10.01.2014 Views

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

AR01055_EMAP_Gazetteer_of_Sites_4-2_10.pdf - The Heritage ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Down<br />

‘Dunnyneil Island’ (Dunnyneil Islands td.), Co. Down<br />

Early Medieval Settlement Enclosure.<br />

Grid Ref: J54745384 (35474/35384)<br />

SMR No: DOW 024:035<br />

Excavation Licence: AE/02/90; AE/03/71<br />

Excavation Duration/Year: September – October 2002; August – September 2003<br />

Director: F. McCormick (Queen’s University, Belfast) & P. Macdonald (Centre for<br />

Archaeological Fieldwork, Queen’s University, Belfast).<br />

<strong>The</strong> site is an enclosure, approximately 30m in diameter, comprising two banks and an intermediate<br />

ditch, which is set on the top <strong>of</strong> the larger <strong>of</strong> the Dunnyneil Islands in Strangford Lough (although it<br />

would appear that the two Dunnyneill Islands originally were part <strong>of</strong> a single, larger island). A smaller<br />

‘annex’ was added to this enclosure, and it is possible that further annexes may have been destroyed<br />

by tidal action. <strong>The</strong> site had been subject to coastal erosion and it was feared that the enclosure<br />

could be destroyed within 60 years (Fig. 98).<br />

In the first season, excavations in the north <strong>of</strong> the enclosure revealed a number <strong>of</strong> structural features<br />

including the rubble collapse <strong>of</strong> the inner revetment <strong>of</strong> the bank; a curvilinear gully; a hearth; and<br />

two linear features (possibly representing a palisade). <strong>The</strong> limited scope <strong>of</strong> the excavation, however,<br />

made it difficult to work out a relative chronology for these features.<br />

A second trench was laid through the banks and ditch, but again was not able to confidently establish<br />

their relative chronology, although they would appear to be contemporaneous. Excavation revealed,<br />

however, that the inner bank may have been deliberately slighted.<br />

<strong>The</strong> artefactual remains from the site (especially the three sherds <strong>of</strong> E ware and the fragment <strong>of</strong><br />

Germanic glass claw-beaker) suggest that activity was ongoing on the island in the sixth/mid-seventh<br />

century. This date is supported by a probable penannular brooch fragment (dated to the earlyseventh<br />

century). A fragment <strong>of</strong> a crucible; four fragments <strong>of</strong> slag; and two fragments <strong>of</strong> copper alloy<br />

were also found, suggesting that metalworking occurred on site.<br />

A more extensive excavation was undertaken in 2003 (Fig. 99). A further six trenches were opened<br />

revealing that the site had a long period <strong>of</strong> use. Possible earlier enclosure features were found under<br />

the inner bank, as well as un-associated prehistoric material. <strong>The</strong> early medieval enclosures appear to<br />

have been abandoned in the seventh or eighth century, possibly as a result <strong>of</strong> the collapse <strong>of</strong><br />

Merovingian trade networks, and the site was then not re-occupied until the eleventh or twelfth<br />

century. <strong>The</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> imported materials (three sherds <strong>of</strong> E ware and a number <strong>of</strong> glass<br />

fragments), and the relative lack <strong>of</strong> domestic material, suggests that the enclosure may have<br />

functioned as an emporium, rather than a high-status occupation site.<br />

199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!