14.01.2014 Views

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

Listing of Sessions and Abstracts of Papers - History of Science ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The pursuit <strong>of</strong> Natural Knowledge in eighteenth century Britain was an important activity for producing<br />

personal <strong>and</strong> national identity. The importance <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society in the eighteenth century depended<br />

upon its role in articulating epistemological st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> serving state interests. By considering<br />

the antiquarian, military, <strong>and</strong> scientific works <strong>of</strong> William Roy (1726-1790) FRS, FSA, it is possible to<br />

explore the relationship <strong>of</strong> science to nation <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society to His Majesty’s Government in<br />

the British Enlightenment. In his antiquarian <strong>and</strong> scientific work Roy marshalled resources to define<br />

<strong>and</strong> narrate Britain as an historical <strong>and</strong> geographical truth. Combining the instrumental empiricism<br />

characteristic <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society with the organizational logic <strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong> Ordnance, he created a<br />

social pathway for other military engineers <strong>and</strong> cartographers while naturalizing the ideas <strong>of</strong> Britain <strong>and</strong><br />

Britishness. Roy, like Joseph Banks, was ever zealous in the cause <strong>of</strong> science‚ not only in service <strong>of</strong><br />

government, but also for the creation <strong>of</strong> his own social role. Roy’s movement in elite segments <strong>of</strong><br />

Georgian Britain provides an opportunity to address the network <strong>of</strong> institutional, intellectual, personal,<br />

<strong>and</strong> political commitments which supported scientific practice. His activities within the Royal Society<br />

reveal not only the tensions within British science, but also the ways in which the Society maintained its<br />

integrity as a social body <strong>and</strong> producer <strong>of</strong> reliable knowledge.<br />

Green Musselman, Elizabeth<br />

E-mail Address: greenmue@southwestern.edu<br />

Race <strong>and</strong> <strong>Science</strong>: Cape Colony Natural <strong>History</strong> as Hybrid Knowledge<br />

Until recently, most studies <strong>of</strong> science <strong>and</strong> imperialism have focused on a single expedition or scientist.<br />

However, as we know particularly from the recent wealth <strong>of</strong> studies on science in colonial India,<br />

Australia, <strong>and</strong> Africa, we get a very different picture <strong>of</strong> how colonial science forms when we plant<br />

ourselves within a colonial space, rather than simply following the Europeans as they trek to <strong>and</strong> from<br />

the imperial metropole. In this paper, I present some <strong>of</strong> the exciting possibilities that open up when we<br />

examine the development <strong>of</strong> sciences within one colonial space, in this case the Cape Colony under<br />

earlier British rule <strong>and</strong> occupation, ca. 1815-70. I will argue here that the process <strong>of</strong> cultivation, in every<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> that word, lay at the core <strong>of</strong> the Cape experience. Since the colony began as a garden to supply<br />

fresh food to passing ships, cultivation literally formed the colony’s raison d’etre. But cultivation also<br />

fueled the colony’s expansion <strong>and</strong> defined the colonial elite’s dreams for the European <strong>and</strong> African<br />

populations at the Cape. I will focus in this paper on nineteenth-century British Cape botanists’ visions<br />

<strong>of</strong> a cultivated South African society, <strong>and</strong> the extent to which Africans played a part in that cultivation,<br />

both as subjects <strong>of</strong> improvement <strong>and</strong> (usually unacknowledged) agents in the expansion <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

historical knowledge. Specifically, I argue that the primary purpose <strong>of</strong> botanical work in the Cape<br />

Colony was to encourage cultivation--both in the agricultural <strong>and</strong> in the cultural sense. My paper will<br />

respond particularly to two articles in the most recent Osiris volume: David Wade Chambers <strong>and</strong> Richard<br />

Gillespie's "Locality in the <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>" <strong>and</strong> Harriet Deacon's "Racism <strong>and</strong> Medical <strong>Science</strong><br />

in South Africa's Cape Colony in the Mid- to Late Nineteenth Century."<br />

Greene, Mott<br />

E-mail Address: greene@ups.edu<br />

Attitudes Concerning Latitudes<br />

A useful example <strong>of</strong> the details <strong>of</strong> social construction is the evolution (between 1884 <strong>and</strong> 1928) <strong>of</strong> a<br />

classification scheme for the earth's climate regimes based (with varying emphases at different times) on<br />

agriculture, anthropology, geology, botany, rainfall, temperature, latitude, <strong>and</strong> proximity to the oceans.<br />

This scheme, invented by the German meteorologist Wladimir Köppen (1846-1940) still provides the<br />

basic structure geographers <strong>and</strong> climatologists use to discriminate climate zones. It has a peculiar history,<br />

beginning with Köppen's childhood experiences in Russia, <strong>and</strong> provides a beautiful example <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!