14.01.2014 Views

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

Abstracts of the History of Science Society 2004 Austin Meeting 18 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

magic encompassed (including alchemy and astrology), <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> texts in which such accounts appeared (e.g.iatrochemical disputes,<br />

natural histories, life-writings, histories <strong>of</strong> Britain), and exploring <strong>the</strong> extent to which some authors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se works thought that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

world was disenchanted while o<strong>the</strong>rs compiled evidence(historical, material, anecdotal) to <strong>the</strong> contrary.<br />

Allison B. Kavey, Gonzaga University (akavey@yahoo.com)<br />

Saturday, 20-Nov-04, 3:30 - 5:30 PM - Hill Country C<br />

Structuring Nature: Scripting <strong>the</strong> Natural in “The Secrets <strong>of</strong> Albertus Magnus” and “Cornucopiae, or Divers Secrets”<br />

Books <strong>of</strong> secrets in sixteenth century England provide an excellent opportunity to access popular depictions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural world and<br />

images <strong>of</strong> natural philosophy. The Secrets <strong>of</strong> Albertus Magnus and Cornucopiae, or divers secrets are particularly useful for this task, since <strong>the</strong>y<br />

produce broad images <strong>of</strong> nature and give specific instructions for its manipulation by careful readers. This paper will examine <strong>the</strong> ways<br />

in which each book’s structure contributes to its depiction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural world and its position on <strong>the</strong> appropriate use <strong>of</strong> natural knowledge<br />

by a broad range <strong>of</strong> readers.<br />

Christine Keiner, Rochester Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology (cmkgsh@rit.edu)<br />

Friday, 19-Nov-04, 1:30 - 3:10 PM - Hill Country C<br />

Rats, Humans, and Urban Ecology: The Johns Hopkins Rodent Ecology Project, 1944-1952<br />

This study focuses on <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a new sub-discipline—rodent ecology—which flourished at <strong>the</strong> Johns Hopkins School <strong>of</strong><br />

Hygiene and Public Health from <strong>the</strong> mid-1940s through <strong>the</strong> early 1950s. Thanks to a partnership between Hopkins, <strong>the</strong> Rockefeller<br />

Foundation, and Baltimore City, <strong>the</strong> Rodent Ecology Project researchers made pioneering discoveries about rat population dynamics,<br />

populations in general, and urban rat control. Although environmental sanitation had been all but eclipsed by <strong>the</strong> new public health<br />

tools <strong>of</strong> pesticides and antibiotics, <strong>the</strong> complex behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> urban rat meant that those who sought to apply pesticide technology<br />

to infested city blocks could not ignore <strong>the</strong> ecological relationships between rats, humans, and <strong>the</strong> urban environment. Consequently, I<br />

argue that <strong>the</strong> Rodent Ecology Project highlights early efforts to apply an ecological approach to <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> urban nature.<br />

Boumsoung Kim, The University <strong>of</strong> Tokyo (kimbs@mr.rcast.u-tokyo.ac.jp)<br />

Friday, 19-Nov-04, 1:30 - 3:10 PM - Hill Country B<br />

Representing Earthquakes: A Historical Interpretation <strong>of</strong> Seismograms in Meiji Japan<br />

In this presentation, I would like to discuss <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> Japanese seismology from <strong>the</strong> <strong>18</strong>80s to <strong>the</strong> 1900s by interpreting visual representations.<br />

They include not only representations <strong>of</strong> earthquakes such as sketches and seismic diagrams, but also <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

works such as statistical tables, graphs, and maps. It has been said that Japanese science before <strong>the</strong> 1920s generally was located at<br />

<strong>the</strong> periphery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> international scientific community, and seismology was not an exception. Many scholars have retrospectively<br />

described seismological research until <strong>the</strong> 1910s as a local science, which had been conducted before Japanese science developed fully<br />

to <strong>the</strong> “international” level. I would like to inquire into this general evaluation. I hope that <strong>the</strong> visual representations will make it more<br />

visible by whom, where, and how <strong>the</strong> research was conducted, which would fur<strong>the</strong>r show us <strong>the</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> raw data, processed information,<br />

and scientific authority.<br />

Nahum Kipnis, Independent scholar (nahumk@mn.rr.com)<br />

Saturday, 20-Nov-04, 1:30 - 3:10 PM - Hill Country D<br />

Are Old Scientific Theories “Rejected” or “Abandoned”?<br />

To describe <strong>the</strong> process by which an old scientific <strong>the</strong>ory yields to a new one historians and philosophers <strong>of</strong> science usually use such<br />

words as “refutation,” “rejection,” and “confirmation.” In particular, <strong>the</strong>re is an opinion that a <strong>the</strong>ory is “rejected” after being found<br />

“refuted.” It is not always clear, however, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se terms refer to actual contemporary views or to scholars’ interpretations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

contemporary reaction. I will present examples from <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> electricity and optics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eighteenth and <strong>the</strong> early nineteenth<br />

centuries, which show that, whatever <strong>the</strong> appearances, <strong>the</strong> choice between two <strong>the</strong>ories was actually made primarily on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> positive<br />

evidence ra<strong>the</strong>r than a negative one. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> main factor affecting scientists’ choice was a constructive capacity <strong>of</strong> a<br />

<strong>the</strong>ory ra<strong>the</strong>r than its deficiencies. From this perspective, a replacement <strong>of</strong> one <strong>the</strong>ory by ano<strong>the</strong>r consisted <strong>of</strong> a decrease in using <strong>the</strong><br />

former and an increased use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter. If this were <strong>the</strong> case, “abandonment” would describe <strong>the</strong> fate <strong>of</strong> an old <strong>the</strong>ory better than<br />

its “refutation” and “rejection.”<br />

Jeremy Kirby, Florida State University (Jsk4806@mailer.fsu.edu)<br />

Friday, 19-Nov-04, 1:30 - 3:10 PM - Big Bend A, B, & C

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!