14.01.2014 Views

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ured in tales <strong>of</strong> transmutation and haunting, include <strong>the</strong> quantitative harnessing <strong>of</strong> previously mysterious fluids such as electricity, magnetism,<br />

light and heat in post-Laplacean physics; <strong>the</strong> emergence <strong>of</strong> steam power in transport and heavy industry; and <strong>the</strong> eradication <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> old regime and <strong>the</strong> fitful cycle <strong>of</strong> revolution and reaction which followed it. In Freud’s famous <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uncanny, a “disquieting<br />

strangeness” is explained as <strong>the</strong> revelation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual psychic past in <strong>the</strong> reactions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present; my analysis will expand to<br />

include o<strong>the</strong>r cases in which distinct ways <strong>of</strong> worldmaking are brought into sudden and jarring contact: <strong>the</strong> encounter <strong>of</strong> distinct places<br />

(as in <strong>the</strong> Orientalism <strong>of</strong> Nerval), times (both in new speculative fictions and in <strong>the</strong> nostalgia <strong>of</strong> a lost aristocratic order), and worldviews<br />

(as in <strong>the</strong> “gestalt switch” <strong>of</strong> Kuhn’s <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> scientific change, figured in imagery <strong>of</strong> alchemy and bewitchment). Despite a fascination<br />

with mechanical processes <strong>of</strong> production and communication, in <strong>the</strong> pages <strong>of</strong> fantastic literature, a new image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> self, subject<br />

to overwhelming irrational forces, emerged; at <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> “literature” took shape, as <strong>the</strong> repository for “subjective”<br />

explorations <strong>of</strong> language and <strong>the</strong> human imagination. This paper situates mid-century images <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> automaton and related imagery in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir context, a history <strong>of</strong> mechanical subjectivity that connects new modes <strong>of</strong> understanding <strong>the</strong> self with new technologies for <strong>the</strong><br />

mastery <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />

Olga A. Valkova, S. I. Vavilov Institute for <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong> and Technology, Moscow (valkova@ihst.ru)<br />

Saturday, 20-Nov-04, 9:00 - 11:45 AM - Hill Country A<br />

Women Taking on <strong>the</strong> Role <strong>of</strong> Scientist in Nineteenth-Century Russia<br />

The decade <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>18</strong>60s served as a watershed in many aspects <strong>of</strong> social life in nineteenth-century Russia, including <strong>the</strong> establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cult <strong>of</strong> science among <strong>the</strong> public and <strong>the</strong> beginning <strong>of</strong> an active struggle for women’s equal access to higher education. But even<br />

before Russian women obtained legal rights for higher education, and before <strong>the</strong>y were allowed to work as college teachers or<br />

researchers, a number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m had already managed to establish <strong>the</strong>mselves as members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific community, including several<br />

women who were elected as corresponding members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> St. Petersburg Academy <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s. This paper examines <strong>the</strong> first generation<br />

<strong>of</strong> female scientists, revealing how <strong>the</strong>y came to accept and understand <strong>the</strong>ir newfound roles.<br />

Steven R. Vanden Broecke, The Johns Hopkins University (sbroecke@jhu.edu)<br />

Saturday, 20-Nov-04, 9:00 - 11:45 AM - Texas Ballroom V<br />

Disciplining Astrology: Notes on <strong>the</strong> Publication <strong>of</strong> Tycho Brahe’s World System (1588)<br />

Disciplinary “role-reversal” and courtly patronage contributed greatly to our understanding <strong>of</strong> Renaissance astronomy. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

motivations <strong>of</strong> courtly patrons in supporting disciplinary hooliganism are still a matter <strong>of</strong> contention. This paper seeks to advance this<br />

conversation by focusing on <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> Tycho Brahe’s geo-heliocentric system (1588). The latter is <strong>of</strong>ten portrayed as a “<strong>the</strong>oretical”<br />

event, seeking to contest or redefine various academic traditions <strong>of</strong> representing nature and supernature. As an alternative, I suggest<br />

that <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> Tycho’s world-system was a disciplining act aimed at <strong>the</strong> “practice” <strong>of</strong> judicial astrology. This interpretation<br />

avoids certain assumptions about <strong>the</strong> historical events surrounding Tycho’s publication and its performative function in a court setting<br />

that seem weakly supported.<br />

Holly C. VanScoy, Academic Research Associates (academres@aol.com)<br />

Saturday, 20-Nov-04, 1:30 - 3:10 PM - Hill Country A<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> The Psychological <strong>Science</strong>s in The Supreme Court’s Decision in Brown v. Board <strong>of</strong> Education<br />

An content analysis <strong>of</strong> psychology journals in <strong>the</strong> ten years before and after <strong>the</strong> landmark Supreme Court decision ending segregation<br />

is used to examine <strong>the</strong> extent to which scholarly research informed <strong>the</strong> decision, as well as <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> decision bolstered<br />

scholarly research. This analysis supports <strong>the</strong> conclusion that research in psychology was more impacted by <strong>the</strong> judicial decision than<br />

impactful <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> decision. Alternate interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results are also provided, including reflections on <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> scholarly journals<br />

and publication standards <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period.<br />

Charissa S. Varma, IHPST, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto (charissa.varma@utoronto.ca)<br />

Friday, 19-Nov-04, 1:30 - 3:10 PM - Hill Country C<br />

Early 19th Century Taxonomy and Essentialism: William Kirby’s Place in <strong>the</strong> <strong>History</strong> <strong>of</strong> Systematics<br />

Pre-Darwinian naturalists aimed to catalogue nature into efficient, practical information storage and retrieval systems that also attempted<br />

to reflect <strong>the</strong> real, natural order <strong>of</strong> living things. However, historians <strong>of</strong> systematics have focused not on <strong>the</strong>ir aims and practicality<br />

but on <strong>the</strong>ir metaphysics: <strong>the</strong>ir belief in <strong>the</strong> fixity <strong>of</strong> species created by God and <strong>the</strong>ir belief that <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> taxonomy is to discover<br />

<strong>the</strong> “essences” <strong>of</strong> species. Ernst Mayr has stressed that pre-Darwinian naturalists were essentialists. Arthur Cain’s argument that<br />

Linnaeus is a prime example <strong>of</strong> such a naturalist has been widely accepted. One would expect William Kirby <strong>the</strong> pious author <strong>of</strong> one<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bridgewater Treatises to fit this image perfectly. Yet Kirby’s claims in his great <strong>18</strong>02 monograph on bee taxonomy frustrate any<br />

attempt to squeeze him into <strong>the</strong> boxes Cain and Mayr have constructed. Kirby’s “Monographia Apum Angliae” uses a variety <strong>of</strong> “type<br />

concepts”, some <strong>of</strong> which resist this essentialist characterisation. While Kirby’s beliefs about species were certainly creationist, his<br />

methodology was quite unconstrained by his creationist worldview. More importantly, Kirby admired Linnaeus and adopted large portions<br />

<strong>of</strong> Linnaeus’s system precisely because he saw Linnaeus behaving in ways counter to our present understanding <strong>of</strong> essentialism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!