archaeological & built heritage assessment - The Heritage Council
archaeological & built heritage assessment - The Heritage Council
archaeological & built heritage assessment - The Heritage Council
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
dwelling / earthworks (7) / deer park / souterrain / possible road / crannógs (9) / fulacht fiadh / field<br />
banks (3) / castle / tower / burial ground / nunnery tradition / historic town (Boyle) / possible barrow /<br />
deserted settlement / and a bridge. It is notable that in this area a distinct religious tradition was set up in<br />
the late medieval period in the form of ecclesiastical remains and abbeys etc., mostly on Lough Key itself.<br />
<strong>The</strong> area was also densely populated at this time, especially within the portion of Rockingham since the<br />
majority of enclosures are located there as well as crannógs on the shores of the lough.<br />
Area 4<br />
Area 4 has been defined as that from Carrick-on-Shannon to Roosky, including Jamestown, Drumsna, Mohill and<br />
Dromod (Jamestown bridge, Jamestown canal, Drumsna bridge, Albert lock, railway bridge, Dromod harbour,<br />
Roosky lock, Roosky bridge)<br />
<strong>The</strong> bridge at Carrick-on-Shannon had been erected in 1718 to replace an earlier one; the local landlord,<br />
Sir George St George, had enjoyed the toll rights on the first bridge in return for keeping it in repair and<br />
he was probably also involved in the construction of the eighteenth century bridge (Delaney 1987). John<br />
Brownrigg, who later became the engineer to the Directors General of Inland Navigation, surveyed the<br />
river in the 1790s and remarked: ‘A Boat of Burden cannot in summer pass the Bridge of Carrick’ (ibid.). He<br />
said that the fifth arch from the west side was the best for navigation but it was only 28ft 6in wide with<br />
about half the headroom of the present bridge. <strong>The</strong>se comments suggest that some boats were using the<br />
river north of Carrick-on-Shannon even though navigation works had not been extended above the town.<br />
Upstream of the bridge a harbour had been excavated in 1829 on land donated by the St Georges and this<br />
was approached by a narrow channel.<br />
In the 1830s, when Rhodes was surveying the river for the Shannon Commission, Carrick-on-Shannon<br />
was a town of some 2000 inhabitants. <strong>The</strong> commissioners decided to replace the old bridge and it was<br />
blown up in 1845. <strong>The</strong> original plans envisaged an opening arch in the new bridge however no opening<br />
spans were made upstream of the Jamestown Canal because of financial constraints (ibid.). Despite this,<br />
quay walls were <strong>built</strong> and the old harbour above the bridge was enlarged.<br />
<strong>The</strong> railway line follows the river closely from Carrick-on-Shannon to Lough Bofin crossing it just below<br />
the Jamestown Canal, although it is only visible from the river from time to time. This was the Old<br />
Midland Great Western Railway, with its line to Sligo, passing through Carrick-on-Shannon in 1862.<br />
Lough Corry consists of three small lakes connected by wide stretches of river. South of this lake, the<br />
river turns east and begins its great loop; part of this loop is not navigable and is by-passed by the<br />
Jamestown Canal. <strong>The</strong> Shannon Commissioners found that they had to replace the bridge at Jamestown<br />
and it subsequently suffered damage in the 1920s when one of the arches was blown up; approaching from<br />
upstream the arch that was substituted is still clearly visible being of a lighter colour than the rest of the<br />
bridge. <strong>The</strong> weir located here was <strong>built</strong> by the Commissioners who first had to remove old mill works<br />
previously situated there before building their open weir wall. However these works failed to curtail<br />
flooding problems and studies were carried out in the 1860s. It was recommended that the alleviation of<br />
flooding would be achieved by the re-siting of this weir at a location upstream of the bridge where the<br />
approach channel would be less constricted but this was not implemented because of the cost and,<br />
instead, sluice gates were eventually fitted in the 1880s so that the flow could be regulated (Delaney<br />
1987).<br />
43