13.01.2014 Views

By: Joe Attokaren Bo Seo - Health Systems Institute

By: Joe Attokaren Bo Seo - Health Systems Institute

By: Joe Attokaren Bo Seo - Health Systems Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>By</strong>:<br />

<strong>Joe</strong> <strong>Attokaren</strong><br />

<strong>Bo</strong> <strong>Seo</strong><br />

12/15/06


Table of Contents<br />

Table of Contents .....................................................................................................2<br />

Executive Summary .................................................................................................3<br />

Figure 1: Storage Solution .....................................................................................................................3<br />

Figure 2: Patient Room Layouts with Storage Solutions .......................................................................4<br />

Introduction..............................................................................................................5<br />

Methodology .............................................................................................................5<br />

Figure 3: Outline of Methodology .........................................................................................................5<br />

Formulate Problem................................................................................................................... 5<br />

Observations ........................................................................................................................... 5<br />

Interviews................................................................................................................................ 6<br />

Surveys.................................................................................................................................... 7<br />

Develop Solution........................................................................................................................ 7<br />

Literature Review.................................................................................................................... 7<br />

Family Needs ...................................................................................................................... 7<br />

Family Trends ..................................................................................................................... 8<br />

Transportation Cabin Design .............................................................................................. 8<br />

Design Development............................................................................................................... 9<br />

Analyze Data....................................................................................................................... 9<br />

Table 1: Summary of Data.....................................................................................................................9<br />

Chart 1: Satisfied?................................................................................................................................10<br />

Chart 2: Family Activities....................................................................................................................10<br />

Focus on a Key Problem................................................................................................... 11<br />

Table 2: Key Behaviors .......................................................................................................................11<br />

Table 3: Storage Definer......................................................................................................................12<br />

Newer Designs.................................................................................................................. 13<br />

Figure 4: New Family Area Designs....................................................................................................13<br />

Develop Scenarios to Test ................................................................................................ 14<br />

Develop Drawings ................................................................................................................ 14<br />

Design Furniture ............................................................................................................... 14<br />

Figure 5: Storage Solution ...................................................................................................................14<br />

Draw on AutoCAD ........................................................................................................... 15<br />

Figure 6: Patient Room Layouts with Storage Solutions .....................................................................15<br />

Build & Test.......................................................................................................................... 15<br />

Figure 7: Pictures of Final project .......................................................................................................15<br />

Conclusion.............................................................................................................. 16<br />

Feedback .................................................................................................................................. 17<br />

Figure 8: Comments.............................................................................................................................18<br />

Next Steps ................................................................................................................................ 18<br />

Acknowledgements................................................................................................ 19<br />

Attachments........................................................................................................... 20<br />

Figure 9: Survey Template ..................................................................................................................20<br />

Transportation Cabin Design – Literature Review ............................................................. 21<br />

Human Dimensions................................................................................................................. 24<br />

2


Executive Summary<br />

Problem: Reduce Clutter caused by Family Members<br />

Our group focused on the Family Space of the Patient Room. One of the key problems in<br />

this area was the lack of useful storage. Because of this, clutter was inevitable. Clutter opposes<br />

many problems. First, it interferes with clinical functions of health care providers. Second, it<br />

creates an unsatisfied atmosphere among the visitors of the hospital. The goal of our project<br />

was to address the clutter issue by understanding the family needs and behaviors. This was done<br />

through extensive observations and literature studies. Our overall goal was to provide sufficient<br />

storage solutions for family brought items and make maximum use of each square foot.<br />

Solution: Developed key pieces of furniture that provide sufficient amount of storage for family<br />

brought items while making optimal use of each square foot. Our final result was a family space<br />

of 70 sq ft.<br />

Figure 1: Storage Solution<br />

3


Goal: Provide sufficient storage solutions for family brought items and making maximum use of<br />

each square foot.<br />

Figure 2: Patient Room Layouts with Storage Solutions<br />

4


Introduction<br />

The Family Space of patient rooms tends to not fulfill the needs or the expectation of the<br />

family members and our group wanted to address this problem. We formulated a systematic<br />

process to identify the issues and develop solutions to solve them.<br />

Methodology<br />

Figure 3: Outline of Methodology<br />

Formulate Problem<br />

We used observations, interviews, and surveys to help identify the problems/issues with<br />

current Family Space. The observations, interviews, and surveys were done at different hospitals<br />

at different times of the week. The hospitals include Emory, DeKalb Medical Center, and<br />

