’s Government in<br />
the British Enlightenment. In his antiquarian <strong>and</strong> scientific work Roy marshalled resources to define<br />
<strong>and</strong> narrate Britain as an historical <strong>and</strong> geographical truth. Combining the instrumental empiricism<br />
characteristic <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society with the organizational logic <strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong> Ordnance, he created a<br />
social pathway for other military engineers <strong>and</strong> cartographers while naturalizing the ideas <strong>of</strong> Britain <strong>and</strong><br />
Britishness. Roy, like Joseph Banks, was ever zealous in the cause <strong>of</strong> science‚ not only in service <strong>of</strong><br />
government, but also for the creation <strong>of</strong> his own social role. Roy’s movement in elite segments <strong>of</strong><br />
Georgian Britain provides an opportunity to address the network <strong>of</strong> institutional, intellectual, personal,<br />
<strong>and</strong> political commitments which supported scientific practice. His activities within the Royal Society<br />
reveal not only the tensions within British science, but also the ways in which the Society maintained its<br />
integrity as a social body <strong>and</strong> producer <strong>of</strong> reliable knowledge.<br />
Green Musselman, Elizabeth<br />
E-mail Address: greenmue@southwestern.edu<br />
Race <strong>and</strong> <strong>Science</strong>: Cape Colony Natural <strong>History</strong> as Hybrid Knowledge<br />
Until recently, most studies <strong>of</strong> science <strong>and</strong> imperialism have focused on a single expedition or scientist.<br />
However, as we know particularly from the recent wealth <strong>of</strong> studies on science in colonial India,<br />
Australia, <strong>and</strong> Africa, we get a very different picture <strong>of</strong> how colonial science forms when we plant<br />
ourselves within a colonial space, rather than simply following the Europeans as they trek to <strong>and</strong> from<br />
the imperial metropole. In this paper, I present some <strong>of</strong> the exciting possibilities that open up when we<br />
examine the development <strong>of</strong> sciences within one colonial space, in this case the Cape Colony under<br />
earlier British rule <strong>and</strong> occupation, ca. 1815-70. I will argue here that the process <strong>of</strong> cultivation, in every<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> that word, lay at the core <strong>of</strong> the Cape experience. Since the colony began as a garden to supply<br />
fresh food to passing ships, cultivation literally formed the colony’s raison d’etre. But cultivation also<br />
fueled the colony’s expansion <strong>and</strong> defined the colonial elite’s dreams for the European <strong>and</strong> African<br />
populations at the Cape. I will focus in this paper on nineteenth-century British Cape botanists’ visions<br />
<strong>of</strong> a cultivated South African society, <strong>and</strong> the extent to which Africans played a part in that cultivation,<br />
both as subjects <strong>of</strong> improvement <strong>and</strong> (usually unacknowledged) agents in the expansion <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
historical knowledge. Specifically, I argue that the primary purpose <strong>of</strong> botanical work in the Cape<br />
Colony was to encourage cultivation--both in the agricultural <strong>and</strong> in the cultural sense. My paper will<br />
respond particularly to two articles in the most recent Osiris volume: David Wade Chambers <strong>and</strong> Richard<br />
Gillespie's "Locality in the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>" <strong>and</strong> Harriet Deacon's "Racism <strong>and</strong> Medical <strong>Science</strong><br />
in South Africa's Cape Colony in the Mid- to Late Nineteenth Century."<br />
Greene, Mott<br />
E-mail Address: greene@ups.edu<br />
Attitudes Concerning Latitudes<br />
A useful example <strong>of</strong> the details <strong>of</strong> social construction is the evolution (between 1884 <strong>and</strong> 1928) <strong>of</strong> a<br />
classification scheme for the earth's climate regimes based (with varying emphases at different times) on<br />
agriculture, anthropology, geology, botany, rainfall, temperature, latitude, <strong>and</strong> proximity to the oceans.<br />
This scheme, invented by the German meteorologist Wladimir Köppen (1846-1940) still provides the<br />
basic structure geographers <strong>and</strong> climatologists use to discriminate climate zones. It has a peculiar history,<br />
beginning with Köppen's childhood experiences in Russia, <strong>and</strong> provides a beautiful example <strong>of</strong>