EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1995, 36). A collection of walrus ivory pins (including the butchered skull of a walrus) at<br />
Essex Street West/Lower Exchange Street (Simpson 1999, 26) and walrus skull fragments at<br />
Fishamble Street (Wallace 1987, 216) may indicate ivory-working in Scandinavian Dublin and<br />
a piece of walrus ivory decorated on its outer surface by a series of incised concentric circles<br />
and a central perforation was found at Cloghermore Cave (Connolly and Coyne 2005, 189). At<br />
Inishkea North, the shoulder blade of a whale was found outside the door of a structure<br />
(House C, Site 2) and bore numerous cut-marks suggesting its use as a chopping block<br />
(Henry 1945, 136). A roughly oval whalebone disc with perforations was found in a nearby<br />
structure (House A, Site 2) and two cut-ribs of whale were identified on either side of the<br />
door of another structure (House A, Site, 3) (Henry 1952). A whalebone sword handle was<br />
found at Collierstown (O’Hara 2009), a whalebone plaque was also recovered from the rural<br />
Viking site at Cherrywood (Ó Néill 2006). A perforated whale tooth was also found at Knowth<br />
Site M and at Lough Faughan Crannóg (Stout & Stout 2008, 64, Collins 1955); and part of the<br />
vertebra of a whale was recorded at Downpatrick where it found a final use as a slab in an<br />
early medieval pavement (Brannon 1988, 63).<br />
5.4: Contexts of bone-, antler- and horn-working<br />
As bone and antler are organic materials, Comber (2008, 94) has noted that it is difficult to<br />
identify craft-working areas due to the relatively few known workshops or concentrations of<br />
working debris (unfinished artefacts and waste) within early medieval settlements. She has<br />
suggested that bone- or antler-working was not undertaken on a large-scale nor confined to<br />
any particular designated areas within a settlement (ibid.). Much of the evidence for boneand<br />
antler-working (waste and unfinished objects) was found within enclosure ditches at<br />
Clonfad, Armagh and Roestown and Scandinavian Waterford or disposed in a well close to a<br />
workshop area to the east of the monastic buildings at Clonmacnoise. At Raystown the<br />
working of pig fibulae for needles largely took place in one area to the north of the cemetery<br />
close to a number of souterrains while a cache of bone blanks was dumped in a disused<br />
millrace distant from the main settlement (Seaver 2010, 35-36). Likewise sawn antler tines<br />
were dumped within deposits in a disused mill race as was the case at the mill at Killoteran<br />
(ibid, 36, Owen 2008, 75). <strong>The</strong> incomplete and finished bone and antler pins and composite<br />
combs at Illaunloughan were recovered from a midden outside a hut (D) on the southwestern<br />
side of the small island away from the ecclesiastical structures (Marshall and Walsh 2005,<br />
149-51, 186-7). <strong>The</strong>re is evidence that particular buildings and areas along streets in<br />
Scandinavian Dublin (High Street & Christchurch Place) and Waterford (Peter Street) were<br />
specialising in bone-working. <strong>The</strong>se buildings in the latter site were close to the ramparts on<br />
the periphery of the city and it appears that large quantities of antler and bone waste from<br />
the habitation deposits may have been dumped within and outside the nearby enclosing<br />
fosses (Hurley 1997e, 653). Comber (2008, 94) has suggested that the bone and antler may<br />
have been retrieved from butchery areas or midden heaps within settlements but the actual<br />
final working and completion of the bone or antler artefacts may have been undertaken away<br />
from these unpleasant places. At Cahercommaun, Hencken (1938, 67-9) noted that most of<br />
the evidence for comb-working and a range of bone and antler artefacts (spindle-whorls,<br />
spear-heads, pins, points) were found in the northeast quadrant in ‘the part of the fort<br />
occupied by its owners’ though most worked fragment of bone and antler and the primary<br />
ironworking features were found in the southwest quadrant area described by the excavator<br />
as ‘a poor area’.<br />
5.5: Levels of bone-, antler- and horn-working<br />
Evidence for bone and antler working has been found across a range of sites both<br />
ecclesiastical and secular (Comber 2008, 95). With the exception of comb-making, boneworking<br />
does not appear to have been a specialist activity requiring much expertise and<br />
many people may have had the capacity to produce artefacts such as pig-fibula pins, beads<br />
and needles on a subsistence basis. Quantifying how much of a craft this represents at any<br />
one time is difficult as many of the sites have different periods of occupation. Likewise while<br />
many bone objects were made on side others were clearly imported for example a bone<br />
63