10.01.2014 Views

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

EMAP_2012_Report_6_1.pdf (7.3 MB) - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

perhaps adopted only by a minority (although further examination of distribution and<br />

chronology would be needed to assess this possibility), or may suggest that belts could have<br />

been fastened in other ways.<br />

Ornaments<br />

A broad range of ornaments is known from early medieval Ireland, not all of which come<br />

from excavated contexts or settlement sites. Personal ornaments are by their nature small,<br />

portable objects; as such it might be expected that they could be easily transported, traded<br />

or exchanged over distances. As noted above, only some of these items appear in the literary<br />

or pictorial sources; archaeological evidence provides significant additional information on the<br />

types and details, and potentially how they were used. However, it has also been noted that<br />

the artefactual evidence does not always support the literary descriptions, perhaps because<br />

of the use of specific conventions in the written texts; the precious metals in descriptions of<br />

brooches and pins in the Táin, for example, are in inverse proportion to those found in the<br />

artefactual evidence (Mallory 1986).<br />

<strong>The</strong> distribution of personal ornaments is fairly wide, with examples occurring in 216 of the<br />

317 sites in the gazetteer. <strong>The</strong> absence of personal ornaments from almost one-third of the<br />

total sites surveyed might perhaps reflect the extent of the excavations, or the nature of the<br />

sites; ornaments were found at only seven of 22 souterrain sites, for example, while all of the<br />

cemetery/settlement sites surveyed had some personal ornaments. But all of the site types<br />

are represented among those producing ornaments (see Fig. 7.1 below).<br />

Fig. 7.1: Breakdown of the 216 sites with personal ornaments by site type<br />

<strong>The</strong> contexts of the personal ornaments vary across the sites; for the most part excavated<br />

examples on settlement sites are not directly in contexts which suggest their use – occurring<br />

in ditches or pits, or as unstratified finds. One notable exception is Deer Park Farms, where<br />

several of the ornaments (including a brooch and several beads) were found not only within<br />

the houses, but in some cases in the bedding areas, allowing them to be considered directly<br />

in connection with the inhabitants and their daily lives (Lynn & McDowell 2011, 333). <strong>The</strong><br />

degree of preservation on this site allows such associations to be made, which may not be<br />

apparent in other excavations. Ornaments in burials are rare, but occasional examples may<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!