EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
working furnace at Rathgurreen and was identified as having a similar function (Comber<br />
2008, 118). Other possible stone anvils have been recorded at seven other sites in the <strong>EMAP</strong><br />
<strong>2012</strong> gazetteer as well as in a recent excavation at Dunlo (Young 2010). <strong>The</strong> most signficant<br />
example from Lowpark had a bowl shaped depression on one side and a small circular<br />
depression which in turn contained a square socket on the other which is likely to be for an<br />
iron anvil (Higgins 2010, 3-4). It is possible that large flat stones were generally utilised as<br />
anvils in this period and many of these have probably been overlooked during excavations<br />
(Comber 2008, 118). Possible iron equivalents have also been noted at Cloghermore cave<br />
(Connolly & Coyne 2005, 217); the crannógs at Ballinderry II (Hencken 1942), Randalstown<br />
(Wood-Martin 1886, 168); Garryduff I (O'Kelly 1963, 56–7), and the ecclesiastical site at<br />
Kiltera (Macalister 1935, 5). <strong>The</strong> most recently found iron anvil was located in the chamber of<br />
a souterrain at Kilree where deposits were dated to A.D. 692-772 (Coughlan 2010, 17) <strong>The</strong><br />
evidence for a cemented smithing pan that formed on the floor surrounding the hearth and<br />
anvil from the trampling of iron residues into the ground by the smith and his assistants can<br />
also indicate the presence of an iron smithing workshop (Carlin 2008, 110). Such evidence<br />
was discovered at Lagore (Hencken 1950, 233) and Garranes where a dense black<br />
metallurgical layer was found associated with a scatter of post-holes and a stone setting (Ó<br />
Ríordáin 1942, 86–7).<br />
2.5: Contexts of iron-working<br />
Aside from mining and charcoal-production, the four separate processes involved in ironworking<br />
were ore processing (roasting), smelting, bloomsmithing and forging. <strong>The</strong> dynamics<br />
and settlement context of these processes are still poorly understood. It has been suggested<br />
that primary iron production took place in peripheral locations close to woodland and fuel and<br />
timber sources (Carlin 2008, 108). <strong>The</strong>re are now frequent isolated sites where metallurgical<br />
residues suggest smelting and bloomsmithing such as those in County Meath on the M4 (see<br />
smelting above for examples). Other linear schemes have revealed many more such sites<br />
Aghamore (Byrne 2007, 333-4), Dollas Lower (Dowling and Taylor 2007, 273-4), Kiltenan<br />
south (Dennehy 2007, 291) and Ennisnag (Jennings, 2008). Some of these are located close<br />
to woodland and bog with several including charcoal making pits. More recently examples<br />
have been excavated at Dunlo, County Galway and Ballinglanna north and Cloonafinneela<br />
both in County Kerry (Young 2010, 2011a, <strong>2012</strong>, 2). <strong>The</strong>se may represent specialised<br />
bloomsmithing and/or smelting sites. <strong>The</strong> apparent absence of secondary smithing i.e the<br />
forging/blacksmithing of objects was contrasted with evidence from settlements like Clonfad<br />
which was primarily engaged in bloomsmithing and artefact production.<br />
It could be suggested that these ‘isolated’ industrial features may represent evidence for<br />
‘itinerant’ ironworkers (Comber 2008, 124). However, Carlin (2008, 107) has suggested<br />
instead that they were more the product of local farmer-ironsmiths, exploiting their<br />
surrounding natural resources, probably on a seasonal basis. Although they are mentioned in<br />
the story Cath Maige Tuired itinerant smiths appear to be a rarity in many small scale<br />
societies (Hall 2011, 313). It could also be the case that these represented places where<br />
specialised ironworkers produced bloom for use in larger workshops at settlement sites.<br />
<strong>The</strong> crannog at Bofeenaun could be regarded as an ‘isolated’ specialised iron-working site<br />
(O'Sullivan 1998, 122) as it produced evidence primarily for the processing and smelting of<br />
iron ore. Two iron-smelting furnaces, furnace lining fragments and a large volume of slag<br />
were recovered and the only finds consisted of two crushing stones or stone mortars (for the<br />
ore), a saddle quern, a hammer stone, an iron spade and two gouge-type tools (Lawless<br />
1992, 14-21).<strong>The</strong>re was no structural or occupational evidence, except for a revetment<br />
palisade and an area of stone paving (ibid.). Bofeenaun was located in an apparently<br />
marginal landscape and it has been suggested that ‘crannogs like Bofeenaun should be<br />
interpreted as the island workshops of blacksmiths, seen as semi-mythical personages in<br />
early medieval mythology on the edge of society’ (O'Sullivan and Van de Noort 2007, 74)<br />
which were visited periodically by local farmers to meet their subsistence needs.<br />
34