Hillandale.<br />

Observations<br />

Our observations showed us that family items tend to be dispersed throughout the whole<br />

patient room. Closets and all surface areas were filled to capacity. This made it hard for people<br />

5


to move around within the room which is a potential problem when giving or receiving care.<br />

Nurses would often have to go out their way to treat patients either by moving family objects or<br />

working around it. Family items in a sense were affecting overall quality of care for their loved<br />

one.<br />

Interviews<br />

Most of the interviews showed that many of the family members were not satisfied with the<br />

current Family Space. Unsatisfied family members tend to add stress to both patient and nursing<br />

staff. Willingness to recommend is an important factor for hospitals to retain business and<br />

unsatisfied family members will definitely not recommend hospitals that they were not too<br />

pleased about.<br />

Our interviews also showed that family members would like to have access to a facility guide<br />

which shows them where the bathroom, gift store, vending machines and other sort of local facts<br />

about the facility and the neighboring area. Facility guide would be sort of be like a hotel<br />

information booklet in which it provides information about the facility and the neighboring areas<br />

around it.<br />

Another problem relates to the uncomfortable furniture in the Family Space. It’s hard for<br />

families to be comfortable if their bed isn’t comfortable. Often they wished that furniture was<br />

better and bigger.<br />

Many of the family members preferred a more homelike feel compared to the more<br />

institutional feel.<br />

6


Surveys<br />

After our first round of observations and interviews, a survey was developed based on our<br />

results of the observations and interviews. This survey helped address the key issues in the<br />

family space in a more organized format by finding out what was the room inventory for the<br />

visitor, what type of activities do the visitors partake in while in the patient room and identifies<br />

key items that were brought. A summary of the results from all observations, interviews, and<br />

surveys are located in the Analyze Data section under Design Development. The Survey<br />

Template is shown in the Attachment section.<br />

Develop Solution<br />

Literature Review<br />

Family Needs<br />

When working with the Family Space, we need to understand family needs. We looked for<br />

studies that examined this.<br />

List references<br />

Hummelinck, Alda and Pollock, Kristian. ”Parents’ information needs about the treat of their<br />

chronically ill child: A qualitative study.” Patient Education and Counseling 62 (2006):<br />

228-234.<br />

Takman, Christina and Severinsoon Elisabeth. “A description of healthcare providers’<br />

perceptions of the needs of significant others in intensive care units in Norway and<br />

Sweden.” Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 22 (2006): 228-238.<br />

Belciug, Marian P. “Concerns and anticipated challenges of family caregivers following<br />

participation in the neuropsychological feedback of stroke patients.” International Journal<br />

of Rehabilitation Research 29 (2006): 77-80.<br />

7


Family Trends<br />

When working with the Family Space, we wanted to see how families are changing now and<br />

what they would be like in the future. Family trends will be incorporate in our future design so<br />

that our design will be useful now and in the long run as well. The literature showed a reduction<br />

in family size and increasing likelihood of having both parents working.<br />

List references<br />

http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hh-fam/cps2005.html<br />

http://www.pbs.org/livelyhood/workingfamily/familytrends.html<br />

http://familyimpactseminars.org/trends.htm<br />

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14942047/<br />

Transportation Cabin Design<br />

Some of these Family Space issues have already been address in transportation cabin design.<br />

We wanted to find out how and why designs are the way they are for many different types of<br />

transportation: ships, planes, and trains. These transportation cabins address people/family needs<br />

and work with a limited space which relates greatly to family space in patient room of a hospital.<br />

