13.01.2014 Views

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Members of the IIGEP have also expressed concerns. “We need <strong>to</strong> set up the network<br />

of protection before [asking] the people <strong>to</strong> talk, otherwise we will face<br />

assassinations,” said Bernard Kouchner, a member of the IIGEP until May, when he<br />

became foreign minister of France. He added, “Without that, this is impossible. The<br />

number of people who have been assassinated is <strong>to</strong>o high.” 272<br />

Fifth, the mandate of the commission allows a high level of participation by the<br />

at<strong>to</strong>rney general’s office and the police. The former assists with investigations and<br />

inquiries and the latter works with the commission’s investigating unit. The<br />

involvement of government agencies in an ostensibly independent commission’s<br />

work raises serious concerns about conflict of interest. The issue of the<br />

independence of the at<strong>to</strong>rney general’s office is particularly relevant given that the<br />

at<strong>to</strong>rney general is unilaterally appointed by the executive, bypassing the 17 th<br />

amendment (see above). As the Centre for Policy Alternatives wrote in one of its<br />

briefing papers on the CoI,<br />

With the increasing involvement of the [at<strong>to</strong>rney general’s] department,<br />

many will question whether the CoI and IIGEP are in reality<br />

independent of the State or whether they are indeed functioning with<br />

and/or on the advice of the Government and Government ac<strong>to</strong>rs. 273<br />

The first months of the CoI’s work have heightened these concerns. Although the<br />

Commissions of Inquiry Act and the CoI mandate empower the CoI <strong>to</strong> obtain<br />

information for its investigations, the government is reported <strong>to</strong> have withheld some<br />

of the requested material. According <strong>to</strong> a press account, the Colombo magistrate<br />

refused <strong>to</strong> provide the CoI with records it wanted on the assassination of Foreign<br />

Minister Kadirgamar because releasing the documents would interfere with an<br />

ongoing investigation. 274<br />

272 Simon Gardner, “INTERVIEW-Witness Protection Vital <strong>to</strong> Sri Lanka Abuses Probe,” Reuters, March 10, 2007.<br />

273 Centre for Policy Alternatives, “Commission of Inquiry and the International Independent Group of Eminent Persons:<br />

Commentary on Developments,” January-April 2007, CPA Policy Brief no. 2, 2007<br />

http://www.cpalanka.org/research_papers/Policy_Brief_2_2007.pdf (accessed May 30, 2007).<br />

274 Susitha R. Fernando, “Release of Kardigamar documents <strong>to</strong> Presidential Commission refused,” Daily Mirror, March 30,<br />

2007, http://www.dailymirror.lk/2007/03/30/news/03.asp (accessed July 16, 2007).<br />

<strong>Return</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>War</strong> 118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!