10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Meath<br />

fragment and frequent flint items. <strong>The</strong> second re-cut displayed potential evidence for a<br />

causewayed entrance to the east as this had not been located in earlier excavation. Animal<br />

bone and finds were few. <strong>The</strong> final re-cut again contained only a few artefacts and animal<br />

bone in some contexts. Charred seeds were also present.<br />

A multi-phase rectangular enclosure (Enclosure 4), measuring 40m by 24m, was annexed<br />

onto Enclosure 2 and continued in use throughout the D-shaped enclosure’s (Enclosure 3)<br />

lifetime. Charred seeds and animal bone was present in the ditch fills. <strong>The</strong>se were also<br />

discovered in the succeeding ditch re-cut as well as a copper alloy pin shaft and a needle. A<br />

final re-cut revealed animal bone, charcoal, charred seeds, worked bone and a copper alloy<br />

ringed pin.<br />

A small sub-circular enclosure (Enclosure 5) – 18m in diameter – was located to the east <strong>of</strong><br />

the above enclosures and enclosed a hearth and a kiln. <strong>The</strong> ditch fill included small quantities<br />

<strong>of</strong> charred cereal and animal bone.<br />

A large multi-phase rectangular enclosure was located to the north <strong>of</strong> Enclosures 1-5 within<br />

the River Boyne floodplain (Enclosure 6). A 2m causewayed entrance was located on its<br />

western side. <strong>The</strong> ditch was dug in the seventh century and very few finds were associated<br />

with this phase. Small quantities <strong>of</strong> animal bone, charred seeds, snail shell and charcoal were<br />

located within the first ditch re-cut. Artefacts included flint, an iron knife, fragments <strong>of</strong> iron<br />

objects and a copper alloy loop-headed pin shaft. Again, artefacts were scarce related to the<br />

final re-cut. A drain connected this with Enclosure 4. This large enclosure may have<br />

functioned as a floodplain-enriched meadow for cattle during the summer.<br />

A shallow, badly preserved enclosure ditch was recorded for a short distance along the<br />

eastern limit <strong>of</strong> excavation (Enclosure 7). However, the geophysical survey demonstrated that<br />

it formed an enclosure broadly similar in size and form to Enclosure 4 which suggests they<br />

were contemporary. Its single fill contained small quantities <strong>of</strong> animal bone.<br />

An irregular-shaped enclosure (Enclosure 8; 20m by 22m) was located to the south <strong>of</strong><br />

Enclosure 3. Animal bone, charcoal and charred grain were recovered in varying quantities<br />

and an iron knife was the only artefact retrieved. A small enclosure was appended to its<br />

western edge (Enclosure 9).<br />

Two poorly preserved structures were identified at Dowdstown 2. <strong>The</strong> first, (Structure A), was<br />

possibly square, or rectangular, and survived to a maximum length <strong>of</strong> 10m. This post-built<br />

structure was surrounded by a partially extant drip gully and may have been 6m wide. It was<br />

cut by Enclosure 2 and, therefore, predated it. Charred barley grain from one <strong>of</strong> its postholes<br />

was dated to A.D. 553-658 indicating that it was contemporary with Enclosure 1. <strong>The</strong><br />

structure may have served as a barn or grain store because charred grain was recovered<br />

from a number <strong>of</strong> associated deposits.<br />

A collection <strong>of</strong> 11 postholes were clustered together internally within Enclosure 1 but they did<br />

not form a recognisable structural plan. One posthole was dated to A.D. 689-899 and it is<br />

possible that more than one building is represented by these features. <strong>The</strong> radiocarbon date<br />

suggests that a structure was contemporary with Enclosure 3.<br />

537

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!