10. Lošinjski dani bioetike - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
10. Lošinjski dani bioetike - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo 10. Lošinjski dani bioetike - Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
IVICA KELAM Osnovna škola »Šećerana«, Beli Manastir, Hrvatska / Primary School “Šećerana”, Beli Manastir, Croatia GMO IZMEĐU MITA I STVARNOSTI Slučaj argentina Pod ovim naslovom želimo progovoriti o problematici GMO-a na primjeru jedne zemlje koja je najdalje otišla u prihvaćanju GMO-tehnologije. Iako se GMO-tehnologija prikazuje kao jedino rješenje za problem gladi u svijetu i sve veću ekološku katastrofu, iskustva iz zemalja koje su usvojile GMO-tehnologiju su zabrinjavajuća. U našem radu želimo se posebno osvrnuti na Argentinu kao primjer zemlje koja je oduševljeno prihvatila GMO-tehnologiju ne razmišljajući o posljedicama. Argentina je 15 godina nakon uvođenja GMO-kultura u poljoprivredu postala zemlja ovisna o GMO-monokulturama, posebno RR soji. Želimo istražiti sve aspekte potpune ovisnosti poljoprivrede o GMO-usjevima, s posebnim naglaskom na negativne aspekte. Mnogi problemi izlaze na vidjelo: od prevelike upotrebe herbicida koji negativno utječu na biološku raznovrsnost i imaju negativan utjecaj na ljudsko zdravlje i zdravlje životinja sve do problema masovne sječe šuma pa čak i pojave gladi. Argentina je poučan primjer za Hrvatsku, u svjetlu sve glasnijih zahtjeva za uvođenjem GMO-usjeva u poljoprivredu, iz kojeg mjerodavna tijela mogu izvući pouke. GMO BETWEEN MYTH AND REALITY The Case of Argentina Under this title we want to talk about the GMO issue in the case of a country that has gone furthest in the acceptance of GMO technology. Although GMO technology appears as the only solution to the problem of world hunger and the growing environmental disaster, the experiences of countries that have adopted GMO technology are worrying. In our work we want to make special reference to Argentina as an example of a country that has enthusiastically adopted GMO technology without considering the consequences. Argentina 15 years after the introduction of GMO crops in agriculture has become a country dependent on the particular GMO mo- 98
noculture RR soybean. We investigate all aspects of total dependence on agriculture of GMO crops with special emphasis on the negative aspects. Many of the problems include: the excessive use of herbicides that have a negative impact on biodiversity, as well as on human and animal health, the case of massive deforestation and even famines. Argentina is an instructive example for Croatia in the light of ever-growing demands for the introduction of GMO crops in agriculture, from which the relevant authorities could draw lessons. GÁBOR KOVÁCS Institute for Philosophical Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary / Institut za filozofska istraživanja, Mađarska akademija znanosti, Budimpešta, Mađarska NOTIONS OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF HANNAH ARENDT Modernity, in philosophical and sociological literature, has ‘traditionally’ been presented as the age when artefacts supplant nature and destroy the originally given natural environment. The process of modernization, from this point of view, is the process of denaturalization. This widely shared conviction has basically been questioned by Hannah Arendt. During the centuries of modern age, in the detriment of the commonly created and uphold human world, process of re-naturalization has been taking place, argues Arendt. This means, seen from other aspect, that modernity is the age of world-alienation. It is one of the results of modern science that human beings lose their confidence in the reliability of their senses. The Arendtian critique of modernity, which has deeply been influenced by Martin Heidegger’s philosophy, takes a difference between the notions of earth and world. In Arendt’s theory technology is the main culprit for the processes of re-naturalization. What are our relations, according to Arendt, to earth and world and what kinds of obligations can be deduced from them? These will be the main questions of my planned paper. 99
- Page 47 and 48: fessor and Head of the Department o
- Page 49 and 50: 8. Ako ove ideje zažive, priznavan
- Page 51 and 52: TAMARA SERTIĆ, HRVOJE JURIĆ Facul
- Page 62 and 63: Pretisak iz / Reprint from: Dani Fr
