10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Galway<br />

Mackney, Co. Galway<br />

Early Medieval Settlement Enclosure.<br />

Grid Ref: M83742941 (183745/229417)<br />

SMR No: N/A.<br />

Excavation Licence: A024/E2444<br />

Excavation Duration/Year: December 2005 – February 2006.<br />

Site Director: F. Delaney (Eachtra)<br />

<strong>The</strong> site consisted <strong>of</strong> a partially destroyed enclosure (55.64m in diameter) set on the side <strong>of</strong> a<br />

low hill (Fig. 158). <strong>The</strong> enclosure was not included in the SMR and was only recognised<br />

during field-walking undertaken as part <strong>of</strong> the Environmental Impact Assessment. <strong>The</strong> site<br />

was excavated to facilitate road construction.<br />

Excavation revealed three main phases <strong>of</strong> occupation on site. <strong>The</strong> earliest phase <strong>of</strong><br />

occupation was indicated by the presence <strong>of</strong> two fire pits, and a number <strong>of</strong> linear features, all<br />

<strong>of</strong> which underlay the later enclosure bank. A radiocarbon date from charcoal associated with<br />

one <strong>of</strong> these fire-pits suggests that the bank was constructed quite late in the early medieval<br />

period (see below). This date (A.D. 771-899) is almost identical to one <strong>of</strong> the dates returned<br />

from the ironworking area (A.D. 775-900), however, which suggests that at least some<br />

ironworking may have been conducted on site prior to the construction <strong>of</strong> the bank.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second phase <strong>of</strong> occupation was marked by the construction <strong>of</strong> the enclosure ditch,<br />

which had maximum dimensions <strong>of</strong> 6m wide and 3.1m deep. <strong>The</strong> lower ditch fills were<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> silts, presumably from gradual slippage, but a series <strong>of</strong> higher ditch fills,<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> medium to large sub-rounded stones, would appear to represent the collapsed<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> the stone revetment from the outer face <strong>of</strong> the bank. A similar stone revetment<br />

appears to have existed on the interior face <strong>of</strong> the bank. A series <strong>of</strong> large postholes, found at<br />

the entrance, have been interpreted as either representing a gateway into the enclosure, or<br />

possibly as the remains <strong>of</strong> a more substantial gatehouse structure. A series <strong>of</strong> structures were<br />

identified in the interior. <strong>The</strong> foundation trench for the roundhouse, Structure A (5.4m in<br />

diameter), appears to have been divided into eight straight sections, which may represent the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> wooden foundation planks. A porch and possible ro<strong>of</strong>-supports were also<br />

indicated by the pattern <strong>of</strong> postholes. <strong>The</strong> partial remains <strong>of</strong> another roundhouse, (Structure<br />

C (4.48m in diameter), were also indicated by a curvilinear foundation trench. As with<br />

Structure A, this had some evidence for internal sub-division. A possible curvilinear lean-to<br />

structure, (Structure B), was also identified. This structure measured 3.8m by 8.4m and<br />

appeared to use the bank as a rear wall; a hearth was located within this building. Another<br />

curvilinear structure, (Structure E), which was composed <strong>of</strong> six postholes with a central post,<br />

was identified in the north-west <strong>of</strong> the interior. It appeared to have been open to the north<br />

and may have constituted a shelter or wind-break. Patterns <strong>of</strong> postholes also identified two<br />

rectilinear structures in the interior – a rectangular building (Structure D); and an L-shaped<br />

structure (Structure F). Other groups <strong>of</strong> postholes were uncovered, but these could not be<br />

identified with possible structures. A dry-stone built souterrain was constructed during this<br />

phase, and may have been associated with House F.<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> bowl furnaces/smithing hearths were also identified to the north <strong>of</strong> the entrance.<br />

Dates from these features range from the ninth/tenth century, to the eleventh/twelfth<br />

century (see below). Two series <strong>of</strong> postholes found in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> this metalworking area<br />

are presumably related to workshops, but the pattern <strong>of</strong> these could not be clearly identified.<br />

Four large fire pits were later dug into the interior <strong>of</strong> the site. Three radiocarbon dates from<br />

these place them in the fourteenth to seventeenth centuries. <strong>The</strong> site was then used as<br />

quarry, before being utilised as a cillín – 143 infant skeletons were recovered during<br />

excavation.<br />

Just over 5000 animal bones were recovered from the early medieval phase <strong>of</strong> the site,<br />

mainly <strong>of</strong> domesticates (cattle dominant, then sheep and pigs). Few finds were directly<br />

316

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!