13.01.2014 Views

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Given the wide ranging powers provided <strong>to</strong> the State and its officers<br />

under these regulations, the absence of independent review, the<br />

his<strong>to</strong>ry of abuse of similar draconian legislation, including the<br />

Prevention of Terrorism Act, <strong>to</strong> stifle legitimate democratic activity and<br />

political dissent, and the culture of impunity that has developed in Sri<br />

Lanka in recent months in particular, such a clause could easily<br />

become one that promotes impunity rather than providing for<br />

immunity for bona fide actions. 139<br />

With respect <strong>to</strong> the treatment of detainees, the Emergency Regulations enacted by<br />

the Sri Lankan government are contrary <strong>to</strong> international human rights standards on<br />

their face and in practice. The International Covenant on Civil and Political <strong>Rights</strong>, <strong>to</strong><br />

which Sri Lanka is a state party, permits limitations on some rights during periods of<br />

national emergency. However, such measures are limited <strong>to</strong> the extent strictly<br />

required by the exigencies of the situation. States must provide careful justification<br />

for any specific measures based on a proclamation of a national emergency. Certain<br />

basic rights, such as the right <strong>to</strong> life and <strong>to</strong> be free from <strong>to</strong>rture and other cruel,<br />

inhuman or degrading treatment, may never be restricted. The principles of legality<br />

and the rule of law require that the fundamental requirements of a fair trial be<br />

respected even under Emergency Regulations. 140<br />

The Emergency (Miscellaneous Provisions and Powers) Regulations<br />

(EMPPR), August 2005<br />

The government enacted the Emergency Regulations on August 14, 2005. The new<br />

measures were justified by referring <strong>to</strong> the “terrorist challenge which claimed the life<br />

of Minister Kadirgamar and which requires adequate security measures <strong>to</strong> ensure<br />

that terror cannot act with impunity.” 141<br />

139 Centre of Policy Alternatives, “Statement on the Introduction of the Emergency (Prevention and Prohibition of Terrorism)<br />

Regulations 2006,” December 2006.<br />

140 See UN <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> Committee, General Comment 29, States of Emergency (article 4), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11<br />

(2001), reprinted in Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> Treaty<br />

Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6 at 186 (2003). Sri Lanka ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political <strong>Rights</strong> in<br />

1980.<br />

141 President Chandrika Kumaratunga’s Address <strong>to</strong> the Nation, August 14, 2005, South Asia Terrorism Portal,<br />

http://www.satp.org/satporgtp/countries/shrilanka/document/papers/Kumaratunga_Address_<strong>to</strong>_the_Nation.htm (accessed<br />

July 2, 2007).<br />

<strong>Return</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>War</strong> 72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!