10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Waterford<br />

‘Kiltera’ (Dromore td.), Co. Waterford<br />

Ecclesiastical Settlement<br />

Grid Ref: X10589134 (210580/091343)<br />

SMR No: WA029-042001<br />

Excavation Licence: N/A<br />

Excavation Duration: September 1934<br />

Site Director: R.A.S. Macalister (University College Dublin)<br />

An enclosure known locally as ‘Kiltera’ revealed a series <strong>of</strong> early trenches, three ogham<br />

stones, a bell-shaped pit associated with an area <strong>of</strong> ironworking, an undated wall feature and<br />

a cemetery <strong>of</strong> relatively recent date. Approximately three quarters <strong>of</strong> the interior <strong>of</strong> the<br />

enclosure was excavated as part <strong>of</strong> a state grant for the relief <strong>of</strong> unemployment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> enclosure was located in a field bounded on its eastern side by the deflected course <strong>of</strong><br />

the River Goish and on the north and west by a side-road. It was situated in Dromore<br />

townland and marked as ‘site <strong>of</strong> Kiltera graveyard’ in the First Edition O.S. map. Two ogham<br />

stones were recorded at the site in the nineteenth century and sparked an interest in the<br />

excavation.<br />

Prior to excavation, the enclosure contained an almost effaced circular rampart,<br />

approximately 37m in diameter. A mound <strong>of</strong> stones was uncovered close to the western edge<br />

<strong>of</strong> the enclosure and two ogham stones were recorded on it in the nineteenth century. Some<br />

possible ruined structures intermingled with the roots <strong>of</strong> a sycamore tree were identified near<br />

the rampart at the eastern side but were not investigated. Excavations uncovered a range <strong>of</strong><br />

features.<br />

<strong>The</strong> undisturbed subsoil <strong>of</strong> the site consisted <strong>of</strong> a compact reddish gravel layer which it was<br />

suggested was confined to the area <strong>of</strong> the enclosure. <strong>The</strong> gravelly subsoil was covered by a<br />

blackish loamy organic-rich deposit with occasional pockets <strong>of</strong> charcoal. Water worn pebbles<br />

and fragments <strong>of</strong> white quartz were identified just below the grass-sods. A few fragments <strong>of</strong><br />

reddish quartz and jasper also occurred and associated with them were a few scraps <strong>of</strong><br />

modern china.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first phase <strong>of</strong> activity comprised two roughly east-west trenches traversing the enclosure.<br />

<strong>The</strong> inner trench- 0.8m deep- was excavated to the south <strong>of</strong> the centre <strong>of</strong> the enclosure. It<br />

cut into the underlying subsoil and was uncovered beneath a footing <strong>of</strong> water-worn pebbles,<br />

interpreted as a possible smelting-furnace (See Phase 2). <strong>The</strong> outer trench was uncovered<br />

6m to the south <strong>of</strong> the inner trench near the southern enclosure perimeter. <strong>The</strong> terminals <strong>of</strong><br />

both these trenches were lost in the parts <strong>of</strong> the enclosure left un-dug. <strong>The</strong>se trenches were<br />

interpreted as forming part <strong>of</strong> some system <strong>of</strong> artificial water-courses dug in connection with<br />

the nearby river whose original course appears to have run quite close to the site.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second phase <strong>of</strong> activity comprised a subterranean circular pit associated with an area <strong>of</strong><br />

ironworking. <strong>The</strong> pit (Fig. 299) was bell-shaped (1.8m deep by 2.3m in diameter) and was<br />

uncovered just west <strong>of</strong> the centre <strong>of</strong> the enclosure. Several pockets <strong>of</strong> ashes, iron slag and a<br />

possible anvil and pestle were uncovered within the fill <strong>of</strong> the pit while slag was also<br />

recovered around the area <strong>of</strong> the pit. <strong>The</strong> pit was not stone-lined and was interpreted by the<br />

excavator as a ‘pit-dwelling <strong>of</strong> some kind’ associated with ironworking activities. Alternatively,<br />

the bell-shaped pit may have been used for the storage <strong>of</strong> grain (Proudfoot 1961, 109).<br />

Associated with the bell-shaped pit was a black clay deposit, 6m to its south from which were<br />

recovered numerous fragments <strong>of</strong> iron slag. <strong>The</strong> black clay deposit rested on a footing <strong>of</strong><br />

water-worn stones- interpreted as a possible hearth for an iron smelting-furnace. Several<br />

fragments <strong>of</strong> iron slag were embedded into the water-worn pebbles. A short distance to the<br />

south was recovered a bed <strong>of</strong> ashes also associated with iron slag. It was suggested that the<br />

possible anvil and pestle may have been used to pulverize the iron ore, and local memory<br />

recorded that a band <strong>of</strong> iron ore had been exploited in the district till recent times.<br />

668

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!