10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1995, 36). A collection of walrus ivory pins (including the butchered skull of a walrus) at<br />

Essex Street West/Lower Exchange Street (Simpson 1999, 26) and walrus skull fragments at<br />

Fishamble Street (Wallace 1987, 216) may indicate ivory-working in Scandinavian Dublin and<br />

a piece of walrus ivory decorated on its outer surface by a series of incised concentric circles<br />

and a central perforation was found at Cloghermore Cave (Connolly and Coyne 2005, 189). At<br />

Inishkea North, the shoulder blade of a whale was found outside the door of a structure<br />

(House C, Site 2) and bore numerous cut-marks suggesting its use as a chopping block<br />

(Henry 1945, 136). A roughly oval whalebone disc with perforations was found in a nearby<br />

structure (House A, Site 2) and two cut-ribs of whale were identified on either side of the<br />

door of another structure (House A, Site, 3) (Henry 1952). A whalebone sword handle was<br />

found at Collierstown (O’Hara 2009), a whalebone plaque was also recovered from the rural<br />

Viking site at Cherrywood (Ó Néill 2006). A perforated whale tooth was also found at Knowth<br />

Site M and at Lough Faughan Crannóg (Stout & Stout 2008, 64, Collins 1955); and part of the<br />

vertebra of a whale was recorded at Downpatrick where it found a final use as a slab in an<br />

early medieval pavement (Brannon 1988, 63).<br />

5.4: Contexts of bone-, antler- and horn-working<br />

As bone and antler are organic materials, Comber (2008, 94) has noted that it is difficult to<br />

identify craft-working areas due to the relatively few known workshops or concentrations of<br />

working debris (unfinished artefacts and waste) within early medieval settlements. She has<br />

suggested that bone- or antler-working was not undertaken on a large-scale nor confined to<br />

any particular designated areas within a settlement (ibid.). Much of the evidence for boneand<br />

antler-working (waste and unfinished objects) was found within enclosure ditches at<br />

Clonfad, Armagh and Roestown and Scandinavian Waterford or disposed in a well close to a<br />

workshop area to the east of the monastic buildings at Clonmacnoise. At Raystown the<br />

working of pig fibulae for needles largely took place in one area to the north of the cemetery<br />

close to a number of souterrains while a cache of bone blanks was dumped in a disused<br />

millrace distant from the main settlement (Seaver 2010, 35-36). Likewise sawn antler tines<br />

were dumped within deposits in a disused mill race as was the case at the mill at Killoteran<br />

(ibid, 36, Owen 2008, 75). <strong>The</strong> incomplete and finished bone and antler pins and composite<br />

combs at Illaunloughan were recovered from a midden outside a hut (D) on the southwestern<br />

side of the small island away from the ecclesiastical structures (Marshall and Walsh 2005,<br />

149-51, 186-7). <strong>The</strong>re is evidence that particular buildings and areas along streets in<br />

Scandinavian Dublin (High Street & Christchurch Place) and Waterford (Peter Street) were<br />

specialising in bone-working. <strong>The</strong>se buildings in the latter site were close to the ramparts on<br />

the periphery of the city and it appears that large quantities of antler and bone waste from<br />

the habitation deposits may have been dumped within and outside the nearby enclosing<br />

fosses (Hurley 1997e, 653). Comber (2008, 94) has suggested that the bone and antler may<br />

have been retrieved from butchery areas or midden heaps within settlements but the actual<br />

final working and completion of the bone or antler artefacts may have been undertaken away<br />

from these unpleasant places. At Cahercommaun, Hencken (1938, 67-9) noted that most of<br />

the evidence for comb-working and a range of bone and antler artefacts (spindle-whorls,<br />

spear-heads, pins, points) were found in the northeast quadrant in ‘the part of the fort<br />

occupied by its owners’ though most worked fragment of bone and antler and the primary<br />

ironworking features were found in the southwest quadrant area described by the excavator<br />

as ‘a poor area’.<br />

5.5: Levels of bone-, antler- and horn-working<br />

Evidence for bone and antler working has been found across a range of sites both<br />

ecclesiastical and secular (Comber 2008, 95). With the exception of comb-making, boneworking<br />

does not appear to have been a specialist activity requiring much expertise and<br />

many people may have had the capacity to produce artefacts such as pig-fibula pins, beads<br />

and needles on a subsistence basis. Quantifying how much of a craft this represents at any<br />

one time is difficult as many of the sites have different periods of occupation. Likewise while<br />

many bone objects were made on side others were clearly imported for example a bone<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!