Return to War - Human Rights Watch
Return to War - Human Rights Watch Return to War - Human Rights Watch
Villagers and survivors of the attack took the wounded to the health clinic in Kathiravelli and then to the small hospital in Vaharai. Meanwhile, the military prevented the ICRC and SLMM from accessing the school site until about 4 p.m. Finally, an ICRC convoy of six ambulances, a bus, a truck, and three cars reached Vaharai hospital and transferred 69 serious cases to Valaichchenai hospital. 68 On November 10 and 11 Human Rights Watch visited the Batticaloa hospital, which received other wounded persons. Shrapnel wounds to the stomach, lower back, and arms and legs were predominant among the women. “Many people were cooking and were hit by shrapnel,” a wounded woman said. 69 In total, 62 people died. According to hospital records obtained by Human Rights Watch, 47 people, ranging in age from one to 74 years old, suffered injuries. Twentythree of these victims were under 18. Twenty-one were women and 26 were men. Three of these five children died in the Kathiravelli school attack: Gunanathan Suveeka, age 8 (first from left), Gunanathan Rajkumar, 6 (third from left) and Gunanathan Sarojinidari, 8 (fifth from left). © 2006 private 68 “Sri Lanka: ICRC Deplores Attacks on Civilians,” ICRC press release, November 9, 2006, http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/sri-lanka-news-091106 (accessed May 7, 2007). 69 Human Rights Watch interview with displaced person, Batticaloa, November 11, 2006. 41 Human Rights Watch August 2007
While describing the loss of civilian lives as “a tragedy,” the Sri Lankan government sought to justify its attack as lawful under the laws of armed conflict. In a statement on November 9, the Ministry of Defence said that army units had responded to two early morning artillery attacks from LTTE forces only after confirming the location of the LTTE weapons through the “mortar locating radar” and “observation points.” 70 Government defense spokesman Keheliya Rambukwella said the government regretted the incident but the “[a]ctions by the defense authorities were inevitable.” 71 Rambukwella said the government would open an investigation. Human Rights Watch asked the government who is conducting the investigation and when will findings be announced, but the government said it could not answer these questions because the answers contained “security sensitive information.” 72 More pointedly, the government claimed that the LTTE had used camp residents as “human shields” to deter government forces from responding to LTTE attacks. “The Tigers had been planning this situation since the beginning of this month by detaining the innocent civilians in those areas by force to be used as a human shield when the time arises,” a Defence Ministry statement right after the incident said. 73 Human Rights Watch asked the Sri Lankan government how it had determined that the LTTE used human shields. The government replied, Thousands of innocent civilians who came into government controlled areas complained that they were treated inhumanely by the LTTE and used as a human shield. Various international and local independent organizations too confirmed this fact. This information was supported by government sources. 74 70 “Civilians at the Mercy of the Tigers,” Government of Sri Lanka press release. 71 “Sri Lankan Government ‘Regrets’ Civilian Massacre,” Agence France-Presse, November 9, 2006. 72 Sri Lankan government response to Human Rights Watch, July 12, 2007. 73 “Refugee Camp Bombing Kills 65 in Sri Lanka,” Agence France-Presse, November 8, 2006. 74 Sri Lankan government response to Human Rights Watch, July 12, 2007. Return to War 42
- Page 1 and 2: Sri Lanka Return to War Human Right
- Page 3 and 4: Karuna group ......................
- Page 5 and 6: I. Summary What I am saying is, if
- Page 7 and 8: extrajudicial killings to unlawful
- Page 9 and 10: 2002. Since January 2006 more than
- Page 11 and 12: against them, and list the location
- Page 13 and 14: Emergency Regulations (372 Tamils,
- Page 15 and 16: The mother of an abducted boy from
- Page 17 and 18: disappearances. The police released
- Page 19 and 20: commission, highlighting examples o
- Page 21 and 22: Methodology This report is based pr
- Page 23 and 24: discriminating against Tamils in th
- Page 25 and 26: intimidation to force civilians who
- Page 27 and 28: International humanitarian law proh
- Page 29 and 30: in which an LTTE cadre shot and kil
- Page 31 and 32: the Savukady camp in Batticaloa to
- Page 33 and 34: they would no longer be responsible
- Page 35 and 36: In mid-May the government began a n
- Page 37 and 38: On May 29, UNHCR commented on the g
- Page 39 and 40: Grama Niladari Divisions (the small
- Page 41 and 42: The salvos landed in and around the
- Page 43: didn’t take him to the hospital b
- Page 47 and 48: saw no weapons, no bunkers or artil
- Page 49 and 50: V. Enforced Disappearances and Abdu
- Page 51 and 52: months of 2007. 84 A government com
- Page 53 and 54: In one illustrative case documented
- Page 55 and 56: The Valvettiturai police registered
- Page 57 and 58: would send him by bus or train to T
- Page 59 and 60: wife tried his cell phone several t
- Page 61 and 62: then that his brother had paid, alt
- Page 63 and 64: as the disseminators of “LTTE pro
- Page 65 and 66: It is evident that many of the [dis
- Page 67 and 68: The government’s lack of commitme
- Page 69 and 70: A lodge-owner who had 29 out of 36
- Page 71 and 72: arguing that evicting Tamils from C
- Page 73 and 74: VII. Emergency Regulations In Augus
- Page 75 and 76: Given the wide ranging powers provi
- Page 77 and 78: Large-scale arrests of Tamil youth
- Page 79 and 80: held, how many had been charged wit
- Page 81 and 82: Various United Nations principles i
- Page 83 and 84: In addition, the regulations establ
- Page 85 and 86: individuals and groups working to r
- Page 87 and 88: At a public meeting on April 6, 200
- Page 89 and 90: On April 30, 2007, unidentified gun
- Page 91 and 92: “We have blocked it as per a gove
- Page 93 and 94: conference said they had already ca
Villagers and survivors of the attack <strong>to</strong>ok the wounded <strong>to</strong> the health clinic in<br />
Kathiravelli and then <strong>to</strong> the small hospital in Vaharai. Meanwhile, the military<br />
prevented the ICRC and SLMM from accessing the school site until about 4 p.m.<br />
Finally, an ICRC convoy of six ambulances, a bus, a truck, and three cars reached<br />
Vaharai hospital and transferred 69 serious cases <strong>to</strong> Valaichchenai hospital. 68<br />
On November 10 and 11 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> visited the Batticaloa hospital, which<br />
received other wounded persons. Shrapnel wounds <strong>to</strong> the s<strong>to</strong>mach, lower back, and<br />
arms and legs were predominant among the women. “Many people were cooking<br />
and were hit by shrapnel,” a wounded woman said. 69<br />
In <strong>to</strong>tal, 62 people died. According <strong>to</strong> hospital records obtained by <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong><br />
<strong>Watch</strong>, 47 people, ranging in age from one <strong>to</strong> 74 years old, suffered injuries. Twentythree<br />
of these victims were under 18. Twenty-one were women and 26 were men.<br />
Three of these five children died in the Kathiravelli school attack: Gunanathan Suveeka, age 8 (first from<br />
left), Gunanathan Rajkumar, 6 (third from left) and Gunanathan Sarojinidari, 8 (fifth from left).<br />
© 2006 private<br />
68 “Sri Lanka: ICRC Deplores Attacks on Civilians,” ICRC press release, November 9, 2006,<br />
http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/sri-lanka-news-091106 (accessed May 7, 2007).<br />
69 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with displaced person, Batticaloa, November 11, 2006.<br />
41<br />
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> August 2007