Tight Spaces that work is a phrase that expresses this idea.<br />

List references<br />

Located in the Attachment section.<br />

Other Sites Related Patient Rooms<br />

http://www.onedreamdesign.com/humanspace/tile.shtml<br />

http://www.sccm.org/sccm/publications/critical+connections/archives/april+2005/designapril05.<br />

htm<br />

http://www.wbdg.org/design/hospital.php<br />

http://www.rwjf.org/newsroom/newsreleasesdetail.jsp?id=10298<br />

http://www.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2004-06-07-hospital-of-future_x.htm<br />

http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/aug2006/id20060815_289604.htm?chan=innova<br />

tion_spr_medical<br />

http://www.aia.org/SiteObjects/files/04_Review_and_Anal_Literature.pdf<br />

8


Design Development<br />

In this stage, we analyzed our data from the observations, interviews, and surveys. The<br />

development of statistics and graphs from the data helped us grasp the problems at hand. Along<br />

with out Literature Review, we were able to focus on a key problem clutter to solve.<br />

Analyze Data<br />

Number of Observations/Surveys 14<br />

Total<br />

Summary of Survey/Observation Data<br />

Average<br />

# of Visitors Now 1.50<br />

Preferred # of Visitors 3.56<br />

# of Overnight Visitors 0.71<br />

Preferred # of Overnight Visitors 1.67<br />

The number of Observations/Surveys represents<br />

14 different rooms not individual family members<br />

because some of the rooms contained more than<br />

one guest at a time.<br />

Room Inventory Average Items Brought % "Yes"<br />

Work Desk 42.9% Bag (ie purse, suitcase) 100.0%<br />

Bed 85.7% Clothes 69.2%<br />

# Seating 2.21 Toiletries 69.2%<br />

Table 100.0% Hairdryer/Flat Iron 11.1%<br />

Closet 92.9% Laptop 33.3%<br />

TV 100.0% DVDs 33.3%<br />

Sink 50.0% Reading Material 60.0%<br />

<strong>Bo</strong>ard Games or puzzles 10.0%<br />

Visitor Activities % "Yes" Food 54.5%<br />

Sleep 69.2% Drinks 50.0%<br />

Eat 66.7% Pillows 11.1%<br />

Talk to Staff 100.0% Linens 0.0%<br />

Monitor Patient 100.0%<br />

Monitor Care 91.7% Satisfied?<br />

Work 20.0% Yes 33.3%<br />

Read 75.0% No 66.7%<br />

Watch TV 83.3%<br />

Socialize 91.7%<br />

All Information Is Considering Only Visitors<br />

Table 1: Summary of Data<br />

9


Satisfied With Current Family Zone?<br />

Yes, 33%<br />

Yes<br />

No<br />

No, 67%<br />

Chart 1: Satisfied?<br />

Main Family Current Activities<br />

Socialize<br />

Watch TV<br />

Read<br />

Work<br />

Monitor Care<br />

Monitor Patient<br />

Talk to Staff<br />

Eat<br />

Sleep<br />

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%<br />

% of Families that do each activity<br />

Chart 2: Family Activities<br />

10


Focus on a Key Problem<br />

This was a big step for our group. Instead of solving all Family Space problems with the<br />

limited time frame, we decided just on focusing on a key problem: clutter. This problem can be<br />

easily solved by adding more space and storage in the family area. However, we felt that this<br />

wasn’t enough. Our data should us key behaviors and essential items for these key behaviors.<br />

This was then analyzed to provide the right storage solution.<br />

How Current Key Behaviors Relate To Items Within The Patient Room<br />

Key<br />

Behaviors<br />

Room Inventory<br />

Surveys/<br />

Observations Work Desk Bed Seating Table Closet TV Sink<br />

Talk to Staff 100.0% N N N N N N N<br />

Monitor<br />

Patient 100.0% N N Y N N N N<br />

Monitor Care 91.7% N N N N N N N<br />

Socialize 91.7% N N Y N N N N<br />

Watch TV 83.3% N N Y N N Y N<br />

Read 75.0% N N Y N N N N<br />

Sleep 69.2% N Y N N N N Y<br />

Eat 66.7% Y N Y Y N N Y<br />

Work 20.0% Y N Y N N N N<br />

Shows what furniture is needed<br />

Table 2: Key Behaviors<br />

11


Essential Items For Key<br />

Behavior<br />

Visibility/<br />

Security<br />

Storage Definer<br />

Vertical<br />

Placement<br />

Quantity<br />

Storage size<br />

Purse A<br />

Cellphone A anywhere<br />

Suitcase, Duffle Bag,<br />

Backpack<br />

INV<br />

L<br />

One backpack and one roll<br />

on suitecase per person<br />

square footage to place<br />

Clothes V Roll on suitcase full closet and drawer for underwear<br />

Toiletries INV M a large shaving bag laptop size drawer<br />

Dirty Clothes INV L Grocery bag drawer<br />

Hairdryer/Flat Iron L one each laptop size drawer<br />

Food, Drink M opened togo box and large drink<br />

Magazine, <strong>Bo</strong>oks, Newspaper V H 2 or 3 magzine or books shelve for books and magazine<br />

