10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Down<br />

Two medieval wells were excavated to the west <strong>of</strong> the stone building. <strong>The</strong> first was unlined and<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> a circular shaft cut into the natural. It silted up over a long period <strong>of</strong> time before being<br />

deliberately recently infilled. Finds from the lower fill indicate a later thirteenth or fourteenth century<br />

date for the well’s primary silting. <strong>The</strong> second was stone-lined and constructed in a circular shaft,<br />

1.4m in diameter at the top, 1.05m in diameter at the bottom, and cut to a depth <strong>of</strong> 1.55m. A square<br />

well faced with stone blocks was constructed within the circular shaft and a posthole on the west side<br />

<strong>of</strong> the well may have supported a post <strong>of</strong> a wooden superstructure. <strong>The</strong> well was not earlier than the<br />

thirteenth century with silting occurring in the later fourteenth and fifteenth centuries before its final<br />

blocking early in the post-medieval period. Finds from the fill <strong>of</strong> the well included a granite quern<br />

stone, the fragmentary remains <strong>of</strong> a medieval basket, souterrain ware and sherds <strong>of</strong> medieval wares.<br />

<strong>The</strong> finds from the occupation phase <strong>of</strong> the building and its associated midden included quantities <strong>of</strong><br />

souterrain ware and a wide range <strong>of</strong> native and imported medieval fine wares, indicating that its<br />

inhabitants was people <strong>of</strong> important status. Two secondary walls were also excavated and appear to<br />

be the foundations <strong>of</strong> a lean-to structure added to the main building. A paved area between the two<br />

walls may have been related to this later phase <strong>of</strong> occupation. A certain amount <strong>of</strong> slag was found in<br />

the medieval levels, but these may well have been redeposited early medieval debris; and the animal<br />

remains were the same as they were in the early medieval period, indicating no major change in diet.<br />

<strong>The</strong> large building may have fallen out <strong>of</strong> use by the early fourteenth century when its masonry was<br />

robbed. However, occupation continued elsewhere on the site with the dumping <strong>of</strong> an organic layer <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic refuse over the ruins <strong>of</strong> the large, now abandoned, building. This organic deposit was<br />

identical to, and represented an extension <strong>of</strong> the midden heap, which had long existed on the north<br />

side <strong>of</strong> the building. Considerable quantities <strong>of</strong> bone, souterrain ware pottery, later thirteenth and<br />

fourteenth century medieval wares and artefacts were recovered from this layer. A steep-sided, flatbottomed<br />

ditch was later excavated in the fourteenth century, blocking a small doorway into the<br />

abandoned stone building, but was backfilled shortly afterwards.<br />

<strong>The</strong> excavated area appears to have been open, even waste land, during the fourteenth century. <strong>The</strong><br />

two wells were still in use but were silting up and the micro-fauna found within the waterlogged<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the wells confirm this ‘sort <strong>of</strong> open, little used environment, though probably with<br />

some adjacent human activity’ (Ivens 1984, 74). Finds <strong>of</strong> painted glass and lead closing strips from<br />

this destruction horizon indicate that the nearby abbey was also in a state <strong>of</strong> decay in the fourteenth<br />

century. <strong>The</strong>re was little evidence for occupation after the fourteenth century and it appears that the<br />

excavated area was taken into agricultural use in this period. A rough patch <strong>of</strong> cobbling overlay the<br />

midden heap to the north <strong>of</strong> the large building and may relate to some building activity connected<br />

with the church in the fifteenth century. Also, uncovered was a steep-sided, flat-bottomed postmedieval<br />

field drain running across the eastern side <strong>of</strong> the excavated area. Other than these there<br />

were few finds <strong>of</strong> a similar date and it is possible that the construction <strong>of</strong> the modern buildings had<br />

destroyed most <strong>of</strong> the evidence for late- and post-medieval occupation in the area.<br />

For most <strong>of</strong> its history, this small area <strong>of</strong> Movilla Abbey appears to have been peripheral to the main<br />

area <strong>of</strong> human activity. Late Mesolithic, Neolithic and Bronze Age flint scatters indicate some<br />

intermittent occupation <strong>of</strong> the area in the prehistoric period. During the early medieval period, the<br />

area appears to have been at the edge <strong>of</strong> the ecclesiastical enclosure and was used primarily for<br />

industrial purposes. This part <strong>of</strong> the abbey also appears to have been more or less abandoned by the<br />

fourteenth century and afterwards used for agriculture. Only in the thirteenth century during the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> the large stone building does this area appear to have been used primarily for residential purposes.<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!