Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch
Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch
Witness to Abuse - Human Rights Watch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
her marriage <strong>to</strong> Azmath. 322 Citing national security concerns, the Andhra government<br />
initiated deportation proceedings against Murad, who was pregnant with Azmath’s<br />
child. 323 Khan’s family faced harassment in predominantly-Hindu Hyderabad. 324<br />
Because of the two men’s incarceration, their families in India lost a primary source of<br />
family income. In India, Khan and his family “suffered a lot during the government’s<br />
investigation of me. My mother went in<strong>to</strong> shock.” 325 Nonetheless, Khan’s mother,<br />
through her daughter, began a campaign <strong>to</strong> release her son, or at <strong>to</strong> least find out why he<br />
was being held, writing government officials and the United Nations.<br />
When Khan and Azmath returned <strong>to</strong> India, Indian authorities detained and questioned<br />
both of them. The Hyderabad authorities criminally charged Khan and Azmath with<br />
passport fraud and, as of June 2005, were still routinely interviewing them and inspecting<br />
their homes. 326 The two men have faced anti-Muslim discrimination in India and believe<br />
the fall-out from the material witness arrests includes their inability <strong>to</strong> move forward on<br />
their plans <strong>to</strong> open a small business.<br />
“Evansville Eight”<br />
The “Evansville Eight” material witnesses suffered serious financial consequences from<br />
their detentions as material witnesses. Although the FBI apologized <strong>to</strong> the eight<br />
wrongfully detained men and the Muslim community in Evansville, the apology did not<br />
mitigate the community’s suspicions and the impact on the restaurant owned by Tarek<br />
Albasti, where several of the other material witnesses worked. As Albasti describes:<br />
[A]fter we were released we were in hell, you tell yourself, okay, well they<br />
released us so everyone should understand we are innocent, but that was<br />
not the case. Because I mean there are some people who support you<br />
and stuff like this but everyone is curious: did you snitch on somebody<br />
else, or did you make a deal with the government, or why were you<br />
released, or did you really do something or not. And just you know you<br />
322<br />
Interview with Mohammad Azmath.<br />
323<br />
After a legal battle (and the FBI’s clearance of Azmath as a suspect in the September 11 investigation), the<br />
Indian Central Government overturned the deportation order and issued Murad a one-year extension of her<br />
visa. Omer Farooq, “Pakistani Woman Escapes Deportation,” BBC News, Sept. 23, 2002.<br />
324<br />
Interview with Ayub Ali Khan.<br />
325<br />
Interview with Ayub Ali Khan; Farooq, “One-Time Terror Suspect Claims …”<br />
326<br />
Syed Amin Jafri, “Cases in AP against Indians in Cus<strong>to</strong>dy,” India Abroad, Sept. 21, 2001.<br />
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH VOL. 17, NO. 2(G) 98