13.01.2014 Views

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

sentencing. The judge finally got angry with the prosecution and<br />

rebuked the government for alleging that Biheiri had terrorism<br />

connections without any basis. 111<br />

In January 2004, Biheiri was convicted of the criminal document fraud charges after a<br />

jury trial and given a one-year sentence, the manda<strong>to</strong>ry minimum, with credit for time<br />

served. Days before Biheiri was scheduled <strong>to</strong> be released in June 2004, the Department<br />

of Justice brought new criminal charges against him. Using the same facts from his first<br />

conviction, the government charged Biheiri with one count of using his U.S. passport<br />

unlawfully because it was procured by a false statement. 112 The government also charged<br />

Biheiri with two counts of making false official statements <strong>to</strong> government agents based<br />

on statements Biheiri made when he was first questioned by the FBI without an<br />

at<strong>to</strong>rney. In Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 2004, a jury convicted Biheiri of one count of fraud.<br />

Mohamad Kamal Elzahabi<br />

The Department of Justice arrested Mohamad Kamal Elzahabi as a material witness in<br />

Minneapolis, Minnesota, in May 2004. He was incarcerated in Minneapolis for about<br />

three weeks 113 and then transferred <strong>to</strong> the Special Housing Unit of the Metropolitan<br />

Correctional Center in Manhattan, where he was held in solitary confinement for two<br />

weeks. During these five weeks of incarceration, Elzahabi was never brought before a<br />

grand jury.<br />

When the presiding judge indicated that he would release Elzahabi if the government did<br />

not call him <strong>to</strong> testify in front of a grand jury, the government filed two charges against<br />

him for making false statements <strong>to</strong> the FBI. As his at<strong>to</strong>rney described the situation:<br />

We had a time deadline—the government had <strong>to</strong> do something in order<br />

<strong>to</strong> justify keeping him in detention as a witness; he hadn’t testified at all.<br />

Judge Castel <strong>to</strong>ld the government, “Look you’ve got <strong>to</strong> produce him <strong>to</strong><br />

the grand jury; what are you doing?” The government basically hemmed<br />

and hawed. It was clear <strong>to</strong> me if the government didn’t do something<br />

Mohamad may be released; Judge Castel would lose his patience. The<br />

government unders<strong>to</strong>od this, and the day before we were supposed <strong>to</strong><br />

111<br />

Interview with James Clark.<br />

112<br />

May 2004 Indictment of Soliman S. Biheiri, United States v. Biheiri, Crim. No. 04-201 (E.D.V.A. Filed May 6,<br />

2001) (charging him with two counts of false official statements and fraudulent procurement of passport).<br />

113<br />

HRW/ACLU telephone interview with Dan Scott, federal public defender for the District of Minnesota,<br />

Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 11, 2004 (Interview with Dan Scott).<br />

35 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!