14.01.2014 Views

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Itinerants and Institutions: Popularizing <strong>Science</strong> in 19th-century Provincial Ireland<br />

In <strong>the</strong> early to mid-19th century, Ireland was an overwhelmingly rural country with few centers <strong>of</strong> industrial activity, poorly developed<br />

infrastructures and a population with only little access to education. Interest in science was, none<strong>the</strong>less, widespread, and most provincial<br />

centers supported Mechanics’ Institutes and various types <strong>of</strong> scientific societies. Local financial and intellectual resources were, however,<br />

rarely sufficient to sustain <strong>the</strong>se initiatives. Formal and informal networks <strong>of</strong> itinerant lecturers, demonstrators and instrument<br />

makers, including <strong>the</strong> government-sponsored Provincial Lecturers’ Scheme supplemented, stimulated and even enabled participation in<br />

science at <strong>the</strong> local level. Studying <strong>the</strong> interaction between local initiatives and government-sponsored and directed schemes for science<br />

education, this paper investigates access to science and <strong>the</strong> dissemination <strong>of</strong> scientific knowledge in provincial Ireland and contradicts<br />

<strong>the</strong> widespread assumption in Irish historiography that science was rejected as being an external, Protestant imposition and thus inherently<br />

un-Irish.<br />

Peter Neushul, University <strong>of</strong> California, Santa Barbara (pneushul@cox.net)<br />

Saturday, 20-Nov-04, 3:30 - 5:30 PM - Texas Ballroom II<br />

World War II War Production at Caltech: The Rocket Program<br />

Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s “Arsenal <strong>of</strong> Democracy” marshaled <strong>the</strong> talents <strong>of</strong> American scientists in both industry and academe.<br />

Wartime research yielded revolutionary new technologies that changed <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> World War II. Universities made a substantial<br />

contribution, building new laboratories with funds from <strong>the</strong> U.S. government. Traditionally academic scientists focused on basic and<br />

applied scientific problems with occasional interest in technology. During WW II this dynamic changed significantly as University<br />

researchers performed basic research, developed technologies and even fostered <strong>the</strong>ir mass production. This “scaling up process,” <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

associated with industry, was particularly effective at <strong>the</strong> California Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology (Caltech) where an elite team <strong>of</strong> researchers<br />

designed, tested, and produced rockets for <strong>the</strong> U.S. Navy beginning in 1940. In less than five years, Caltech’s High Velocity Air Rocket<br />

and Tiny Tim went from conceptual design to testing and mass production. Immediately following World War II <strong>the</strong>se technologies led<br />

to <strong>the</strong> WAC Corporal program that put <strong>the</strong> first rocket beyond <strong>the</strong> Earth’s atmosphere and fostered new aerospace industries in<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn California. Caltech’s wartime success also produced a long term relationship between <strong>the</strong> University, government, and industry<br />

that characterized post-war U.S. science and technology policy.<br />

Keith A. Nier, Independent Scholar/ Chemical Heritage Foundation (nierfam@verizon.net)<br />

Friday, 19-Nov-04, 3:30 - 5:30 PM - Texas Ballroom II<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Mass Spectrometry: Weighing Ions and <strong>the</strong> Nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>Science</strong><br />

The creation, successful growth, and extreme diversification <strong>of</strong> mass spectrometry has been a major feature <strong>of</strong> a multitude <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

and technological fields over <strong>the</strong> past hundred years. Never<strong>the</strong>less, this kind <strong>of</strong> work usually has been barely mentioned in history <strong>of</strong><br />

science and given even less attention by those pr<strong>of</strong>fering accounts <strong>of</strong> science in general. General understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong><br />

modern science has been seriously skewed by this oversight. A brief survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> continuously multi-national and multi-disciplinary<br />

development <strong>of</strong> mass spectrometry will indicate <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> this range <strong>of</strong> scientific and technological work. Almost <strong>the</strong> whole<br />

<strong>of</strong> recent science is tied into <strong>the</strong> overall story, along with much industrial and governmental history, with interesting implications <strong>of</strong><br />

many sorts. In <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> mass spectrometry one can see sophisticated specialization produce unity <strong>of</strong> science and social construction<br />

lead to objectivity and commensurability. This overview will illustrate how differently, even old fashioned, science can appear when<br />

one takes seriously scientific work that is characterized primarily by measurement, not just experiment, by determinations <strong>of</strong> fact ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

than just tests <strong>of</strong> explanations, and by technical capabilities as much (or more) as by <strong>the</strong>oretical perspectives.<br />

Ca<strong>the</strong>rine Nisbett, Princeton University (cnisbett@princeton.edu)<br />

Friday, 19-Nov-04, 9:00 - 11:45 AM - Texas Ballroom V<br />

Marriage and Widowhood in Amateur Astronomy<br />

When Anna Palmer married Henry Draper in <strong>18</strong>67, she married into an astronomical family. Both Henry and his fa<strong>the</strong>r John had earned<br />

reputations for <strong>the</strong>mselves in <strong>the</strong> American scientific community. Anna and Henry’s first days toge<strong>the</strong>r were spent shopping for <strong>the</strong><br />

glass that Henry would grind into a 24-inch lens, and <strong>the</strong>y went on to spend every clear night toge<strong>the</strong>r at <strong>the</strong>ir observatory in Hastingson-Hudson.<br />

Henry died suddenly in <strong>18</strong>82, and for a time Anna tried to continue his work herself before being forced to relinquish her<br />

dream and several thousand dollars to <strong>the</strong> Henry Draper Memorial at Harvard College Observatory. This paper will explore how Henry<br />

and Anna worked toge<strong>the</strong>r and what <strong>the</strong>y produced at <strong>the</strong>ir observatory, what it meant for <strong>the</strong>m that he was an important amateur, and<br />

what place she carved out for herself after his death. Their story will contribute to one already begus with Helena Pycior’s edited volume<br />

Creative Couples in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Science</strong>s, and will extend <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Draper’s partnership into Anna’s widowhood.<br />

Joe November, Princeton University (november@princeton.edu)<br />

Friday, 19-Nov-04, 3:30 - 5:30 PM - Hill Country C<br />

DENDRAL: Automating Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis Formation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!