- Page 65 and 66: simpozij INTEGRATIVNA BIOETIKA I NO
- Page 67 and 68: produce his external world, and to
- Page 69 and 70: isti i u iscjeliteljskim zahvatima
- Page 71 and 72: JASNA BURIĆ Hrvatska radiotelevizi
- Page 73 and 74: zaključku se navodi tablični preg
- Page 75 and 76: JOSIP ČULIG Odjel prehrambene tehn
- Page 77 and 78: ASPEKTI MEDICINSKE ETIKE U ORTOPEDS
- Page 79 and 80: socijalnoj odgovornosti i partnerst
- Page 81 and 82: JULIJA ERHARDT Faculty of Science,
- Page 83 and 84: HEDA FESTINI Rijeka, Hrvatska / Rij
- Page 85 and 86: LIDIJA GAJSKI Dom zdravlja Zagreb-C
- Page 87 and 88: NADA GOSIĆ Medicinski fakultet, Sv
- Page 89 and 90: BIOETHICAL ISSUES IN THE FATWAS OF
- Page 91 and 92: stvarne svrhe za čovjeka. Najopasn
- Page 93 and 94: islamskih izvora koji su mjerodavni
- Page 95 and 96: SCIENCE BETWEEN POTENTIALITY AND AC
- Page 97: MARINA KATINIĆ Zagreb, Hrvatska /
- Page 101 and 102: Unatoč činjenici da većina kocka
- Page 103 and 104: DŽENANA KULUGLIJA 1 , AMER OVČINA
- Page 105 and 106: Although many medical workers resis
- Page 107 and 108: MÖGLICHE BEITRÄGE DER INTEGRATIVE
- Page 109 and 110: However, even though this opinion i
- Page 111 and 112: NADA MLADINA, ŽARKO MLADINA Medici
- Page 113 and 114: cionistički misaoni obrazac na uč
- Page 115 and 116: ni put da bi studirao pravo. Zaposl
- Page 117 and 118: nomnijih odluka. Osnovna forma ove
- Page 119 and 120: ZAREMA OBRADOVIĆ 1 , IFETA ĆESIR-
- Page 121 and 122: korna i nove, moderno dizajnirane z
- Page 123 and 124: couple was arrested, and pleaded gu
- Page 125 and 126: tion needed to adequately explain t
- Page 127 and 128: SOCIAL SYSTEM AS A BIOETHICAL QUEST
- Page 129 and 130: neuro-surgical means for non-medica
- Page 131 and 132: kulturne perspektive te čitavo dru
- Page 133 and 134: okvira temeljenog na pitanju ‘jes
- Page 135 and 136: INTEGRATIVE BIOETHICS AND URGENT PR
- Page 137 and 138: FULVIO ŠURAN Odjel za studij na ta
- Page 139 and 140: Integrative bioethics is also a ver
- Page 141 and 142: »UNCANNY VALLEY« I ČOVJEKOV IDEN
- Page 143 and 144: vrijednost. A važenje vrijednosti
- Page 145 and 146: The aim of the paper is to present:
- Page 147 and 148: In the paper, the author exposes fe
noculture RR soybean. We investigate all aspects of total dependence on<br />
agriculture of GMO crops with special emphasis on the negative aspects.<br />
Many of the problems include: the excessive use of herbicides that have a<br />
negative impact on biodiversity, as well as on human and animal health, the<br />
case of massive deforestation and even famines. Argentina is an instructive<br />
example for Croatia in the light of ever-growing demands for the introduction<br />
of GMO crops in agriculture, from which the relevant authorities<br />
could draw lessons.<br />
GÁBOR KOVÁCS<br />
Institute for Philosophical Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences,<br />
Budapest, Hungary /<br />
Institut za filozofska istraživanja, Mađarska akademija znanosti,<br />
Budimpešta, Mađarska<br />
NOTIONS OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL<br />
IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF HANNAH ARENDT<br />
Modernity, in philosophical and sociological literature, has ‘traditionally’<br />
been presented as the age when artefacts supplant nature and destroy<br />
the originally given natural environment. The process of modernization,<br />
from this point of view, is the process of denaturalization. This widely<br />
shared conviction has basically been questioned by Hannah Arendt. During<br />
the centuries of modern age, in the detriment of the commonly created<br />
and uphold human world, process of re-naturalization has been taking<br />
place, argues Arendt. This means, seen from other aspect, that modernity<br />
is the age of world-alienation. It is one of the results of modern science<br />
that human beings lose their confidence in the reliability of their senses.<br />
The Arendtian critique of modernity, which has deeply been influenced by<br />
Martin Heidegger’s philosophy, takes a difference between the notions of<br />
earth and world. In Arendt’s theory technology is the main culprit for the<br />
processes of re-naturalization. What are our relations, according to Arendt,<br />
to earth and world and what kinds of obligations can be deduced from<br />
them? These will be the main questions of my planned paper.<br />
99