13.01.2014 Views

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

her marriage <strong>to</strong> Azmath. 322 Citing national security concerns, the Andhra government<br />

initiated deportation proceedings against Murad, who was pregnant with Azmath’s<br />

child. 323 Khan’s family faced harassment in predominantly-Hindu Hyderabad. 324<br />

Because of the two men’s incarceration, their families in India lost a primary source of<br />

family income. In India, Khan and his family “suffered a lot during the government’s<br />

investigation of me. My mother went in<strong>to</strong> shock.” 325 Nonetheless, Khan’s mother,<br />

through her daughter, began a campaign <strong>to</strong> release her son, or at <strong>to</strong> least find out why he<br />

was being held, writing government officials and the United Nations.<br />

When Khan and Azmath returned <strong>to</strong> India, Indian authorities detained and questioned<br />

both of them. The Hyderabad authorities criminally charged Khan and Azmath with<br />

passport fraud and, as of June 2005, were still routinely interviewing them and inspecting<br />

their homes. 326 The two men have faced anti-Muslim discrimination in India and believe<br />

the fall-out from the material witness arrests includes their inability <strong>to</strong> move forward on<br />

their plans <strong>to</strong> open a small business.<br />

“Evansville Eight”<br />

The “Evansville Eight” material witnesses suffered serious financial consequences from<br />

their detentions as material witnesses. Although the FBI apologized <strong>to</strong> the eight<br />

wrongfully detained men and the Muslim community in Evansville, the apology did not<br />

mitigate the community’s suspicions and the impact on the restaurant owned by Tarek<br />

Albasti, where several of the other material witnesses worked. As Albasti describes:<br />

[A]fter we were released we were in hell, you tell yourself, okay, well they<br />

released us so everyone should understand we are innocent, but that was<br />

not the case. Because I mean there are some people who support you<br />

and stuff like this but everyone is curious: did you snitch on somebody<br />

else, or did you make a deal with the government, or why were you<br />

released, or did you really do something or not. And just you know you<br />

322<br />

Interview with Mohammad Azmath.<br />

323<br />

After a legal battle (and the FBI’s clearance of Azmath as a suspect in the September 11 investigation), the<br />

Indian Central Government overturned the deportation order and issued Murad a one-year extension of her<br />

visa. Omer Farooq, “Pakistani Woman Escapes Deportation,” BBC News, Sept. 23, 2002.<br />

324<br />

Interview with Ayub Ali Khan.<br />

325<br />

Interview with Ayub Ali Khan; Farooq, “One-Time Terror Suspect Claims …”<br />

326<br />

Syed Amin Jafri, “Cases in AP against Indians in Cus<strong>to</strong>dy,” India Abroad, Sept. 21, 2001.<br />

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G) 98

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!