10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It is difficult to identify stone-working areas at settlements as evidence for this craft is rarely<br />

found. At Inishkea North, there was evidence for the working of lumps of chlorite inside a<br />

timber structure (also used for dye-production) to the northwest of an early monastery, not<br />

far from an area of metalworking (Henry 1952, 172; Comber 2008, 62, 64). Comber (2008,<br />

64) has noted that stone-working was a noisy activity and may have been undertaken away<br />

from the domestic area for this reason. Approximately 30 stone motif-pieces were recovered<br />

from a rectangular building termed the ‘school’ on the southwest side of the middle enclosure<br />

at Nendrum (Lawlor 1925, 143-4; Bourke 2007, 409, 420). At Cahercommaun, 50 of the 53<br />

fragments of lignite rings and lignite discs were identified in the northwest quadrant; the<br />

same area which contained the largest quantity of domestic objects, tools and weapons while<br />

the primary ironworking evidence was found in the southeast area and the highest<br />

concentration of querns in the southwest of the site (Hencken 1938, 67-9).<br />

Very few sites have produced evidence for actual stone-working and therefore it is difficult to<br />

identify different levels of craft activity (Comber 2008, 65-7). <strong>The</strong> occupants of all settlements<br />

probably had the technical ability to produce a range of simple domestic stone tools and<br />

implements such as whetstones. Evidence for the production of semi-luxury lignite or jet<br />

bracelets have been found at fewer sites and it appears that many sites such as<br />

Cahercommaun may have been exporting these objects and may represent internal trading<br />

centres (Comber 2008, 159). <strong>The</strong> sheer number of quernstones from Moynagh Lough (e.g.<br />

Bradley 1982/83, 28), Lagore (43 quern fragments) (Hencken 1950, 173-5), Cahercommaun<br />

(37 fragments) (Hencken 1938, 59-60) and the nearby cashels at Carraig Aille I (12<br />

fragments) and II (41 fragments) (Ó Ríordáin 1949a, 83-6, 94, 100) may indicate that these<br />

items were exported from these sites. Lawlor (1925, 18) also reported ‘a great many<br />

fragments of querns’ at Nendrum but only one of these is now identifiable (Bourke 1997, 416,<br />

421). Evidence for ‘specialist’ stone-working is primarily found on higher status sites,<br />

particularly monasteries, where groups of highly skilled master masons and apprentices were<br />

undoubtedly responsible for the manufacture and construction of highly sophisticated and<br />

elaborate stone crosses, grave-slabs and buildings.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!