13.01.2014 Views

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the current context, in particular, the apparent renewed systematic<br />

practice of enforced disappearance and the killings of Red Cross<br />

workers, it is critical that the Commission and IIGEP not be portrayed<br />

as a substitute for robust, effective measures including national and<br />

international human rights moni<strong>to</strong>ring.<br />

Commission chair Udalagama defended the CoI’s work. “Members of the<br />

commission are confident that the CoI could continue <strong>to</strong> discharge its functions<br />

independently and that the mandate of the commission can be implemented in the<br />

best interests of justice,” he said. 278<br />

Regarding the involvement of the at<strong>to</strong>rney general’s office, he said the commission<br />

was “satisfied regarding the professional integrity and the professional services<br />

being rendered.” On funding, he said the government “has assured the CoI that it<br />

will make available all required resources for the commission.”<br />

The IIGEP issued a second report four days later, which said the commission’s<br />

conduct was “inconsistent with international norms and standards” and that failure<br />

<strong>to</strong> take corrective action “will result in the commission not fulfilling its fact-finding<br />

mandate in conformity with those norms and standards.”<br />

In particular, the IIGEP again questioned the role of the at<strong>to</strong>rney general’s<br />

department in assisting the CoI, highlighting the conflict of interest that<br />

“compromises national and international principles of independence and<br />

impartiality.” 279<br />

The report cited specific examples of the lack of impartiality by the at<strong>to</strong>rney general’s<br />

office, such as the improper leading of witnesses. The report concluded that “the<br />

commission does not seem <strong>to</strong> have taken sufficient corrective measures <strong>to</strong> ensure<br />

that its proceedings are transparent and conform with international norms and<br />

standards of independence, impartiality and competence.”<br />

278 “Response from the Chairman of the Commission of Inquiry <strong>to</strong> the IIGEP’s Public Statement,” June 11, 2007. For the full text<br />

of the response, see http://www.dailymirror.lk/2007/06/12/feat/01.asp (accessed June 28, 2007).<br />

279 “International Independent Group of Eminent Persons Public Statement,” June 15, 2007.<br />

<strong>Return</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>War</strong> 120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!