12.01.2014 Views

The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council

The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council

The Antonine Wall Management Plan 2013-18 - Glasgow City Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter eight<br />

Managing the World<br />

Heritage Site<br />

8.1 This section sets out the roles and responsibilities<br />

of those involved in the management of the<br />

<strong>Antonine</strong> <strong>Wall</strong> WHS including the UK and<br />

Scottish Governments, the Partners who take<br />

an active role in day-to-day management, and<br />

the diverse range of stakeholders who have an<br />

interest in the Site. A governance model for the<br />

<strong>Antonine</strong> <strong>Wall</strong> is available at Appendix G.<br />

8.2 <strong>The</strong> process of developing a <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

involves bringing together all key Partners and<br />

stakeholders to agree a common vision for the<br />

future of the Site. <strong>The</strong> implementation of the<br />

<strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> then relies on the effective<br />

co-operation and commitment of Partners and<br />

other key stakeholders to take actions forward.<br />

8.3 All management roles are delivered within<br />

a clear management structure and context,<br />

defined internationally by UNESCO and refined<br />

at local level.<br />

State Party<br />

8.4 State Parties are countries which have ratified<br />

the UNESCO World Heritage Convention. Since<br />

International Treaties are reserved under the<br />

Scotland Act 1998 the UK government is State<br />

Party to the Convention. <strong>The</strong> Department of<br />

Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) is responsible<br />

for the UK’s overall policy on World Heritage<br />

Sites but since management of the historic<br />

environment is devolved, Scottish Ministers<br />

are responsible for selecting Scottish sites for<br />

nomination, for ensuring that World Heritage<br />

Sites in Scotland are well managed, and that<br />

the Outstanding Universal Value of each Site<br />

is protected. In Scotland, Historic Scotland<br />

undertakes that role on their behalf.<br />

FREWHS International Partners<br />

8.5 As a serial transnational World Heritage Site,<br />

the FREWHS presently includes Partners in<br />

Scotland, England and Germany. <strong>The</strong> number<br />

of international Partners could grow further<br />

in the future as other countries with sections<br />

of the second century Roman frontier submit<br />

nomination bids to UNESCO. Co-ordination<br />

and delivery of this complicated international<br />

management arrangement is undertaken at<br />

several levels within the partnership, from<br />

strategic to operational.<br />

8.6 At a strategic level, the Inter Governmental<br />

Committee (IGC) meets annually and consists<br />

of delegations of the State Parties from the<br />

countries already inscribed. Delegations include<br />

at least one member of the administration in<br />

charge of the national section(s) of the FREWHS<br />

as well as at least one archaeological expert. <strong>The</strong><br />

rules and function of the IGC are approved and<br />

accepted by all the participating State Parties<br />

in the FREWHS, and the IGC is responsible for<br />

the co-ordination of the joint international<br />

management of the FREWHS and for maintaining<br />

compliance with WHC obligations. Delegations<br />

of State Parties caring for a section of the Roman<br />

frontier not yet inscribed are welcomed as<br />

observers, particularly if considering nomination,<br />

or already on the tentative list.<br />

8.7 At an academic level, a panel of international<br />

experts (the Bratislava Group) meets annually,<br />

and advises the FREWHS IGC on all cultural<br />

heritage management issues. This group forms<br />

a key link for passing on ‘lessons learned’ from<br />

inscribed sections to those on the tentative list<br />

or considering nomination.<br />

8.8 At an operational level, co-ordinators and Site<br />

managers (the Hexham Group) meet at least once<br />

a year, usually more often, to discuss monitoring<br />

issues and share best practice approaches to Site<br />

management and presentation.<br />

LEFT: Watling Lodge<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!