Return to War - Human Rights Watch
Return to War - Human Rights Watch
Return to War - Human Rights Watch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
At a public meeting on April 6, 2007, the minister for health, Nimal Sripala de Silva,<br />
described journalists as “mad dogs” and recommended that they be given an antirabies<br />
injection. The minister’s angry outburst was a reaction <strong>to</strong> a series of exposes<br />
on corruption in the health sec<strong>to</strong>r. 172<br />
In June 2006 the government reactivated the Press Council, a media regula<strong>to</strong>ry body,<br />
which it had scrapped in favor of a Press Complaints Commission (PCC) in 2003. The<br />
change sparked protests from media advocacy groups in Sri Lanka because the<br />
Press Council Act, on which the Press Council is based, prohibits the publishing of<br />
certain cabinet decisions, cabinet documents, and defense, fiscal and security<br />
matters (section 16). 173 Section 16(3) prohibits the publication of an official secret as<br />
vaguely defined in the Official Secrets Act of 1955.<br />
On September 20, 2006, the Ministry of Defense sent a letter <strong>to</strong> media institutions,<br />
requesting that “news gathered should be subjected <strong>to</strong> clarification and<br />
confirmation.” 174 Journalists and edi<strong>to</strong>rs viewed the letter as an attempt <strong>to</strong> impose<br />
censorship.<br />
Journalists and human rights activists explained <strong>to</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> that they<br />
now engage in self-censorship <strong>to</strong> avoid running afoul of the authorities. As one<br />
senior journalist <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, “The government wants <strong>to</strong> look at<br />
everything we write, wants <strong>to</strong> vet articles and condemn those which are not favorable.<br />
If this is not censorship, what is?” 175<br />
Attacks on Uthayan and Sudar Oli<br />
The staffs of the popular Tamil dailies Uthayan and Sudar Oli have been repeatedly<br />
targeted because of the papers’ alleged pro-LTTE stance.<br />
172 PK Balachandran, “Lankan minister calls scribes ‘mad dogs’,” Hindustan Times, April 12, 2007,<br />
http://www.hindustantimes.com/S<strong>to</strong>ryPage/S<strong>to</strong>ryPage.aspx?id=5afe13bb-7aaf-404a-8552-98326d71fb95 (accessed July 16,<br />
2007).<br />
173 Kelum Bandara and Kasun Yapa Karunaratne, “Media associations concerned about PC,” Daily Mirror, June 26, 2006,<br />
http://www.dailymirror.lk/2006/06/24/front/04.asp (accessed July 16, 2007).<br />
174 International Federation of Journalists, “International Fact-Finding and Advocacy Mission <strong>to</strong> Sri Lanka,” Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 11, 2006,<br />
http://www.ifj-asia.org/page/srilankamission061011.html (accessed July 16, 2007).<br />
175 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with journalist, Colombo, March 4, 2007.<br />
<strong>Return</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>War</strong> 84