13.01.2014 Views

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Justice Department has often stalled when courts pressed it <strong>to</strong> secure the witnesses’<br />

testimony—it has sought continuances and looked for ways <strong>to</strong> delay the testimony.<br />

Meanwhile, it has continued <strong>to</strong> interrogate the witnesses and gather information about<br />

them from other sources, as if they were suspects. While the Justice Department has<br />

stalled for time, the witnesses have endured incarceration, as illustrated by the following<br />

examples.<br />

Abdullah Tuwalah<br />

In 2001, Saudi national Abdullah Tuwalah was a scholarship student at Marymount<br />

University in Arling<strong>to</strong>n, Virginia. The Department of Justice arrested Tuwalah on the<br />

allegation that he had information material <strong>to</strong> the grand jury investigation of Saleh Ali<br />

Almari, another student who had been briefly enrolled at Marymount. The FBI<br />

connected Tuwalah <strong>to</strong> Almari because Tuwalah had met Almari through the Arab social<br />

club on campus. 81 Although counsel for Tuwalah repeatedly informed the federal<br />

at<strong>to</strong>rneys handling the case that he was ready <strong>to</strong> testify, the government refused <strong>to</strong><br />

present him <strong>to</strong> the grand jury. Instead, according <strong>to</strong> his at<strong>to</strong>rney, “the government just<br />

kept interviewing him.” 82 During the six weeks Tuwalah was incarcerated as a material<br />

witness, the FBI interviewed him multiple times; Tuwalah even agreed <strong>to</strong> a polygraph.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> his lawyer:<br />

The FBI interrogated him seven times and it was clear from the<br />

beginning that he was cooperative. He said that he would come in<br />

voluntarily and would cooperate during interviews. I’ve never seen<br />

interview questions like this. The questions would go like this: the FBI<br />

would not even ask questions they would just say “well he knows<br />

something” and we’d respond “he knows what?” and then the FBI<br />

would come back and say “he knows.” The interviews were ridiculous.<br />

Tuwalah never testified. The grand jury was convened but they never put him on the<br />

stand. His lawyer said, “They wanted <strong>to</strong> investigate him <strong>to</strong> see if he had anything or <strong>to</strong><br />

say he had something. They were trying <strong>to</strong> put <strong>to</strong>gether a mosaic of information—trying<br />

<strong>to</strong> piece him <strong>to</strong>gether with anybody who knew anything.” 83<br />

81<br />

HRW/ACLU telephone interview with Denise Sabagh, at<strong>to</strong>rney for material witness Abdullah Tuwalah,<br />

Washing<strong>to</strong>n, D.C., August 18, 2004 (Interview with Denise Sabagh).<br />

82<br />

Ibid. The FBI also arrested several other Muslim Marymount students and detained them as material<br />

witnesses because they had known Almari.<br />

83<br />

Interview with Denise Sabagh.<br />

27 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!