Return to War - Human Rights Watch

Return to War - Human Rights Watch Return to War - Human Rights Watch

13.01.2014 Views

X. Impunity for Rights Violations Since the beginning of Sri Lanka’s civil war more than two decades ago, successive governments have consistently failed to adequately investigate or prosecute those in the security forces responsible for serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. In cases of enforced disappearances, torture, indiscriminate attacks, and targeted killings, successive Sri Lankan governments have consistently failed to hold accountable members of the police or military who commit serious crimes. 232 Some observers seeking to explain this culture of impunity point to weaknesses in the criminal justice system, which has proved unable to deliver justice for victims of common crimes, let alone victims of serious crimes involving the military or police. Sri Lankan lawyers report long delays in hearings, threats to witnesses and family members, and government officials working on behalf of the accused. These structural obstacles seriously hinder the judicial process. But they are not as significant as the government’s lack of political will to prosecute soldiers, police, and other government officials and agents implicated in wrongdoing. Even when there is overwhelming evidence of government forces responsibility for abuse, successive governments have rarely conducted an investigation resulting in a successful prosecution. Then Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera highlighted the problem of impunity in the December 2006 letter he sent to President Rajapaksa: “Even when investigations are being carried out, the process of perpetrators being brought to justice is extremely slow,” he wrote. “As a result, there is a perception that authorities are turning a blind eye to these matters. As such, the impression of a culture of impunity gains further credence.” 233 232 See Law & Society Trust, Sri Lanka, “State of Human Rights 1999.” 233 The Sunday Times Online, vol. 41-no. 39, February 25, 2007, http://sundaytimes.lk/070225/News/102news.html (accessed July 2, 2007). 105 Human Rights Watch August 2007

Over the past 18 months, the government has failed to adequately investigate dozens of prominent crimes in which the involvement of the security forces is alleged. The most publicized case is the execution-style murder of the 17 aid workers from the Paris-based NGO Action Contre la Faim in Mutur in August 2006 (see Chapter VIII). Available evidence indicates that the killings could have been committed by government security forces. 234 The attorney general has been conducting an investigation but, according to international monitors, the process is fraught with difficulties that place the government’s sincerity in doubt. In March 2007, based on observations of the legal proceedings, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) found “significant flaws” in the investigation by the local police and criminal investigation department. ICJ recommended “the establishment of a team independent of the police and security forces to investigate this crime, to identify the perpetrators and to report to the Attorney-General, who should then ensure that those responsible are prosecuted.” 235 Action Contra La Faim also went public with its concerns, saying in June 2007 that it questioned “whether the investigation will lead to an indictment against those responsible.” 236 In his report to the Human Rights Council on September 19, 2006, the United Nations special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions summed up the inability of state institutions to address serious crimes: National accountability mechanisms are important but insufficient for achieving the necessary accountability. The criminal justice system police investigations, prosecutions, and trials have utterly failed to provide accountability. Indeed, it is an enduring scandal that 234 Human Rights Watch interview with official from the Attorney General’s department, Colombo, June 25, 2007. 235 “Sri Lanka: ICJ Inquest Observer Finds Flaws in Investigation into Killing of ACF Aid Workers,” International Commission of Jurists press release, April 23, 2007, http://www.icj.org/news.php3?id_article=4151&lang=en (accessed May 14, 2007). 236 “The Muthur Massacre: ACF Questions the Facts,” Action Contra La Faim press release, June 22, 2007. Return to War 106

Over the past 18 months, the government has failed <strong>to</strong> adequately investigate<br />

dozens of prominent crimes in which the involvement of the security forces is alleged.<br />

The most publicized case is the execution-style murder of the 17 aid workers from the<br />

Paris-based NGO Action Contre la Faim in Mutur in August 2006 (see Chapter VIII).<br />

Available evidence indicates that the killings could have been committed by<br />

government security forces. 234<br />

The at<strong>to</strong>rney general has been conducting an investigation but, according <strong>to</strong><br />

international moni<strong>to</strong>rs, the process is fraught with difficulties that place the<br />

government’s sincerity in doubt. In March 2007, based on observations of the legal<br />

proceedings, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) found “significant flaws” in<br />

the investigation by the local police and criminal investigation department. ICJ<br />

recommended “the establishment of a team independent of the police and security<br />

forces <strong>to</strong> investigate this crime, <strong>to</strong> identify the perpetra<strong>to</strong>rs and <strong>to</strong> report <strong>to</strong> the<br />

At<strong>to</strong>rney-General, who should then ensure that those responsible are prosecuted.” 235<br />

Action Contra La Faim also went public with its concerns, saying in June 2007 that it<br />

questioned “whether the investigation will lead <strong>to</strong> an indictment against those<br />

responsible.” 236<br />

In his report <strong>to</strong> the <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> Council on September 19, 2006, the United Nations<br />

special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions summed up the<br />

inability of state institutions <strong>to</strong> address serious crimes:<br />

National accountability mechanisms are important but insufficient for<br />

achieving the necessary accountability. The criminal justice system<br />

police investigations, prosecutions, and trials have utterly failed <strong>to</strong><br />

provide accountability. Indeed, it is an enduring scandal that<br />

234 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> interview with official from the At<strong>to</strong>rney General’s department, Colombo, June 25, 2007.<br />

235 “Sri Lanka: ICJ Inquest Observer Finds Flaws in Investigation in<strong>to</strong> Killing of ACF Aid Workers,” International Commission of<br />

Jurists press release, April 23, 2007, http://www.icj.org/news.php3?id_article=4151&lang=en (accessed May 14, 2007).<br />

236 “The Muthur Massacre: ACF Questions the Facts,” Action Contra La Faim press release, June 22, 2007.<br />

<strong>Return</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>War</strong> 106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!