Laptop INV,S,A M laptop size shelve<br />

Dvd Player 5 dvds portable dvd player size<br />

<strong>Bo</strong>ard Games And Puzzles V H 2 or 3 Shelf<br />

Family Photo V M/H 2 or 3 Photo Frames Shelf<br />

Pillow, Linen V H I blanket, 1 Sheet, 1 Pillow leave on sofa<br />

Column Names<br />

Description<br />

Essential Items For Key Behavior List of Items<br />

Visibility/Security<br />

Should the Item be Visible (V) or Invisible (INV) or Secure (S) or Unsecure (U)<br />

Vertical Placement<br />

What level should the Item be placed (considering access): Low (L), Medium (M), High (H)<br />

Quantity<br />

Description of how much<br />

Storage size<br />

Description of space needed<br />

Key<br />

Accessible A Unsecure U<br />

Visible V Low L<br />

Invisible INV Medium M<br />

Secure S High H<br />

Table 3: Storage Definer<br />

12


While addressing the clutter issue, we also want to make optimal use of family space. This<br />

can be done by maximizing the usefulness of each square foot. We used human dimension<br />

charts (located in the Attachment Section) to help identify specific dimensions for our designs.<br />

Newer Designs<br />

It was important to analyze newer patient room designs and newer furniture as well to make<br />

sure that they didn’t already address the clutter issue. Most of the newer designs did address the<br />

clutter issue and solved it by providing more space and more storage. Even though this solves<br />

the clutter problem, we felt that it didn’t address it appropriately. We believe too much space<br />

was wasted and not utilized efficiently and that money was wasted as well building these designs.<br />

We studied some new patient room designs from <strong>Health</strong>care Design Magazine. For the newer<br />

furniture we looked at the latest at IOA <strong>Health</strong>care Furniture and Stryker Furniture.<br />

Figure 4: New Family Area Designs<br />

13


Develop Scenarios to Test<br />

We wanted to make realistic testing scenarios to make sure our final design works.<br />

Scenario 1:<br />

A wife walks in to see her loved one who became really sick after an infection.<br />

She is a teacher.<br />

Needs to grade papers and write emails while staying close to her husband.<br />

Decides to stay overnight.<br />

Scenario 2:<br />

A sick grandmother is spending her final days in the hospital.<br />

Her only son comes to visit her and he brings his kids (2).<br />

The son needs keep up with work and the kids need to do school work and play<br />

Develop Drawings<br />

Design Furniture<br />

From our storage definer chart, we developed 3 key types of furniture that met all its needs.<br />

Figure 5: Storage Solution<br />

14


Draw on AutoCAD<br />

These drawings were then placed in AutoCAD to find the optimal space for our Family<br />

Space Design. Suggested human dimensions were obtained from a book source see Attachments.<br />

Figure 6: Patient Room Layouts with Storage Solutions<br />

Build & Test<br />

The AutoCAD drawings were then used as blueprints to our final project mockup.<br />

Figure 7: Pictures of Final project<br />

15


Conclusion<br />

Our final design consisted of 3 key pieces of furniture that considered the many key<br />

behaviors of family members and their essential items that they bring. The final optimal square<br />

footage was determined to be 70 sq ft. The test process is really the next step for us to do if we<br />

had more time. The test would either show or not show validity in the optimal square footage of<br />

70 sq ft. This project was quite challenging. One of the hardest things about the project was<br />

focusing on a single key issue. For most of the semester, we tried to fix all the problems and this<br />

wasn’t a good approach because of the complexity of the area and the lack of time we had to<br />

complete the project. Once we were able to focus, the project started coming together and it was<br />

easier to see where we are going. In the end, it was a learning process for both us.<br />

