Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch
Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch
Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
X. Haste, Incompetence, Prejudice: The Arrest of <strong>Witness</strong>es Who<br />
Have No Information<br />
The number of men arrested and incarcerated as material witnesses who had no<br />
connection <strong>to</strong>, much less knowledge about, terrorists or terrorist activities is significant.<br />
Based on government admissions of mistaken arrests, Congressional inquiries, and our<br />
review of material witness cases, as many as one-third of the witnesses had no relevant<br />
information regarding any criminal activity. 258 In these cases, the information suggesting<br />
that the witness had any information relating <strong>to</strong> an investigation was erroneous. The<br />
number may be substantially greater, but cannot be ascertained until more records are<br />
made public. Forty-two witnesses never faced any charges, and only seven faced any<br />
terrorism-related charges.<br />
In a significant proportion of cases, witnesses have had information, but it was far <strong>to</strong>o<br />
minimal, tangential, or circumstantial <strong>to</strong> provide the basis for arrest and incarceration.<br />
There may have been good reasons for the Justice Department <strong>to</strong> want <strong>to</strong> talk <strong>to</strong> some<br />
of these men, such as those who had prior contacts with hijackers, but absent any<br />
evidence of wrongdoing, there was no good reason for arresting them and forcing them<br />
<strong>to</strong> languish in jail. If the government had been willing <strong>to</strong> proceed more carefully, if it had<br />
taken more seriously the liberty interests of the men, few of the seventy would have<br />
been considered genuine material witnesses, and even fewer would have been deemed<br />
flight risks. What has accounted for the appalling record of arresting utterly innocent<br />
people and locking them up for months?<br />
The federal government understandably felt great urgency after the September 11<br />
attacks, particularly in light of the limited information the FBI had about al-Qaeda at the<br />
time, and this apparently induced federal investiga<strong>to</strong>rs and at<strong>to</strong>rneys <strong>to</strong> lower their<br />
professional standards. Yet months and years after September 11, when federal agents<br />
have assessed how <strong>to</strong> proceed with Muslim men of Middle Eastern and South Asian<br />
descent who had attracted their notice for one reason or another, they have rushed <strong>to</strong><br />
judgment, and failed <strong>to</strong> acquire and develop solid evidence. In case after case, federal<br />
investiga<strong>to</strong>rs and at<strong>to</strong>rneys have given undue weight <strong>to</strong> unverified tips, made poor<br />
inferences from the information they had, and leapt <strong>to</strong> dubious conclusions.<br />
258<br />
In addition <strong>to</strong> the public apologies for wrongful arrests and admissions in Congress, Justice Department<br />
officials have acknowledged that some material witnesses held in the September 11 investigations may have no<br />
relevant information. See also Center for National Security Studies v. Department of Justice, Reynolds Aff. 36,<br />
No. 01-2500 (D.D.C. 2002), Chief of the Terrorism and Violent Crime Section in the Criminal Division of the U.S.<br />
Department of Justice, James Reynolds (noting that “it may turn out that [material witnesses held in connection<br />
<strong>to</strong> September 11] have no information useful <strong>to</strong> the investigation or that they are innocent people who are able<br />
<strong>to</strong> assist the government in its investigations”).<br />
81 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G)