EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
a matrix for casting Thor’s hammer symbols (Ó Ríordáin 1984, 137). Other stone ingot<br />
moulds are known from various sites, including Lagore (Hencken 1950, 170-1); Moynagh<br />
Lough (Craddock 1990, 182); Ballinderry II (Hencken 1942, 65); Garranes (Ó Ríordáin 1942,<br />
108-9); Roestown (O'Hara 2009b, 62); Clonmacnoise (King 2009, 343); Cathedral Hill,<br />
Armagh (Gaskell-Brown & Harper 1984, 125); Clonfad (Stevens 2007, 43; 2010, 91) and<br />
Temple Bar West, Scandinavian Dublin (Simpson 1999, 33), Faughart Lower, County Louth<br />
(Schuster & Jones <strong>2012</strong>, 46-47). A stone mould for dress-pins was recorded at Caherconnell<br />
cashel (Hull and Comber 2008, 31); a possible stone mould for casting small rings was found<br />
at Reask (Fanning 1981, 126) while another possible example for pewter bowls was found at<br />
Woodstown 6 (O'Brien & Russell 2005, 119).<br />
Clay moulds were used for producing finer objects such as ringed-pins and penannular<br />
brooches (Doyle infra, Section 3). It appears that only bivalve or ‘two-piece’ clay moulds were<br />
used to produce these (Comber 2008, 141). However, most of these are in a fragmentary<br />
state as they were usually broken in order to extract the casting. Once the cast objects were<br />
removed from their moulds, they were finished by filing away the rough edges and polishing.<br />
<strong>The</strong>y were then ready for assembly and for further decoration such as millefiori, enamel or<br />
the insertion of glass or amber studs (Edwards 1990, 91). Clay moulds associated with metalworking<br />
activity are known from at least 15 settlements and nine ecclesiastical sites<br />
(Appendix 1; O'Connor 2005). <strong>The</strong>y are highly friable and therefore easily broken, a factor<br />
which may contribute to their discovery and distribution. Most of the settlement sites are<br />
represented by very small numbers of moulds (less than eight). <strong>The</strong>se are predominantly<br />
high status raths, crannogs and ecclesiastical sites or settlements with burials (Fig. 3.2).<br />
Fig. 3.2: Moulds on different types of Irish early medieval settlements (N=22)<br />
47