16


Feedback<br />

Evaluation Summary<br />

Patient Room of the Future<br />

Project Title:<br />

Description:<br />

Goal:<br />

Family Space Matters<br />

Reduce Clutter caused by Family<br />

Members<br />

Provide sufficient storage<br />

solutions for family brought<br />

items and making maximum<br />

use of each square foot<br />

Each Score shows how each attribute is addressed by the project. The<br />

scale used is a range between 1-5 with 5 meaning that it completely<br />

addressed the attribute and 1 not addressing the attribute at all.<br />

Total surveys: 11<br />

Average Score<br />

Improves Quality of Care 3.91<br />

Measurable/Combines Design & Research 4.82<br />

Functional 4.82<br />

Adaptable/Customizable 4.64<br />

Represents Multi-Disciplinary Collaboration 4.55<br />

Increases Efficiency for Families 4.82<br />

Would you like to stay here? (Yes) 82%<br />

Surveys were collected on 12/7/06<br />

Table 4: Evaluation Summary<br />

17


Comments:<br />

Lots of places to put belongings away<br />

Very functional + Welcoming for non-patients<br />

Lots of thought to amount and location for<br />

best convenient storage<br />

The different configuration options are a nice touch<br />

Yes, I can sleep, work, and store my stuff<br />

More comfortable than current chairs for sleeping<br />

May be hard to fit in hospital rooms but 70 sq ft is an<br />

impressively efficient use of space.<br />

Could also apply to Nursing Facilities and Visitor<br />

Space<br />

Could a visitor with a mobility limitation get around<br />

this space?<br />

Table might need slight adjustment.<br />

It looks like there is plenty of storage space and<br />

room to move around<br />

Figure 8: Comments<br />

Next Steps<br />

If we had more time we would like to try building the furniture out of better materials like wood<br />

and consider better ergonomics in our furniture design. It would be nice to have an ID student to<br />

help us with the building process. Then we would like to test the area ourselves by each of us<br />

spending at least one day and night in the space and try to do our everyday activities. From our<br />

experience, we’ll modify our end product and then try to bring the people we interviewed and<br />

surveyed and see if our design meets their needs. We’ll ask them:<br />

Does this space work?<br />

What needs to be improved?<br />

Their input will be vital to the final result. More data and literature reviews would also be<br />

helpful.<br />

18


Acknowledgements<br />

We would like to thank all the professors/faculty for helping us out throughout the project<br />

development (no particular order): Joyce Bromberg from Steelcase, Craig Zimring, Abir<br />

Mullick, June Connor, Gerri Lamb, David Cowan, Claudia Winegarden, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, and<br />

Paula Peche. This project was quite difficult but in the end we got somewhere!<br />

Providers of Materials: HomeDepot, Sam Flax, IKEA, and Styker.<br />

THANK YOU!!<br />

19


Attachments<br />

Date<br />

Place<br />

Room #<br />

Separated Family Zone? (Yes or No)<br />

# of people present now (not patient/baby)<br />

# of people would like at once<br />

# that spent the night<br />

# of people would like to sleep overnight<br />

Room Inventory (for visitors)<br />

Work Desk<br />

Bed<br />

Seating (ie chairs and couches)<br />

Table<br />

Closet<br />

TV<br />

Sink<br />

Visitor Activities<br />

Sleep<br />

Eat<br />

Talk to Staff<br />

Monitor Patient<br />

Monitor Care given to the patient<br />

Work<br />

Read<br />

Watch TV<br />

Socialize<br />

Pass Time by:<br />

Items Brought<br />

Bag (ie purse, suitcase)<br />

Clothes<br />

Toiletries<br />

Hairdryer/Flat Iron<br />

Laptop<br />

DVDs<br />

Reading Material (magazines, books, newspaper)<br />

<strong>Bo</strong>ard Games or puzzles<br />

Food<br />

Drinks<br />

Pillows<br />

Linens<br />

Other<br />

Are you satisfied with current family zone? (Yes or No)<br />

What else do you need?<br />

Figure 9: Survey Template<br />

20


Transportation Cabin Design – Literature Review<br />

Putting the passenger first<br />

Robinson, Tim Source: Aerospace International, v 33, n 3, March, 2006, p 26-29<br />

