13.01.2014 Views

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

workers who have visited the sites, food and security are major concerns. The events<br />

are described in more detail below.<br />

The UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement provide that every internally<br />

displaced person has the right <strong>to</strong> liberty of movement, the right <strong>to</strong> seek safety in<br />

another part of the country, and the right <strong>to</strong> be protected against forcible return <strong>to</strong><br />

any place where their safety would be at risk.<br />

On June 18, <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> asked the Sri Lankan government about its plans <strong>to</strong><br />

resettle displaced persons from Sampur and East Mutur currently residing in the<br />

Killevedi site, and plans for compensating and otherwise assisting persons from<br />

areas where residents will not be allowed <strong>to</strong> return. The government replied that, due<br />

<strong>to</strong> the establishment of a High Security Zone in Mutur (see below) some civilians<br />

would be relocated elsewhere “in consultation with the wishes of the residents and<br />

the choice would also be given <strong>to</strong> even move <strong>to</strong> Batticaloa.” 33<br />

March 2007 forced returns from Batticaloa<br />

Beginning March 12, the government returned people from at least six divisions in<br />

Batticaloa district. More than 900 individuals were sent <strong>to</strong> Trincomalee district as<br />

part of a plan <strong>to</strong> return approximately 2,800 internally displaced persons.<br />

The returns were accomplished with a range of abuses. The government notified<br />

some displaced persons slated for return one or two days in advance by placing lists<br />

of names at camp sites. The lists identified persons who had refused <strong>to</strong> sign letters<br />

consenting <strong>to</strong> return and those who said they were scared or unwilling <strong>to</strong> return. 34 To<br />

pressure individuals <strong>to</strong> return, government officials and military personnel<br />

threatened <strong>to</strong> withdraw humanitarian aid, food, and other essential supplies. 35 Some<br />

officials threatened families that they would revoke their family cards, which entitle<br />

them <strong>to</strong> food rations. In some cases, the security forces reportedly have said that<br />

33 Sri Lankan government response <strong>to</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, July 12, 2007.<br />

34 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with humanitarian worker, May 23, 2007.<br />

35 The Sri Lankan government <strong>to</strong>ld <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> that “all those who have chosen not <strong>to</strong> be settled are continuing <strong>to</strong> be<br />

provided with all required assistance from the Government of Sri Lanka.” Sri Lankan government response <strong>to</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong><br />

<strong>Watch</strong>, July 12, 2007.<br />

29<br />

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> August 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!