10.01.2014 Views

archaeological & built heritage assessment - The Heritage Council

archaeological & built heritage assessment - The Heritage Council

archaeological & built heritage assessment - The Heritage Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dwelling / earthworks (7) / deer park / souterrain / possible road / crannógs (9) / fulacht fiadh / field<br />

banks (3) / castle / tower / burial ground / nunnery tradition / historic town (Boyle) / possible barrow /<br />

deserted settlement / and a bridge. It is notable that in this area a distinct religious tradition was set up in<br />

the late medieval period in the form of ecclesiastical remains and abbeys etc., mostly on Lough Key itself.<br />

<strong>The</strong> area was also densely populated at this time, especially within the portion of Rockingham since the<br />

majority of enclosures are located there as well as crannógs on the shores of the lough.<br />

Area 4<br />

Area 4 has been defined as that from Carrick-on-Shannon to Roosky, including Jamestown, Drumsna, Mohill and<br />

Dromod (Jamestown bridge, Jamestown canal, Drumsna bridge, Albert lock, railway bridge, Dromod harbour,<br />

Roosky lock, Roosky bridge)<br />

<strong>The</strong> bridge at Carrick-on-Shannon had been erected in 1718 to replace an earlier one; the local landlord,<br />

Sir George St George, had enjoyed the toll rights on the first bridge in return for keeping it in repair and<br />

he was probably also involved in the construction of the eighteenth century bridge (Delaney 1987). John<br />

Brownrigg, who later became the engineer to the Directors General of Inland Navigation, surveyed the<br />

river in the 1790s and remarked: ‘A Boat of Burden cannot in summer pass the Bridge of Carrick’ (ibid.). He<br />

said that the fifth arch from the west side was the best for navigation but it was only 28ft 6in wide with<br />

about half the headroom of the present bridge. <strong>The</strong>se comments suggest that some boats were using the<br />

river north of Carrick-on-Shannon even though navigation works had not been extended above the town.<br />

Upstream of the bridge a harbour had been excavated in 1829 on land donated by the St Georges and this<br />

was approached by a narrow channel.<br />

In the 1830s, when Rhodes was surveying the river for the Shannon Commission, Carrick-on-Shannon<br />

was a town of some 2000 inhabitants. <strong>The</strong> commissioners decided to replace the old bridge and it was<br />

blown up in 1845. <strong>The</strong> original plans envisaged an opening arch in the new bridge however no opening<br />

spans were made upstream of the Jamestown Canal because of financial constraints (ibid.). Despite this,<br />

quay walls were <strong>built</strong> and the old harbour above the bridge was enlarged.<br />

<strong>The</strong> railway line follows the river closely from Carrick-on-Shannon to Lough Bofin crossing it just below<br />

the Jamestown Canal, although it is only visible from the river from time to time. This was the Old<br />

Midland Great Western Railway, with its line to Sligo, passing through Carrick-on-Shannon in 1862.<br />

Lough Corry consists of three small lakes connected by wide stretches of river. South of this lake, the<br />

river turns east and begins its great loop; part of this loop is not navigable and is by-passed by the<br />

Jamestown Canal. <strong>The</strong> Shannon Commissioners found that they had to replace the bridge at Jamestown<br />

and it subsequently suffered damage in the 1920s when one of the arches was blown up; approaching from<br />

upstream the arch that was substituted is still clearly visible being of a lighter colour than the rest of the<br />

bridge. <strong>The</strong> weir located here was <strong>built</strong> by the Commissioners who first had to remove old mill works<br />

previously situated there before building their open weir wall. However these works failed to curtail<br />

flooding problems and studies were carried out in the 1860s. It was recommended that the alleviation of<br />

flooding would be achieved by the re-siting of this weir at a location upstream of the bridge where the<br />

approach channel would be less constricted but this was not implemented because of the cost and,<br />

instead, sluice gates were eventually fitted in the 1880s so that the flow could be regulated (Delaney<br />

1987).<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!