13.01.2014 Views

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Soliman Biheiri<br />

In June 2003, the FBI arrested as a material witness Soliman Biheiri, then a U.S. citizen<br />

with three U.S. citizen children. The Justice Department suspected Biheiri of doing<br />

financial work for Abu Marzook, a well-known leader of Hamas. It informed the court<br />

that it intended <strong>to</strong> bring Biheiri in front of a grand jury investigating terrorist financing<br />

networks in Chicago. For two months, the government never called Biheiri <strong>to</strong> testify in<br />

front of a grand jury but continued <strong>to</strong> argue in court that his detention was necessary<br />

because of his alleged connections <strong>to</strong> terrorist suspects. 109<br />

Just as the court was going <strong>to</strong> order Biheiri released, after he had been held without<br />

charges in high-security jails for more than two months, the government charged him<br />

with an obscure non-terrorist related crime: unlawful procurement of naturalization<br />

based on a false statement he had made in 1990 immigration applications. 110 In 1990,<br />

Biheiri had listed himself as the vice president of his company on immigration<br />

documents, when in fact he was the president. The government used this misstatement<br />

<strong>to</strong> allege that Biheiri committed fraud on his 2000 naturalization application, when he<br />

answered “no” <strong>to</strong> the question of whether he had ever committed a crime for which he<br />

had not been convicted. According <strong>to</strong> his at<strong>to</strong>rney:<br />

It’s not a coincidence that they held him and never put him in front of a<br />

grand jury and then dismissed him as a material witness when they had<br />

built up charges against him. … My sense is that they had nothing on<br />

him <strong>to</strong> hold him as a material witness. They were just trying <strong>to</strong> buy time<br />

<strong>to</strong> find something. The irony is that he was completely innocent of any<br />

terrorist allegation. The government was never able <strong>to</strong> find a credible<br />

ground <strong>to</strong> bring terrorism charges—they never produced enough proof<br />

<strong>to</strong> even charge him. Instead, they charged him on a completely unrelated<br />

immigration charge, which they based on a visa application they dug up<br />

from 12 years ago. And even then, when the government couldn’t<br />

obtain an indictment on Biheiri for terrorism charges, the government<br />

sought a ten-year enhancement for terrorism associations during<br />

109<br />

HRW/ACLU telephone interview with James Clark, lead criminal defense at<strong>to</strong>rney for Soliman Biheiri,<br />

Alexandria, Virginia, April 8, 2004 (Interview with James Clark).<br />

110<br />

HRW/ACLU telephone interview with Nina Ginsberg, criminal defense at<strong>to</strong>rney for Soliman Biheiri,<br />

Washing<strong>to</strong>n, D.C., April 8, 2004. According <strong>to</strong> Ginsberg:<br />

During his material witness detention, the government did not put him on the witness stand<br />

or charge Soliman until the judge finally after two months <strong>to</strong>ld the government that he was<br />

going <strong>to</strong> release him unless the government charged him. The government then criminally<br />

charged him with immigration fraud—lying on his naturalization application.<br />

Ibid.<br />

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G) 34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!