10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tipperary<br />

stones, apparently the bottom course <strong>of</strong> a rough wall, survived on its west side and one<br />

shallow posthole was found against its east side near the northern end. This feature is later<br />

than House 1 and may represent the remains <strong>of</strong> a robbed out souterrain.<br />

A pit-like feature, identified as a possible corn-drying kiln, cut into the inner slope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

southern enclosure ditch (Cutting 1) and contained a black layer <strong>of</strong> carbonized grain similar to<br />

that recovered inside the fill <strong>of</strong> the enclosing ditch. A double row <strong>of</strong> stones running west<br />

along the ditch may represent the demolished remains <strong>of</strong> the kiln’s flue. A calibrated 2Σ<br />

radiocarbon date from the grain dated the kiln to A.D. 937-1172 (see below).<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> other early pits and a hearth were uncovered within the various cuttings (2, 4<br />

and 6) within the enclosure interior. One shallow irregular depression in cutting 4 contained a<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> charcoal and iron slag and indicates ironworking on site. An undated standing<br />

stone situated in the centre <strong>of</strong> the site (Cutting 2) was held in place by packing stones inside<br />

a large shallow oblong pit (0.75m maximum depth).<br />

Two parallel low banks (20m apart) with external ditches ran westwards from the oval<br />

enclosure and may have formed part <strong>of</strong> some type <strong>of</strong> enclosure annex. <strong>The</strong> ditches were<br />

comparable both in size and fill to the main enclosure ditch and maybe roughly<br />

contemporary. Finds from the ditch included a small E ware pottery vessel recovered in a redeposited<br />

context in an upper fill and a small fragment <strong>of</strong> iron.<br />

<strong>The</strong> southern bank <strong>of</strong> the annex cut across a long straight re-cut narrow trench (0.8-1m wide<br />

and 0.6m deep) which continued in both directions for 20m beyond the excavation area. A<br />

small piece <strong>of</strong> iron slag was the only find recovered from this feature. Four cultivation furrows<br />

inside the annex appear to be later than the annex banks.<br />

<strong>The</strong> post-medieval cemetery consisted <strong>of</strong> roughly 80 excavated burials; all from within the<br />

eastern two thirds <strong>of</strong> the enclosure interior and none related to the standing stone. Burials<br />

rarely disturbed each other suggesting that they were marked by upright stones or slabs. <strong>The</strong><br />

burials cut across earlier pits, postholes and other features and shroud pins and a clay pipe<br />

from a number <strong>of</strong> graves confirm a post-medieval date.<br />

Evidence for spinning and weaving on the site was suggested by the perforated stone disc<br />

(thread separator) inside House 1 as well as two spindle-whorls from the site. Iron smelting is<br />

also indicated by the recovery <strong>of</strong> slag though no furnace was uncovered. <strong>The</strong> small<br />

fragmentary faunal assemblage comprised cattle, pig, sheep or goat, wild game and a red<br />

deer antler fragment. Wheat and oats were grown and were ground with querns recovered<br />

from the site.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two main chronological divisions consisted <strong>of</strong> an early medieval occupational phase and a<br />

mainly post-medieval burial phase. <strong>The</strong> piece <strong>of</strong> E ware indicates that the site was occupied<br />

from at least the sixth/mid seventh century A.D. Continued early medieval occupation is<br />

indicated by the circular houses, the later possible souterrain and the tenth-twelfth century<br />

kiln.<br />

<strong>The</strong> enclosure is about twice the size as the typical ‘ringfort’ and is more comparable to the<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> ecclesiastical enclosures. <strong>The</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> any church, definite early burials or crossslabs<br />

might suggest that it was not ecclesiastical though the limited nature <strong>of</strong> excavation<br />

cannot preclude their existence. <strong>The</strong> parish <strong>of</strong> ‘Kildadrum’ (1302-06) and Kyllydiradruim<br />

(1450) was recorded in two medieval sources though its absence from the Civil Survey (1659)<br />

might imply that ‘this was a parish in name only with no actual church structure’.<br />

<strong>The</strong> re-use <strong>of</strong> long abandoned sites for worship and burial by the Catholic community after<br />

the Reformation is not uncommon and could explain the post-medieval cemetery. Though<br />

marked as a graveyard called ‘Killederdadrum’ in the first edition (1841) O.S. map, the<br />

640

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!