The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council
The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council
appendix D Material Assets In We consider that the Plan has the potential for significant effects on tourism resources and forestry. Effects relating to public transport could be considered under the air parameter, if considered likely to be significant (see Air above). Where possible, we will seek to encourage the use of local and sustainable materials and in development of recreation infrastructure (e.g. as set out in Historic Scotland’s Corporate Plan and accompanying SEA). Cultural Heritage In We consider that the Plan should have positive effects for the promotion and conservation of the Antonine Wall and other heritage features. There is the possibility of conflicts between the priorities of cultural and natural heritage, with the potential to reduce positive effects. Landscape and geodiversity In Establishment of land management strategies and guidance could potentially have negative and/or positive effects on landscape and scenic value, and geodiversity; the assessment process will allow identification and mitigation of any potential conflicts between cultural heritage priorities, including those relating to the landscape setting of the Antonine Wall WHS, and broader landscape priorities. 4.2 Scoping the parts of the Consultation Document to be included in the assessment In the scoping report we noted that the assessment would be undertaken at a level of detail that enabled us to broadly predict the likely significant effects. Table 3 clarifies which elements of the consultative draft Management Plan we have assessed. Table 3: Sections of Consultation Document to be assessed Section/s Assessed Y/N Reasons 1. Introduction No These sections set the context of both 2. Requirement for a management plan Plan and assessment, and describe the consultation process. 3. Consultative draft 4. Consultation 5. Responses to this consultation 6. Handling your response 7. Managing the World Heritage Site No This section sets out the roles and responsibilities of those involved in the management of the Antonine Wall WHS, and the range of stakeholders who have an interest in the site. 8. Delivery of the 2007-12 Management Plan No This section reviews achievements and developments over the life of the 2007-12 Management Plan, and draws out lessons learnt over this period. 9. Looking Forward Yes This section introduces the vision and long-term aims of the Plan, and sets out underlying issues and medium-term objectives; the content of this section will underpin all outcomes from the Management Plan. 52
Strategic Environmental Assessment: Environmental Report 4.3 Evolution of the environment in the absence of the Plan If the Plan were not developed, it is considered that the likely future changes to the area could include: • fewer people would enjoy, understand and value the cultural and natural heritage of the Antonine Wall WHS and its landscape; • continuing risk of negative impacts on cultural and natural heritage through land management actions; • more conflicts between cultural heritage and natural heritage through land management actions; • less understanding of the impacts of climate change on the Antonine Wall WHS and its landscape, and consequently less likelihood of mitigating those impacts; and • some negative effects possible from the lack of a proactive approach to site management/ monitoring (lack of a coordinated effort). 4.4 How was the Consultation Document assessed? We identified a series of questions designed to focus the assessment on those aspects of the Plan that will potentially lead to significant environmental effects. These questions were formulated through consideration of the environmental parameters that have been scoped into the assessment and the existing environmental baseline. In developing the questions we have sought to ensure that they are able to identify potential for maximising positive impacts as well as identifying negative impacts and opportunities for mitigation. 53
- Page 5: CONTENTS chapter one Introduction 3
- Page 8 and 9: chapter two Requirement for a Manag
- Page 10 and 11: chapter four Consultation Process 4
- Page 12 and 13: chapter six Handling your response
- Page 14 and 15: chapter seven in the future, form a
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter eight Managing the World He
- Page 19 and 20: managing the World Heritage Site ar
- Page 21 and 22: managing the World Heritage Site Qu
- Page 23: Grass management to reveal Duntoche
- Page 26 and 27: chapter nine 9.18 The Antonine Wall
- Page 28 and 29: chapter ten objectives will form th
- Page 30 and 31: chapter ten managing both cultural
- Page 32 and 33: chapter ten In East Dunbartonshire,
- Page 34 and 35: chapter ten English. Falkirk Counci
- Page 36 and 37: chapter ten future development of t
- Page 38 and 39: chapter ten Issue Impact of climate
- Page 40 and 41: APpendix a Statement of Outstanding
- Page 42 and 43: appendix b Jones R H. & Thiel A. (2
- Page 44 and 45: appendix c opportunity to contribut
- Page 46 and 47: appendix c • Signage and improved
- Page 48 and 49: APpendix D Strategic Environmental
- Page 50 and 51: appendix D 1.4 Assessment of the en
- Page 52 and 53: appendix D 2.3 The Strategic Enviro
- Page 54 and 55: appendix D 3.2 Environmental Baseli
- Page 58 and 59: appendix D Table 4: Assessment Ques
- Page 60 and 61: appendix D nature. Matrix 4 in Anne
- Page 62 and 63: appendix D Matrix 2: Assessment of
- Page 64 and 65: appendix D Matrix 3: Assessment of
- Page 66 and 67: appendix D Issue: A conservation fr
- Page 68 and 69: appendix D AIM 2: PROMOTE AWARENESS
- Page 70 and 71: appendix D Issue: Marketing, Touris
- Page 72 and 73: appendix D Issue: Strengthening use
- Page 74 and 75: appendix D AIM 5: BALANCE WIDER ENV
- Page 76 and 77: appendix D AIM 6: INCREASE RESEARCH
- Page 78 and 79: appendix D Matrix 4: Assessment of
- Page 80 and 81: appendix D SEA Parameter Summary of
- Page 82 and 83: appendix D Designated Sites within
- Page 84 and 85: appendix D Figure 2: The Antonine W
- Page 86 and 87: appendix D The Antonine Wall runs t
- Page 88 and 89: appendix D The main bodies of water
- Page 90 and 91: appendix D Material Assets (Energy)
- Page 92 and 93: appendix D The canal is also import
- Page 94 and 95: APpendix E Respondent Information F
- Page 96 and 97: appendix E Q11 Do you agree with th
- Page 98 and 99: APpendix G GOVERNANCE MODEL FOR THE
- Page 100 and 101: appendix H German Limes (Obergerman
- Page 102 and 103: appendix H sets out a long-term str
Strategic Environmental Assessment: Environmental Report<br />
4.3 Evolution of the environment in the<br />
absence of the <strong>Plan</strong><br />
If the <strong>Plan</strong> were not developed, it is considered that<br />
the likely future changes to the area could include:<br />
• fewer people would enjoy, understand and<br />
value the cultural and natural heritage of the<br />
<strong>Antonine</strong> <strong>Wall</strong> WHS and its landscape;<br />
• continuing risk of negative impacts on cultural<br />
and natural heritage through land management<br />
actions;<br />
• more conflicts between cultural heritage and<br />
natural heritage through land management<br />
actions;<br />
• less understanding of the impacts of climate<br />
change on the <strong>Antonine</strong> <strong>Wall</strong> WHS and its<br />
landscape, and consequently less likelihood<br />
of mitigating those impacts; and<br />
• some negative effects possible from the lack<br />
of a proactive approach to site management/<br />
monitoring (lack of a coordinated effort).<br />
4.4 How was the Consultation Document<br />
assessed?<br />
We identified a series of questions designed to focus<br />
the assessment on those aspects of the <strong>Plan</strong> that<br />
will potentially lead to significant environmental<br />
effects. <strong>The</strong>se questions were formulated through<br />
consideration of the environmental parameters<br />
that have been scoped into the assessment and the<br />
existing environmental baseline. In developing the<br />
questions we have sought to ensure that they are<br />
able to identify potential for maximising positive<br />
impacts as well as identifying negative impacts and<br />
opportunities for mitigation.<br />
53