Acknowledgements This report was researched and written by Anjana Malhotra, Aryeh Neier fellow for <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> and the American Civil Liberties Union. The primary edi<strong>to</strong>r of the report and project manager was Jamie Fellner, U.S. Program direc<strong>to</strong>r for <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>. Lee Gelernt, senior at<strong>to</strong>rney for the American Civil Liberties Union Immigrants’ <strong>Rights</strong> Project, Jim Ross, general counsel for <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, Joseph Saunders, deputy program direc<strong>to</strong>r for <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, and Robin Goldfaden, staff at<strong>to</strong>rney for the American Civil Liberties Union Immigrants’ <strong>Rights</strong> Project also reviewed and edited this report. Ann Beeson, associate litigation direc<strong>to</strong>r for the American Civil Liberties Union, provided valuable assistance in coordinating the report. Keramet Reiter, associate for the U.S. program provided research assistance and prepared the report for publication. <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> staff Andrea Holley, publications direc<strong>to</strong>r and Fitzroy Hepkins, mail manager, provided production assistance. Paul Jacobs and Miranda Johnson provided research assistance throughout the report. Manu Krishnan assisted in proofreading the report. <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> and the American Civil Liberties Union would like <strong>to</strong> thank the many individuals in the United States and abroad who made invaluable contributions <strong>to</strong> our understanding of the Department of Justice’s use of the material witness law as a post-September 11 policy. We are particularly grateful <strong>to</strong> the material witnesses, their families, and their counsel who gave the testimony that forms the core of this report. Because of the Department of Justice’s efforts <strong>to</strong> keep all of the post-September 11 material witness arrests secret, finding the witnesses was a difficult endeavor, made possible only with the help of many people, including: Adem Carroll, the Islamic Circle of North America, Sin Yen Lee, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and the many activists working with the New York Post-September 11 Civil <strong>Rights</strong> Coalition, Islamic Circle of North America, Counsel on American Islamic Relations, Muslim Public Affairs Council, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and the Migration Policy Institute, as well as the ACLU Affiliates of Eastern Missouri, Nevada, and Oregon. We also wish <strong>to</strong> acknowledge the guidance provided throughout this report by Stephen Schulhofer, professor, New York University School of Law, Michael Wishnie, professor of clinical law, New York University School of Law, Wendy Patten, former advocacy direc<strong>to</strong>r of <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, Benita Jain, Immigrant Defense Project, Nancy Morawetz, professor of clinical law, New York University School of Law, and Anil Kalhan, associate-in-law at Columbia University. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G) 100
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> and the American Civil Liberties Union are grateful <strong>to</strong> the Open Society Institute for its support of the Aryeh Neier Fellowship. We would also like <strong>to</strong> give special thanks <strong>to</strong> Gara LaMarche, vice president of the OSI for initiating the fellowship. <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> would also like <strong>to</strong> thank the Open Society Institute and Peter Lewis for their support of our work on U.S. post-September 11 policies. 101 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G)
- Page 1 and 2:
Human Rights Watch June 2005 Vol. 1
- Page 3 and 4:
Summary After I got in the cell I w
- Page 5 and 6:
were almost all the witnesses Musli
- Page 7 and 8:
combination with having worked in t
- Page 9 and 10:
Recommendations The recommendations
- Page 11 and 12:
o requiring the government to infor
- Page 13 and 14:
eflects a compromise between an ind
- Page 15 and 16:
the witness for immigration or prob
- Page 17 and 18:
those suspected of committing a cri
- Page 19 and 20:
Arizona, and Florida, where the nin
- Page 21 and 22:
testimony—you get fingerprints, y
- Page 23 and 24:
The FBI appeared to believe that Ma
- Page 25 and 26:
interrogating him, without counsel,
- Page 27 and 28:
Jose Padilla On May 8, 2002, the Ju
- Page 29 and 30:
The Justice Department has often st
- Page 31 and 32:
criticism on the conduct of Assista
- Page 33 and 34:
government failed to take Diab’s
- Page 35 and 36:
Eric Sears, a former federal prosec
- Page 37 and 38:
sentencing. The judge finally got a
- Page 39 and 40:
accompanied by extensive searches c
- Page 41 and 42:
and young children. 121 He was deta
- Page 43 and 44:
High Security Conditions of Detenti
- Page 45 and 46:
Harassment and Abuse in Jail Many m
- Page 47 and 48:
uised. See id. In the elevator, the
- Page 49 and 50:
In practice, then, court approval o
- Page 51 and 52: I kept asking what am I being charg
- Page 53 and 54: As Mark Foster, the lawyer for one
- Page 55 and 56: Federal marshals transferred the ei
- Page 57 and 58: [T]he government filed all their pa
- Page 59 and 60: Federal agents have also refused to
- Page 61 and 62: In many cases, the trauma of forcef
- Page 63 and 64: In January 2002, another hotel gues
- Page 65 and 66: abuse, international human rights 2
- Page 67 and 68: It is not clear why the courts have
- Page 69 and 70: Things go on behind those doors tha
- Page 71 and 72: providing interviews, submitting to
- Page 73 and 74: Detaining Witnesses Who Cooperate w
- Page 75 and 76: stayed with the FBI agents for eigh
- Page 77 and 78: government, “I’m not coming.”
- Page 79 and 80: armed forces for several years and
- Page 81 and 82: Congress included the deposition re
- Page 83 and 84: X. Haste, Incompetence, Prejudice:
- Page 85 and 86: government’s basis was weak. Thes
- Page 87 and 88: target, 272 the state police ordere
- Page 89 and 90: Khan and Azmath were deported in Ja
- Page 91 and 92: told them I told them I had no idea
- Page 93 and 94: y subletting their apartment. Altho
- Page 95 and 96: The post-scripts to the stories of
- Page 97 and 98: I could not ask questions. What’s
- Page 99 and 100: Ayub Ali Khan and Mohammad Azmath A
- Page 101: get all these kinds of questions—