10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

knife or other blade – and the ubiquity of the raw material on most sites. This in turn may<br />

limit the potential to find evidence of their manufacture; carving a small piece of bone into a<br />

pin would be a mobile craft, not necessarily one restricted to a particular structure or area,<br />

and hence evidence might be dispersed and difficult to find and identify in excavations. This<br />

may explain the reliance on indirect evidence (bone ornaments and other finished bone items<br />

such as spindle whorls or combs) to suggest bone-working on the sites surveyed. If this does<br />

imply an unspecialised craft, it is interesting that some high-status sites, such as Lagore and<br />

Knowth, are included amongst the sites indicating bone-working (although the latter does<br />

have more direct evidence). Overall, direct evidence for bone-working is rarer, including<br />

unfinished bone pins at Moyne, as well as examples of worked and unworked, polished or cut<br />

bones (see Table 8.11).<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!