13.01.2014 Views

Ethiopia lessons in repression: violations of academic problems, HRW

Ethiopia lessons in repression: violations of academic problems, HRW

Ethiopia lessons in repression: violations of academic problems, HRW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The student union first published its newspaper Hil<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>in</strong> Amharic. Shortly thereafter, the<br />

university adm<strong>in</strong>istration blocked the funds the union had raised by sell<strong>in</strong>g advertis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the paper and refused to<br />

allow the students to pr<strong>in</strong>t any further issues. Hil<strong>in</strong>a rema<strong>in</strong>s effectively outlawed though, <strong>in</strong> a press <strong>in</strong>terview,<br />

AAU Academic Vice President Dr. Tetemke Mahri denied that the newspaper had been banned. He said that the<br />

university did not take issue with the factual content <strong>of</strong> the 2000 newspaper. Rather, he expla<strong>in</strong>ed, the<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration felt that the editors’ decision to publish <strong>in</strong> the Amharic language as opposed to English was<br />

<strong>in</strong>appropriate “because <strong>of</strong> the ethnic and language difference that exists with<strong>in</strong> the University.” He admitted that<br />

the university had withheld the paper’s money from the student editors, he said because the students failed to<br />

follow proper procedures to withdraw the funds from the university’s bank account. He did not expla<strong>in</strong> why the<br />

funds had still not been dispersed two years later. 224 Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the university rules regard<strong>in</strong>g student<br />

publications as published <strong>in</strong> 1982, students have “the same rights as other <strong>Ethiopia</strong>ns” to freedom <strong>of</strong> expression as<br />

well as a “responsibility” not to <strong>in</strong>fr<strong>in</strong>ge on national law or the university code <strong>of</strong> conduct. 225<br />

VII. INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE<br />

The <strong>in</strong>ternational community has done little to hold the EPRDF government accountable for widespread<br />

human rights <strong>violations</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce it came to power more than ten years ago. The EPRDF cont<strong>in</strong>ues to receive<br />

substantial foreign assistance from the U.S., Europe, and multilateral agencies. Some <strong>of</strong> this, like recent<br />

announcements by the U.S., E.U., and U.N. to donate substantial amounts <strong>of</strong> humanitarian assistance <strong>in</strong> response<br />

to a worsen<strong>in</strong>g food crisis <strong>in</strong> many parts <strong>of</strong> the country, is commendable. They have also supported various<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> democratization, educational development, and poverty alleviation. However, at times, donors have<br />

supported the security sector without demand<strong>in</strong>g accountability.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce the attacks on New York and Wash<strong>in</strong>gton on September 11, 2001, <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

prom<strong>in</strong>ence has grown. <strong>Ethiopia</strong> is now a partner and a “frontl<strong>in</strong>e state” <strong>in</strong> the U.S. war on terrorism.<br />

Correspond<strong>in</strong>gly, aid to <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n security forces has <strong>in</strong>creased and <strong>in</strong>ternational criticism <strong>of</strong> the government has<br />

become even more muted. The newly designated U.S. ambassador to <strong>Ethiopia</strong> told Human Rights Watch that<br />

human rights and the “war on terror” are both important objectives for the United States. 226 But a senior State<br />

Department <strong>of</strong>ficial told Human Rights Watch that <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s cooperation <strong>in</strong> gather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>telligence from Sudan<br />

and Somalia and <strong>in</strong> other matters he was not at liberty to discuss is so important to U.S. <strong>in</strong>terests that the U.S.<br />

effectively wields little if any leverage over the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n government. He said that, although the U.S. is aware<br />

that <strong>Ethiopia</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>terests do not always co<strong>in</strong>cide with its own and listens to its partner “with a jaundiced ear,” the<br />

country’s human rights record is “not a factor” <strong>in</strong> the bilateral relationship “as a po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> fact.” 227<br />

The U.S. Embassy <strong>in</strong> Addis Ababa has decl<strong>in</strong>ed to take a strong stand aga<strong>in</strong>st police shoot<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong><br />

protesters and other egregious abuses reported <strong>in</strong> its annual human rights report. 228 Although the U.S. provides<br />

substantial support to the <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n military, which reportedly has a budget <strong>of</strong> some U.S.$300 million, the U.S.<br />

has not used its leverage to ensure that adequate funds be allocated to non-lethal crowd control techniques or that<br />

perpetrators <strong>of</strong> human rights <strong>violations</strong> are held accountable. 229 Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong>n civil society organizations<br />

224 “The students do not have more rights.” Sub-Saharan Informer.<br />

225 Rule 5.5 on Student Publications, Senate Legislation <strong>of</strong> Addis Ababa University (with revisions up to the end <strong>of</strong> the 1985-<br />

86 <strong>academic</strong> year), February 1987, p. 208. S<strong>in</strong>ce 1987, the rules have been updated by circulars but the university has<br />

apparently not published current rules together. An adm<strong>in</strong>istrator <strong>in</strong>terviewed by Human Rights Watch said he was not<br />

aware <strong>of</strong> any relevant updates. Human Rights Watch <strong>in</strong>terview, Addis Ababa, July 23, 2002.<br />

226 Human Rights Watch <strong>in</strong>terview, U.S. ambassador to <strong>Ethiopia</strong>, Aurelia Brazael, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, D.C., Nov. 4, 2002.<br />

227 Human Rights Watch <strong>in</strong>terview with a senior state department <strong>of</strong>ficial, Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC, September 30, 2002.<br />

228 See, U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> State, “<strong>Ethiopia</strong>: Country Reports on Human Rights Practices – 2001.”<br />

229 When a Human Rights Watch researcher asked an American diplomat responsible for economic affairs to comment on the<br />

government’s claim that it could not afford non-lethal means <strong>of</strong> crowd control although it receives U.S. military assistance<br />

and its military budget is reportedly U.S.$300 million, she curtly replied “For whatever reason, they don’t have non-lethal<br />

Human Rights Watch<br />

42<br />

January 2003, Vol. 15,No. 2 (A)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!