Construal operations in semantic change: the case of abstract nouns

Construal operations in semantic change: the case of abstract nouns Construal operations in semantic change: the case of abstract nouns

10.01.2014 Views

intention and purpose. Thus ‘intention’ and ‘purpose’ are linked to both ‘opinion’ and ‘sense’, respectively. Further, the use of mening in (11b) is related to the metaphorical use in (11c) – life is just like a word conceptualized as a container but whereas the content of life is equal to the purpose of life, the content of a word is equal to its sense. Also the meaning ‘sentence’ (11d) – although clearly separated from the variants in (11a–c) – fits well into the base knowledge of the sense ‘opinion’. Sentences are in fact not only the typical means to verbally express an opinion but the way to do it. That is, sentences represent the form side of a linguistic expression used to express an opinion. Interestingly, also Eng. sentence shows an earlier meaning ‘meaning, sense’; ‘opinion’, motivated by its origin in Lat. sententia ‘mental feeling, opinion’ (ODEE: 809). Together all these meaning variants – ‘sense’, ‘intention’, ‘purpose’ and ‘sentence’ – are parts of the base, referred to as COMMUNICATION in Fig. 5, along with other semantic aspects which are not lexically realized. The interconnections between the various elements in the base are illustrated in Fig. 6 below. Lexically realized meanings are given within single quotation marks. Profile: Mening ‘opinion’ Base: [linguistic expression] [symbolic unit] [functional unit] [form] [meaning] ‘intention’ ‘purpose’ ‘sentence’ ‘sense’ Fig. 6. Overview of the interconnections in the base of Sw. mening ‘opinion’. In each of the uses in (11) above only one of the elements in the base is focused – i.e. has entered the profile – whereas the others are backgrounded. 56

2.3. Uppgift ‘information’ The noun uppgift has two well-entrenched meanings, namely ‘information’ vs. ‘task’. The meaning ‘information’ can be paraphrased as “a message containing a statement”, showing that uppgift is viewed as a container (cf. 2.2.). In addition, the verbal message per se is conceptualized as a bounded object, which can be given (12a), received (12b), and possessed (12c). (12) a. uppgift skall lämnas om hur många dagar…. information shall leave.PASS about how many days… information should be left about how many days… b. att han fått uppgiften om yxhugget that he got information.the about cut.of.axe.the that he got the information about the cut of the axe c. Har du några uppgifter på det? have you any information.PLUR on that Have you any information about that? The range of uses of uppgift supports the idea that verbal messages are conceived of in terms of the conduit metaphor, shown in the examples below where “the content” of uppgift is underlined. (13) a. Framställningen bör innehålla uppgift om övriga omständigheter. report.the ought to.contain information about other circumstances The report ought to contain information about other circumstances. b. att uppgiften skall avse näringsidkarens registrerade firma that information.the shall concern manufacturer.the.GEN registered firm that the information should concern the manufacturer’s registered firm In some uses, however, only the content is focused – disregarding the embracing verbal form. For instance, this is the case when uppgift is combined with the verb stämma ‘to be correct’: (14) Stämmer uppgiften? is.correct information.the Is the information correct? 57

<strong>in</strong>tention and purpose. Thus ‘<strong>in</strong>tention’ and ‘purpose’ are l<strong>in</strong>ked to both<br />

‘op<strong>in</strong>ion’ and ‘sense’, respectively. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> men<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> (11b) is related<br />

to <strong>the</strong> metaphorical use <strong>in</strong> (11c) – life is just like a word conceptualized as a<br />

conta<strong>in</strong>er but whereas <strong>the</strong> content <strong>of</strong> life is equal to <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>the</strong><br />

content <strong>of</strong> a word is equal to its sense.<br />

Also <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g ‘sentence’ (11d) – although clearly separated from <strong>the</strong><br />

variants <strong>in</strong> (11a–c) – fits well <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> base knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense ‘op<strong>in</strong>ion’.<br />

Sentences are <strong>in</strong> fact not only <strong>the</strong> typical means to verbally express an op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

but <strong>the</strong> way to do it. That is, sentences represent <strong>the</strong> form side <strong>of</strong> a l<strong>in</strong>guistic<br />

expression used to express an op<strong>in</strong>ion. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, also Eng. sentence shows<br />

an earlier mean<strong>in</strong>g ‘mean<strong>in</strong>g, sense’; ‘op<strong>in</strong>ion’, motivated by its orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Lat.<br />

sententia ‘mental feel<strong>in</strong>g, op<strong>in</strong>ion’ (ODEE: 809).<br />

Toge<strong>the</strong>r all <strong>the</strong>se mean<strong>in</strong>g variants – ‘sense’, ‘<strong>in</strong>tention’, ‘purpose’ and<br />

‘sentence’ – are parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> base, referred to as COMMUNICATION <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5,<br />

along with o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>semantic</strong> aspects which are not lexically realized. The <strong>in</strong>terconnections<br />

between <strong>the</strong> various elements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> base are illustrated <strong>in</strong> Fig. 6<br />

below. Lexically realized mean<strong>in</strong>gs are given with<strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle quotation marks.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>ile:<br />

Men<strong>in</strong>g ‘op<strong>in</strong>ion’<br />

Base:<br />

[l<strong>in</strong>guistic expression]<br />

[symbolic unit]<br />

[functional unit]<br />

[form] [mean<strong>in</strong>g] ‘<strong>in</strong>tention’ ‘purpose’<br />

‘sentence’<br />

‘sense’<br />

Fig. 6. Overview <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terconnections <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> Sw. men<strong>in</strong>g ‘op<strong>in</strong>ion’.<br />

In each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uses <strong>in</strong> (11) above only one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> elements <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> base is focused<br />

– i.e. has entered <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile – whereas <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs are backgrounded.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!