ISSN: 1467-5072<br />

Publisher: Royal Aeronautical Society<br />

Abstract: The key to running a successful airline relies in attracting passengers and in retaining them. The highly<br />

dynamic global market of airlines is occupying the marketing departments of major airlines and the interior design<br />

concept studios. Passengers have become more choosy and expect more out of an airline, and are eager to compare<br />

notes through online blogs, forums and traveler's rating websites. Any aircraft entering service can be expected to<br />

have several configurations of its cabin interior and the challenge is to make these upgrades cost-effective.<br />

Ei controlled terms: Air transportation - Marketing - Online systems - Websites - Cost effectiveness<br />

Classification Code: 431.1 Air Transportation, General - 911.4 Marketing - 722.4 Digital<br />

Computers & <strong>Systems</strong> - 911.2 Industrial Economics<br />

Database: Compendex<br />

Enhancing air travel experience<br />

Howells, David Source: Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, v 76, n 1, 2004, p 57-59<br />

ISSN: 0002-2667 CODEN: AATEEB<br />

Publisher: Emerald<br />

Abstract: The research and development work taking place in QinetiQ to solve various problems of aerospace,<br />

health, transport, telecommunications, human sciences and power generation industries were discussed. The new<br />

concept in aircraft cabin design with the potential to offer a more complete cabin experience to passengers was also<br />

discussed. The development of cabin air control and filteration system to eradicate the inevitable aircraft ordours was<br />

also presented. The future challenges for airlines which is to maintain a balance between the maximizing service<br />

levels while meeting customer expectations and offering lower fares were also addressed. (1 refs.)<br />

Ei controlled terms: Aerospace industry - Research and development management - Aerospace<br />

engineering - Liquid crystal displays - Control systems - Customer satisfaction - Standards - Air quality<br />

Classification Code: 652 Aircraft - 901.3 Engineering Research - 912.2 Management - 658<br />

Aerospace Engineering, General - 722.2 Computer Peripheral Equipment - 731.1 Control<br />

<strong>Systems</strong> - 902.2 Codes & Standards - 451.2 Air Pollution Control<br />

Database: Compendex<br />

Interiors of cabin airplanes<br />

Anon Source: Aero Digest, v 14, n 3, Mar, 1929, p 72-74<br />

Abstract: Wide range of possibilities for cabin interiors; cabins of Travel Air 6000, Bach Air Transport, Keystone<br />

Patrician, Ford Trimotor, Lockheed Vega, <strong>Bo</strong>eing <strong>Bo</strong>at B-1E, Burnelli Airliner and American Eagle monoplane<br />

described. Apr.: Comfort in flying as shown in equipment of modern airplane cabin is discussed; details of cabins of<br />

Fairchild planes, Hamilton Metalplane, Travel Air 4-place monoplane, and Loening amphibian ambulance plane.<br />

21


Ei controlled terms: Airplane cabins - Design<br />

Database: Compendex<br />

Getting bigger<br />

Mecham, Michael Source: Aviation Week and Space Technology (New York), v 162, n 14, Apr 4,<br />

2005, p 42-43<br />

ISSN: 0005-2175 CODEN: AWSTAV<br />

Publisher: McGraw-Hill Companies<br />

Abstract: The expension by Dubai-based Emirates Airlines by offering in the 777 family the 8,300-naut.-mi. stretch<br />

version of the 787, is discussed. <strong>Bo</strong>eing anticipates that the new version will enter the market between 2010-12,<br />

called the 787-9, nad is planned to seat 259 passengers in a tri-class configuration. The Emirates Chairman, HH<br />

Sheikh Ahmed bin Saeed Al Moktoum, wants to push the seating closer to 300 in a dual-class for more capacity. The<br />

standard model 787-8 is due to enter the market in the year 2008.<br />

Ei controlled terms: Air transportation - Aircraft - Customer satisfaction - Airframes - Cabins (aircraft) -<br />

Carbon fibers - Fuselages - Light emitting diodes - Flight dynamics<br />

Classification Code: 431.1 Air Transportation, General - 652.1 Aircraft, General - 912<br />

