10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pins<br />

Pins have been called ‘the universal metal dress-fastener’ of early medieval Ireland, and were<br />

probably used as such by most of the population (Youngs 1989, 22; Edwards 1990, 141).<br />

Many different types are known, several of which overlap chronologically; some types dating<br />

back into the Iron Age, including Omega pins, ibex-headed pins and projecting ring-headed<br />

pins, also occur occasionally on early medieval sites. <strong>The</strong> vast majority of pins, however, fall<br />

into two main categories of ring-headed pins and stick pins. Pins are generally less decorative<br />

than brooches, being smaller in surface area, but may yet display high-quality workmanship<br />

and skilled craft in their making. A broader range of material is used in pins than for brooches<br />

– not only the various metals, but also significant quantities of bone/antler and, in a few<br />

cases, wood (the scarcity of which may be linked to preservation conditions).<br />

Pins were found on 152 of the 216 sites which produced personal ornaments. Of these, 63<br />

sites produced just a single pin; 66 had between two and ten pins; and 23 had more than ten<br />

pins (see Table 7.4). Distribution across difference site types is indicated in Fig. 7.4.<br />

Site Total Copper alloy Iron Bone/antler Wood Other<br />

Dowdstown 11 5 3 3<br />

Killickaweeny 11 1 6 4<br />

Carraig Aille I 13 5 5 3<br />

Uisneach 14 4 9 1<br />

Cloghermore 15 6 1 8<br />

Parknahown<br />

At least 13 1 Plural<br />

16<br />

Newtownlow 20 20<br />

Rathmullan Lower 21 3 1 17<br />

Moynagh Lough 23 7 4 12<br />

Rathtinaun<br />

At least 9+ 2 12+ 3+<br />

26<br />

Ballinderry II 27 10 1 9 7<br />

Ballinderry I 28 17 2 6 3<br />

Raystown 29 11 12 6<br />

Garryduff<br />

At least 15 20 Plural<br />

37<br />

Deer Park Farms 62 5 14 36 7<br />

Roestown 2<br />

At least 32 8 27+<br />

67<br />

Feltrim Hill<br />

At least<br />

73<br />

Plural 23 48<br />

Castlefarm 81 27 15 17 22 iron-&-<br />

copper alloy<br />

Carraig Aille II 89 19 31 39<br />

Cahercommaun 98 5 11 82<br />

Dooey c. 100 c. 50 plural plural<br />

Lagore 221 31 12 164 13 1 silver<br />

Knowth 223 145 25 51 2 leaded<br />

gunmetal<br />

Table 7.4: Sites with more than ten pins, with materials<br />

Copper alloy was the most widely represented material for pins: 128 sites had copper alloy<br />

pins, either alone or with other materials, and of these, 66 had copper alloy pins only. A total<br />

of 63 sites produced iron pins; nine of these had only iron pins, the rest had other materials<br />

also. Fifty-four sites produced bone pins, of which just seven had bone pins only (Boho,<br />

Castleskreen, Dunbell Big 6, Moathill 1, Owenbristy, Park North and Ratoath; of these only<br />

Boho has no other ornaments). Just one site (Lagore) produced a silver pin. No site produced<br />

only wooden pins, but a small number (five) had wooden examples among their pin<br />

assemblages. Four of these were crannogs – Ballinderry I, Ballinderry II, Lagore and<br />

Rathtinaun – and the fifth a waterlogged raised rath (Deer Park Farms), so preservation<br />

conditions may be a key element here, although it does not explain their absence from other<br />

crannogs. Twenty-four sites had pins of three different materials, namely copper alloy, iron<br />

and bone; these were Cahercommaun, Carraig Aille I, Carraig Aille II, Castlefarm,<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!