10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Waterford<br />

Ireland and took up at Port Lairge’ and ‘a very large fleet <strong>of</strong> Lochlainn settled at Port Lairge<br />

and plundered the north <strong>of</strong> Osraige (Barry 1997, 13).<br />

<strong>The</strong> name ‘Waterford’ appears to have retained its Old Norse-derived place-name and has<br />

been translated as ‘windy fjord’ or fjord <strong>of</strong> the ram’. <strong>The</strong> first recorded use <strong>of</strong> the Latin form<br />

<strong>of</strong> this name was in A.D. 1096 when the citizens <strong>of</strong> the ‘civitatem Wataferdiam nomine’ (the<br />

city named Waterford) sought the consecration <strong>of</strong> a bishop and Malachus was elected by the<br />

clerics and people <strong>of</strong> the city. A twelfth century account <strong>of</strong> a mid-ninth century Norse chief<br />

also contains a battle-catalogue which describes a battle at ‘i Vedhrafirdh’ or Waterford (Barry<br />

1997, 13).<br />

<strong>The</strong> Scandinavian town <strong>of</strong> Waterford was located within a naturally protective triangular<br />

space flanked by the River Suir to the north and St. John’s River and marshland to the east<br />

and south (Fig. 301). <strong>The</strong> settlement extended from Reginald’s Tower along the south bank<br />

<strong>of</strong> the River Suir to the site <strong>of</strong> Turgesius castle and from there southwards to St. Martin’s<br />

castle before returning parallel to the marshy ground adjacent to St. John’s River (Hurley<br />

1992, 49; Hurley 1997b, 7).<br />

<strong>The</strong> triangular enclosure was located on the crest <strong>of</strong> a ridge- 9.3m OD maximum heightwhich<br />

was over 6m higher than the banks <strong>of</strong> the River Suir and the marsh <strong>of</strong> St. John’s River<br />

on its northern, eastern and southern sides. <strong>The</strong> ground slopes downwards to the north,<br />

south and east <strong>of</strong> Christchurch cathedral. <strong>The</strong> crest <strong>of</strong> the ridge broadens out towards the<br />

west with the break in slope occurring to the north <strong>of</strong> High Street and south <strong>of</strong> Lady’s Lane.<br />

<strong>The</strong> initial longphort <strong>of</strong> A.D. 914 was probably located at the eastern end <strong>of</strong> the promontory<br />

in an area subsequently known as Dundory, the eastern tip <strong>of</strong> which was inhabited by<br />

Reginald’s tower. <strong>The</strong> placename Dundory might preserve the memory <strong>of</strong> an earlier fort and<br />

it was still used as an alternative name for Reginald’s Tower in A.D. 1463 and was apparently<br />

used to describe the whole area <strong>of</strong> the walls between Reginald’s Tower and the<br />

Cathedral/Bishop Palace complex as late as A.D. 1680 (Bradley & Halpin, 1992).<br />

Hurley (1997b, 8-11) has proposed a model for the topographical development <strong>of</strong><br />

Scandinavian Waterford based both on cartographic and archaeological evidence. He has<br />

suggested that the Phase 1, tenth-century Dún (identified as Dundory) may have extended<br />

from Reginald’s Tower along the quays for 150m before turning to the south through the<br />

Cathedral to the marsh. <strong>The</strong> Dún may have contained a single main bisecting street from the<br />

river front to Cathedral Square with the main west gateway on the crest <strong>of</strong> the ridge to the<br />

north <strong>of</strong> the cathedral.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Phase 2 development may have involved the enclosure by ramparts <strong>of</strong> a further strip<br />

35m wide top the west <strong>of</strong> the primary nucleus towards the end <strong>of</strong> the tenth century. This<br />

stage is indicated by an east-west orientation <strong>of</strong> properties (after Richard and Scalé map <strong>of</strong><br />

1764) at variance with the north-south alignment <strong>of</strong> properties within the triangular space.<br />

This unusual layout is mirrored at the west end <strong>of</strong> the triangle between the eleventh/twelfthcentury<br />

ramparts and twelfth century wall (Hurley 1997b, 9).<br />

Very little archaeological evidence for the tenth and early eleventh century Scandinavian<br />

settlement has come to light but this can probably be explained since the bulk <strong>of</strong> the<br />

extensive series <strong>of</strong> excavations in the 1980s and 1990s took place along Peter Street, High<br />

Street and Lady Lane to the west <strong>of</strong> the postulated tenth-century settlement.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Phase 3 development dated to the eleventh/mid-twelfth century represented the single<br />

largest expansion <strong>of</strong> the settlement with the formal layout <strong>of</strong> three east-west streets from the<br />

Stage 2 enclosure. Peter Street was situated on the central spine <strong>of</strong> the ridge with Lady Lane<br />

and High Street to its south and north respectively. <strong>The</strong> Stage 2 settlement was enclosed on<br />

the western side by earthen ramparts in the late eleventh century which were further<br />

674

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!