Construal operations in semantic change: the case of abstract nouns
Construal operations in semantic change: the case of abstract nouns
Construal operations in semantic change: the case of abstract nouns
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F4: “argument, debate, dispute” (18 th –19 th century), exemplified by:<br />
(21) Det är bekant, hvad fråga varit emellan Philosophiska Sedelärare, om<br />
en enda pr<strong>in</strong>cip för Sedeläran (SAOB)<br />
it is known what dispute been between philosophical moral.philosophers,<br />
about one s<strong>in</strong>gle pr<strong>in</strong>ciple for moral.philosophy.<strong>the</strong><br />
It is known what dispute has been between philosophical moral philosophers,<br />
about one s<strong>in</strong>gle pr<strong>in</strong>ciple for <strong>the</strong> moral philosophy<br />
Mean<strong>in</strong>g derivation: F3 > F4, as a result <strong>of</strong> pragmatic <strong>in</strong>ference. The motivation<br />
for this assumption is that “discussion” <strong>of</strong>ten implies “disagreement”.<br />
F5: “doubt”, exemplified by:<br />
(22) Frågan är om fäst<strong>in</strong>gar verkligen orsakar hjärnh<strong>in</strong>ne<strong>in</strong>flammation.<br />
question.<strong>the</strong> is whe<strong>the</strong>r ticks really cause men<strong>in</strong>gitis<br />
The question is whe<strong>the</strong>r ticks really cause men<strong>in</strong>gitis.<br />
Mean<strong>in</strong>g derivation: F > F5 as a result <strong>of</strong> selection <strong>of</strong> elements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> base<br />
STATE OF AFFAIRS, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with pragmatic <strong>in</strong>ference. The reason<strong>in</strong>g goes as<br />
follows: it is likely that one may be doubtful about a state <strong>of</strong> affairs <strong>of</strong> which one<br />
is ignorant.<br />
The developmental network <strong>of</strong> fråga is summarized <strong>in</strong> Fig. 10.<br />
F<br />
F1 F3 F5<br />
F2<br />
F4<br />
Fig. 10 . The developmental network <strong>of</strong> fråga ‘question’.<br />
62