13.01.2014 Views

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

armed forces for several years and had no criminal record. He had not left the country in<br />

almost ten years and possessed only an expired passport.<br />

In Mayfield’s case, the lack of evidence that he had traveled outside the United States<br />

became the basis for the government’s argument that he was a flight risk. Having<br />

asserted that it had positively matched Mayfield <strong>to</strong> a fingerprint found in Spain, the<br />

government contended that the absence of a valid passport or record of travel had <strong>to</strong><br />

mean that Mayfield possessed false documents (though none had been found in searches<br />

of his home, office, and safe deposit box). As <strong>to</strong> why Mayfield would flee, the<br />

government baldly pointed <strong>to</strong> his status as a suspected terrorist:<br />

Since no record of travel or travel documents have been found in the<br />

name of BRANDON BIERI MAYFIELD, it is believed that<br />

MAYFIELD may have traveled under a false or fictitious name, with<br />

false or fictitious documents … I believe that based upon the likelihood<br />

of false travel documents in existence, and the serious nature of the potential<br />

charges, MAYFIELD may attempt <strong>to</strong> flee the country if served with a<br />

subpoena <strong>to</strong> appear before the federal grand jury. Affiant believes that if<br />

a material witness arrest warrant is not issued at this time, MAYFIELD’s<br />

testimony will probably be lost <strong>to</strong> the Grand Jury and will probably not<br />

be available in any subsequent criminal proceeding in the United<br />

States. 247<br />

The court accepted the government’s allegations. According <strong>to</strong> the transcripts, Mayfield,<br />

and his at<strong>to</strong>rneys, the presiding judge also appeared <strong>to</strong> rely on the magnitude of the<br />

alleged crime <strong>to</strong> determine that Mayfield was a flight risk. When Brandon Mayfield<br />

challenged his detention in his first court appearance and assured the judge that he<br />

would testify, the judge refused his requests for release stating, “We are looking at [a]<br />

very serious situation. I will have <strong>to</strong> hold you.” 248 At the conclusion of the hearing, the<br />

court elaborated:<br />

My finding is, because of the gravity of the matter, there is no way that I<br />

can ensure the appearance, in spite of good words, and the situation of<br />

this material witness at this time, if that is his fingerprint with the 200-<br />

plus dead people and 1,500 injured and potential call on the witness <strong>to</strong><br />

247<br />

Richard Werder Affidavit for material witness arrest warrant (emphasis added).<br />

248<br />

Transcript of Proceedings Before the Honorable Robert E. Jones, In re Mayfield, Misc. No. 04-9071, p. 16 (D.<br />

Or. Filed May 6, 2004).<br />

77 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!