Industrial Engineering and Management - 652.3 Aircraft Instruments & Equipment - 804<br />

Chemical Products Generally - 714.2 Semiconductor Devices & Integrated Circuits<br />

Database: Compendex<br />

Multimedia cabin<br />

Gormley, Mal Source: Business & Commercial Aviation, v 76, n 3, Mar, 1995, p 48-51<br />

ISSN: 0191-4642 CODEN: BCAVEQ<br />

Publisher: McGraw-Hill Inc<br />

Abstract: Cabin amenities are now being upgraded and designed in such a way that passengers can keep<br />

themselves, informed and productive during the course of the flight. Cabins are configured into a true multimedia<br />

environment where one can enjoy listening to music, watching the latest motion picture, working or playing on a<br />

computer or tracking the flights' progress. All these activities are made possible by the integration of cabin<br />

entertainment functions with passenger information systems and computers. Integrated plug and play systems help<br />

facilitate the installation of these multimedia suites.<br />

Ei controlled terms: Cabins (aircraft) - Airport passenger transportation - Automation - Information<br />

technology - Personal computers - Liquid crystal displays - Human computer interaction - Computer hardware -<br />

CD-ROM - Computer workstations - Computer networks<br />

Classification Code: 652.1.1 Commerical Aircraft - 431.2 Passenger Air Transportation - 903<br />

Information Science - 722.4 Digital Computers & <strong>Systems</strong> - 722.2 Computer Peripheral<br />

Equipment - 723.5 Computer Applications<br />

Database: Compendex<br />

22


Aircraft interior integration<br />

Elliot, Robert E. (<strong>Bo</strong>eing Commercial Airlplane Group) Source: Aerospace Engineering (Warrendale,<br />

Pennsylvania), v 15, n 5, May, 1995, p 31-35<br />

ISSN: 0736-2536 CODEN: AEENEP<br />

Publisher: SAE<br />

Abstract: Careful consideration of materials, processes, and designs for aircraft interiors is critical to designing and<br />

producing airplanes successfully, and for supporting airline customers. The three-pronged approach is especially<br />

applicable for interior components such as sidewalls, ceiling panels, stowage bins, lights, emergency equipment, and<br />

entertainment/communication systems. Each component of this approach must be evaluated as to its effect on the<br />

airline operating environment which includes items such as galley servicing, cabin cleaning, passenger ingress and<br />

egress, cargo and baggage handling, and passenger seating.<br />

Ei controlled terms: Aircraft parts and equipment - Air transportation - Structural panels - Bins -<br />

Thermoplastics - Thermosets - Sandwich structures - Heat transfer - Smoke - Flammability - Accident<br />

prevention - Manufacture - Materials handling<br />

Classification Code: 652.3 Aircraft Instruments & Equipment - 431.1 Air Transportation,<br />

General - 408.2 Structural Members & Shapes - 815.1.1 Organic Polymers - 641.2 Heat<br />

Transfer - 914.1 Accidents & Accident Prevention<br />

Database: Compendex<br />

Cabin focus shifts to convenience, costs<br />

Proctor, Paul Source: Aviation Week and Space Technology (New York), v 141, n 7, Aug 15, 1994,<br />

p 42-43<br />

ISSN: 0005-2175 CODEN: AWSTAV<br />

Publisher: McGraw-Hill Inc<br />

Abstract: Airframers are improving commercial transport cabin interiors to augment passenger comfort, safety and<br />

convenience while lowering weight and maintenance costs. Heavy transport interior designers are concentrating on<br />

flexibility and maintainability. McDonnell Douglas' new MD-90 interior will feature a lot of minor changes that will add<br />

up to overall convenience for the passenger. Design considerations range from an uncluttered, skylighted ceiling to<br />

the flight attendant call buttons.<br />

Ei controlled terms: Cabins (aircraft) - Maintainability - Lighting - Ceilings - Design - Aircraft fabrics -<br />

Noise abatement - Modification<br />

Classification Code: 652.1 Aircraft, General - 913.5 Maintenance - 707.1 Electric Lighting -<br />

819.5 Textile Products & Processing - 751.4 Acoustic Noise<br />

Database: Compendex<br />

23


Human Dimensions<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!