13.01.2014 Views

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I was not allowed <strong>to</strong> take a copy of the affidavit. I could only see it<br />

in court and I had <strong>to</strong> write it out. Everything was secret-the warrant<br />

was filed under seal. The courtroom was closed. It didn’t matter<br />

whether they had agreed <strong>to</strong> cooperate. 177<br />

• Susan Ot<strong>to</strong>, representing material witness Mujahid Menepta in Oklahoma, only<br />

was able <strong>to</strong> view the affidavit briefly in court in the presence of the government<br />

and the judge. “I only was able <strong>to</strong> see the warrant and affidavit in open court. A<br />

number of FBI and cops were sitting at the table with the government.”<br />

Menepta was permitted <strong>to</strong> view the affidavit with Ot<strong>to</strong> while she was in court<br />

but was not given his own copy. 178<br />

Denial of Right <strong>to</strong> Counsel<br />

Everyone has the right <strong>to</strong> an at<strong>to</strong>rney when subjected <strong>to</strong> “cus<strong>to</strong>dial” interrogation, i.e.,<br />

when he or she is not free <strong>to</strong> leave, or when government agents seek <strong>to</strong> question him<br />

about suspected criminal conduct. 179 Material witnesses are guaranteed the right <strong>to</strong><br />

counsel at their court appearance by statute and by the Fifth Amendment right <strong>to</strong> due<br />

process. 180 If a material witness appears in court without counsel, the presiding judicial<br />

officer is required <strong>to</strong> inform the witness that he or she has the right <strong>to</strong> counsel. If a<br />

witness cannot afford an at<strong>to</strong>rney, he or she has the right <strong>to</strong> court-appointed counsel.<br />

In the material witness context: “Counsel is required so that the material witness may<br />

know precisely what is happening, so that he is aware of the prospect of incarceration,<br />

and so that he is treated fairly by the prosecution.” 181 Despite these clear requirements,<br />

federal authorities have sometimes failed <strong>to</strong> inform material witnesses they were<br />

interrogating about their right <strong>to</strong> counsel. Moreover, even when witnesses have<br />

requested counsel, government agents have sometimes delayed for days in providing<br />

counsel, or they have discouraged witnesses from obtaining counsel, suggesting that the<br />

presence of counsel would simply delay the witnesses’ release.<br />

177<br />

HRW/ACLU telephone interview with J. Fredrick Sinclair, at<strong>to</strong>rney for Mohammad al-Qudhaieen, Alexandria,<br />

Virginia, August 17, 2004.<br />

178<br />

Interview with Susan Ot<strong>to</strong>.<br />

179<br />

See, e.g., U.N. Body of Principles, principle 17(1): “A detained person shall be entitled <strong>to</strong> have the assistance<br />

of a legal counsel. He shall be informed of his right by the competent authority promptly after arrest and shall be<br />

provided with reasonable facilities for exercising it.”<br />

180<br />

18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(1)(g); In re Class Action Application for Habeas Corpus ex rel. ll Material <strong>Witness</strong>es,<br />

612 F.Supp. 940, 943-44 (W.D. Tex. 1985).<br />

181<br />

Ibid.<br />

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G) 56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!